The DOI matches its Crossref record; 119 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward a Theoretical Model for Mindfulness-Based Pain Management
Open accessAbstract
Unlabelled Mindfulness, as both a process and a practice, has received substantial research attention across a range of health conditions, including chronic pain. Previously proposed mechanisms underlying the potential health-related benefits of mindfulness and mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are based on a strong theoretical background. However, to date, an empirically grounded, integrated theoretical model of the mechanisms of MBIs within the context of chronic pain has yet to be proposed. This is a surprising gap in the literature given the exponential growth of studies reporting on the benefits of MBIs for heterogeneous chronic pain conditions. Moreover, given the importance of determining how, and for whom, psychological interventions for pain management are effective, it is imperative that this gap in the literature be addressed. The overarching aim of the current theoretical paper was to propose an initial integrated, theoretically driven, and empirically based model of the mechanisms of MBIs for chronic pain management. Theoretical and research implications of the model are discussed. The theoretical considerations proposed herein can be used to help organize and guide future research that will identify the mechanisms underlying the benefits of mindfulness-based treatments, and perhaps psychosocial treatments more broadly, for chronic pain management.Perspective This focus article presents an initial framework for an empirically based, theoretical model of the mechanisms of MBIs for chronic pain management. Implications of the framework for refining theory and for future research are addressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“treatment effects for behavioral therapies tend to be modest”
From The chronic pain skills study: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing hypnosis, mindfulness meditation and pain education in Veterans (2020) · cites this paper as [41]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Chronic pain is a biopsychosocial condition, and mounting evidence supports the efficacy of interventions that target pain from this more holistic perspective.[41, 90]”
From The chronic pain skills study: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing hypnosis, mindfulness meditation and pain education in Veterans (2020) · cites this paper as [41]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“As such, our findings are in accordance with the theory that being mindful helps one encounter the pain experience without unnecessary elaboration, catastrophizing, or reactivity.10,15,50”
From Mindful attention is inversely associated with pain via mediation by psychological distress in orthopedic patients. (2024) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being
Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822 · Cited by 13,448
Pain mechanisms: a new theory.
Melzack, R., & Wall, P. D. (1965) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.150.3699.971 · Cited by 11,108
Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.bpg016 · Cited by 8,615
Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy/bpg016 · Cited by 8,612
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation.
Sullivan, M. J. L., Bishop, S. R., & Pivik, J. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037//1040-3590.7.4.524 · Cited by 8,227
Using Self-Report Assessment Methods to Explore Facets of Mindfulness
Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191105283504 · Cited by 7,511
(2008) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,477
Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition.
Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., Segal, Z. V., Abbey, S., Speca, M., Velting, D., et al. (2004) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.bph077 · Cited by 7,234
Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes
Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006 · Cited by 6,587
(1999) · Cited by 5,934
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 120 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Nash-McFerron, 2006, Mindfulness in the treatment of chronic headache pain, Diss Abstracts Int, 67
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mindfulness meditation-based pain relief: a mechanistic account
Zeidan, F., & Vago, D. R. (2016) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.13153 · Cited by 300
Haugmark, T., Hagen, K. B., Smedslund, G., & Zangi, H. A. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221897 · Cited by 161
Mindfulness-based and acceptance-based interventions in sport and performance contexts
Gardner, F. L., & Moore, Z. E. (2017) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.06.001 · Cited by 92
Day, M. A., Ward, L. C., Ehde, D. M., Thorn, B. E., Burns, J., Barnier, A., Mattingley, J. B., & Jensen, M. P. (2019) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pny273 · Cited by 91
Self-citationJensen, M. P., Ehde, D. M., & Day, M. A. (2016) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2016.02.001 · Cited by 77
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Day, M. A., Jensen, M. P., Ehde, D. M., & Thorn, B. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- University of Alabama (US)
- Corresponding author
- Day, Melissa A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pain
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 691-703
- ISSN
- 1526-5900 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031124602
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 120
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 15.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Multiple Sclerosis Society
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Keywords
- mindfulness-based interventions, chronic pain, pain management, mechanisms of change, theoretical model, psychosocial interventions, mindfulness
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Models, Theoretical, Chronic Pain, Pain Management, Mindfulness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
