The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient Direct Recycling of Lithium-Ion Battery Cathodes by Targeted Healing
Open accessAbstract
Summary Recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is an urgent need to address their environmental and global sustainability issues. Here, we report an efficient and environmentally benign LIB regeneration method based on defect-targeted healing, which represents a paradigm-shift LIB recycling strategy. Specifically, by combining low-temperature aqueous solution relithiation and rapid post-annealing, we demonstrate successful direct regeneration of spent LiFePO4 (LFP) cathodes, one of the most important materials for EVs and grid storage applications. We show revitalization of composition, structure, and electrochemical performance of LFP with various degradation conditions to the same levels as the pristine LFP. Life-cycle analysis of different LIB recycling processes shows that this defect-targeted direct reycling approach can significantly reduce energy usage and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, leading to more economic and environmental benefits compared with today's hydrometallurgical and pyrometallurgical methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2014) · doi:10.59327/ipcc/ar5-9789291691432 · Cited by 5,217
Examining different recycling processes for lithium-ion batteries
Ciez, R. E., & Whitacre, J. F. (2019) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0222-5 · Cited by 965
Cited by
Neumann, J., Petranikova, M., Meeus, M., Gamarra, J. D., Younesi, R., Winter, M., & Nowak, S. (2022) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202102917 · Cited by 805
Ji, G., Wang, J., Liang, Z., Jia, K., Ma, J., Zhuang, Z., Zhou, G., & Cheng, H.-M. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36197-6 · Cited by 518
Mao, J., Ye, C., Zhang, S., Xie, F., Zeng, R., Davey, K., Guo, Z., & Qiao, S. (2022) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d2ee00162d · Cited by 365
Recycling of lithium iron phosphate batteries: Status, technologies, challenges, and prospects
Wang, M., Liu, K., Dutta, S., Alessi, D. S., Rinklebe, J., Ok, Y. S., & Tsang, D. C. W. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112515 · Cited by 361
A review on the recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) by the bioleaching approach
Roy, J. J., Cao, B., & Madhavi, S. (2021) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130944 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, P., Dai, Q., Gao, H., Liu, H., Zhang, M., Li, M., Chen, Y., An, K., Meng, Y. S., Liu, P., Li, Y., Spangenberger, J. S., Gaines, L., Lu, J., & Chen, Z.
- Venue
- Joule
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2609-2626
- ISSN
- 2542-4351 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3104615841
- Cited by
- 764
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient Direct Recycling of Lithium-Ion Battery Cathodes by Targeted Healing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.joule.2020.10.008
- The paper
- Xu, P., Dai, Q., Gao, H., Liu, H., Zhang, M., Li, M., Chen, Y., An, K., Meng, Y. S., Liu, P., Li, Y., Spangenberger, J. S., Gaines, L., Lu, J., & Chen, Z. (2020). Efficient Direct Recycling of Lithium-Ion Battery Cathodes by Targeted Healing. Joule. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2020.10.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
