Cited by 117Reproductive Health and ContraceptionBone health and osteoporosis researchHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

Bone mineral density in adolescent females using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate

Lara-Torre, Eduardo, Edwards, Catherine P, Perlman, Sally, Hertweck, S.Paige·2004·Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology

Abstract

Study objective To examine bone mineral density (BMD) on a semi-annual basis among control subjects and adolescent females receiving depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) injection or oral contraceptives.Design Non-randomized prospective study.Setting Teenage pregnancy prevention intervention clinic.Participants Adolescent females who were new users of DMPA injection (N=58, age 12-21) or the oral contraceptive pill (N=71, age 11-19) and normal menstruating girls (N=19, age 15-18).Interventions Baseline and 6-monthly measures of lumbar vertebral BMD using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry over a 2-year period.Main outcome measures comparison of percent change on BMD over time between DMPA users, pill users, and normal menstruating girls.Results There was no difference on group characteristics at baseline except for the ethnicity between the controls and the DMPA group. There was a statistically significant decrease in BMD between DMPA users and controls at 6 months (-3.02% change, P=0.014) 12 months (-3.38% change, P=0.001) 18 months (-4.81% change, P<0.001) and 24 months (-6.81% change, P=0.010). There was no statistical difference between pill users and controls.Conclusion There is a relationship between DMPA use and a decrease in BMD compared to normal menstruating controls that seems to persist up to 24 months.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpag.2003.11.017

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prolonged DMPA use is associated with decrease in BMD and increased risk of fracture due to estrogen deficiency.

    “One of major sources of concerns regarding prolonged use of DMPA is the decrease of BMD and the increase risk of fracture, due to estrogen deficiency accompanying its use.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lara-Torre, E., Edwards, C. P., Perlman, S., & Hertweck, S. P.
Affiliations
University of Louisville (US)
Venue
Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-02
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
17-21
ISSN
  • 0932-8610 (ISSN-L)
  • 1083-3188
OpenAlex
W1970320888
Cited by
117
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
12.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
bone mineral density, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, oral contraceptives, adolescent girls, bone loss, lumbar spine, contraceptive side effects, adolescent pregnancy prevention
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Contraceptive Agents, Female, Female, Humans, Injections, Prospective Studies, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Medroxyprogesterone Acetate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review