The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Solid Garnet Batteries
Open accessAbstract
Summary The ever-increasing energy density of the Li-ion battery calls for utilization of high-capacity cathodes and anodes, which tend to be more reactive and thus bring serious safety concern. Under such context, the solid-state Li battery becomes a hotspot because of its potential in the breakthrough of energy density as well as the avoidance of uncontrollable chemical reactions. Recently, many review and perspective papers appear, addressing the urgency of improving solid-electrolytes’ ionic conductivity and constructing stable conductive interfaces between electrolyte and electrode with respect to available electrolytes, including polymers, nitrides, sulfides, and oxides. Nevertheless, each type of electrolyte has its own distinctive problems, which is worthwhile specifically elaborating in order to find effective solutions. Therefore, here, we present our viewpoints on the key issues related to the garnet electrolytes and relevant batteries, which have not ever been dedicatedly addressed previously. On the basis of our recent progress, together with others reported in the literature, we expect that the solid garnet batteries are promising for application if the best use is made of garnet advantages and disadvantages are bypassed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries
Lin, D., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.16 · Cited by 6,763
Interface Stability in Solid-State Batteries
Richards, W. D., Miara, L. J., Wang, Y., Kim, J. C., & Ceder, G. (2016) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04082 · Cited by 1,652
Nie, K., Hong, Y., Qiu, J., Li, Q., Yu, X., Li, H., & Chen, L. (2018) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2018.00616 · Cited by 278
Cited by
Tian, Y., Zeng, G., Rutt, A., Shi, T., Kim, H., Wang, J., Koettgen, J., Sun, Y., Ouyang, B., Chen, T., et al. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00767 · Cited by 1,614
Polymer Electrolytes for Lithium-Based Batteries: Advances and Prospects
Zhou, D., Shanmukaraj, D., Tkacheva, A., Armand, M., & Wang, G. (2019) · Chem · doi:10.1016/j.chempr.2019.05.009 · Cited by 1,539
Interfaces and Interphases in All-Solid-State Batteries with Inorganic Solid Electrolytes
Banerjee, A., Wang, X., Fang, C., Wu, E. A., & Meng, Y. S. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00101 · Cited by 1,526
Yang, H., & Wu, N. (2022) · Energy Science & Engineering · doi:10.1002/ese3.1163 · Cited by 586
Electrochemical energy storage devices working in extreme conditions
Chen, M., Zhang, Y., Xing, G., Chou, S.-L., & Tang, Y. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d1ee00271f · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, N., Khokhar, W., Bi, Z., Shi, C., Guo, X., Fan, L.-Z., & Nan, C.-W.
- Venue
- Joule
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1190-1199
- ISSN
- 2542-4351 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2938998554
- Cited by
- 492
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 23.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solid Garnet Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.joule.2019.03.019
- The paper
- Zhao, N., Khokhar, W., Bi, Z., Shi, C., Guo, X., Fan, L.-Z., & Nan, C.-W. (2019). Solid Garnet Batteries. Joule. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.03.019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.