Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 493

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enabling Flexible All-Perovskite Tandem Solar Cells

Open access
Palmstrom, Axel F., Eperon, Giles E., Leijtens, Tomas, Prasanna, Rohit, Habisreutinger, Severin N., Nemeth, William, Gaulding, E. Ashley, Dunfield, Sean P., Reese, Matthew, Nanayakkara, Sanjini, Moot, Taylor, Werner, Jérémie, Liu, Jun, To, Bobby, Christensen, Steven T., McGehee, Michael D., van Hest, Maikel F.A.M., Luther, Joseph M., Berry, Joseph J., Moore, David T.·2019·Joule

Abstract

Summary Multijunction all-perovskite solar cells offer a route toward efficiencies of III-V materials at low cost by combining the advantages of low thermalization loss in multijunction architectures with the beneficial properties of perovskites—namely, low processing cost, high-throughput fabrication, and compatibility with flexible substrates. However, there are two main challenges for enabling high-efficiency tandems: (1) design of a recombination layer to efficiently combine two perovskite subcells while also preventing bottom cell damage during top cell processing and (2) achieving high open-circuit voltage of the wide-gap subcell. Herein, we overcome both of these challenges. First, we demonstrate a nucleation layer consisting of an ultra-thin polymer with nucleophilic hydroxyl and amine functional groups for nucleating a conformal, low-conductivity aluminum zinc oxide layer by atomic layer deposition (ALD). This method enables ALD-grown recombination layers that reduce shunting as well as solvent degradation from solution processing on top of existing perovskite active layers. Next, we demonstrate a band-gap tuning strategy based on A-site cations of mismatched size (dimethylammonium and cesium) to enable a 1.7 eV perovskite with high, stable voltages. By combining these advances, we fabricate two-terminal all-perovskite tandem solar cells with 23.1% power conversion efficiency on rigid substrates and 21.3% on flexible plastic substrates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.joule.2019.05.009

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

See all 493

Metadata

Authors
Palmstrom, A. F., Eperon, G. E., Leijtens, T., Prasanna, R., Habisreutinger, S. N., Nemeth, W., Gaulding, E. A., Dunfield, S. P., Reese, M., Nanayakkara, S., Moot, T., Werner, J., Liu, J., To, B., Christensen, S. T., McGehee, M. D., van Hest, M. F. A. M., Luther, J. M., Berry, J. J., & Moore, D. T.
Venue
Joule
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
3
Issue
9
Pages
2193-2204
ISSN
2542-4351 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2945757074
Cited by
493
References
36
FWCI
22.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enabling Flexible All-Perovskite Tandem Solar Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.joule.2019.05.009
The paper
Palmstrom, A. F., Eperon, G. E., Leijtens, T., Prasanna, R., Habisreutinger, S. N., Nemeth, W., Gaulding, E. A., Dunfield, S. P., Reese, M., Nanayakkara, S., Moot, T., Werner, J., Liu, J., To, B., Christensen, S. T., McGehee, M. D., van Hest, M. F. A. M., Luther, J. M., Berry, J. J., & Moore, D. T. (2019). Enabling Flexible All-Perovskite Tandem Solar Cells. Joule. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.05.009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.