Cited by 53Green IT and SustainabilityEnergy Efficiency in ComputingCloud Computing and Resource Management

Does not compute: Avoiding pitfalls assessing the Internet's energy and carbon impacts

Open access
Koomey, Jonathan, Masanet, Eric·2021·Joule

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.joule.2021.05.007

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Past projections of rising energy use due to technology in the dot-com boom of the early 2000s failed to materialize.

    “as Koomey and Masanet [65] cogently argue, this is not the first time the alarm has been raised about rising energy use due to technology, and that similar projections made in the dot-com boom of the early 2000s failed to materialize.”

    From From Efficiency Gains to Rebound Effects: The Problem of Jevons' Paradox in AI's Polarized Environmental Debate (2025) · cites this paper as [65]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says extrapolations of 1990s Internet-traffic growth led to excess network capacity around 2000, with significant energy implications. It also describes later projections of data-center energy use that overestimated growth. It does not say that projections of rising energy use made during the dot-com boom failed to materialize. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Poor data availability, flawed methodology, and inaccurate reporting caused inaccurate projections in data center energy use that did not take into account significant improvements in data center efficiency.

    “They cite poor data availability, flawed methodology, and inaccurate reporting as causes for inaccurate projections in data center energy use that ultimately did not take into account significant improvements in data center efficiency.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [1]1. Koomey, J. Separating Fact from Fiction: A Challenge For The Media IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine. 2014; 3:9-11 Crossref Scopus (2) Google Scholar
  2. [3]3. Dreazen, Y.J. (2002) Behind the Fiber Glut. The Wall Street Journal. September 26, 2002. B1. Google Scholar
  3. [5]5. Belkhir, L. ∙ Elmeligi, A. Assessing ICT global emissions footprint: Trends to 2040 & recommendations J. Clean. Prod. 2018; 177:448-463 Crossref Scopus (502) Google Scholar
  4. [9]9. Aslan, J. ∙ Mayers, K. ∙ Koomey, J.G. ... Electricity Intensity of Internet Data Transmission: Untangling the Estimates J. Ind. Ecol. 2018; 22:785-798 Crossref Scopus (105) Google Scholar
  5. [10]10. Koomey, J. Turning Numbers into Knowledge: Mastering the Art of Problem Solving Analytics Press, 2017 Google Scholar
  6. [11]11. Mora, C. ∙ Rollins, R.L. ∙ Taladay, K. ... Bitcoin emissions alone could push global warming above 2°C Nat. Clim. Chang. 2018; 8:931-933 Crossref Scopus (243) Google Scholar
  7. [12]12. Masanet, E. ∙ Shehabi, A. ∙ Lei, N. ... Implausible projections overestimate near-term Bitcoin CO2 emissions Nat. Clim. Chang. 2019; 9:653-654 Crossref Scopus (42) Google Scholar
  8. [13]13. Mora, C. ∙ Rollins, R.L. ∙ Taladay, K. ... Mora et al. reply Nature Climate Change. 2019; 9:658-659 Crossref Scopus (2) Google Scholar
  9. [15]15. Obringer, R. ∙ Rachunok, B. ∙ Maia-Silva, D. ... The overlooked environmental footprint of increasing Internet use Resour. Conserv. Recycling. 2021; 167:105389 Crossref Scopus (93) Google Scholar
  10. [16]16. Koomey, J.G. ∙ Berard, S. ∙ Sanchez, M. ... Implications of Historical Trends in The Electrical Efficiency of Computing IEEE Ann. Hist. Comput. 2011; 33:46-54 Crossref Scopus (328) Google Scholar

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koomey, J., & Masanet, E.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Koomey, Jonathan
Venue
Joule
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
5
Issue
7
Pages
1625-1628
ISSN
2542-4351 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3173702736
Cited by
53
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Joule (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  • Northwestern University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Energy Efficiency in Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
Keywords
data centers, CO2 emissions, sustainability indicators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review