Mindful attention is inversely associated with pain via mediation by psychological distress in orthopedic patients.
Open accessAbstract
Background Orthopedic patients report pain as their main symptom complaint. Subjective pain experience is correlated with self-reported psychological state, such as distress. Purpose This study tests whether scores from a measure of mindful attention are associated with subjective pain levels and whether psychological distress scores function as a mediation path. Methods During routine visits to a single orthopedic clinic in East Los Angeles, California, 525 patients were recruited to participate in the study. Participants reported on measures of pain (Universal Pain Assessment Tool [UPAT]), mindful attention (Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire [FFMQ]), and psychological distress (Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale [DASS]). We used Pearson correlations to examine relationships between FFMQ and UPAT scores and mediation analyses to test indirect effects of DASS scores as a mediation path. Results The average age of the sample was 54 years (range 18–98 years), 61% were male, and 64% were non-Hispanic White individuals. The locations of injury were the shoulder (72%), elbow (21%), and clavicle or wrist (7%). Ninety-one percent reported mild or greater pain in the prior 2 weeks (mean = 4.2 ± 2.5, range 0–10), and 49% reported mild or more severe distress symptoms (DASS: 13.0 ± 11.5). FFMQ scores inversely predicted UPAT scores (β = –0.22, P < .01), mediated through DASS scores. DASS subscale scores for depression (β = –0.10, P = .02) and stress (β = –0.08, P = .04) but not anxiety (β = –0.03, P = .33) produced significant indirect effects. FFMQ acting-with-awareness and non-judging subscales had the largest effect on depression and stress DASS subscale scores. Conclusions We find statistical support to suggest that distress—particularly depressed mood and stress—mediates the association between mindful attention and pain intensity among orthopedic patients. A disposition of mindful attention might counter distress ailments that exacerbate subjective pain, and this has possible implications for mindfulness training interventions offered to orthopedic patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
10 of 33 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Studies have demonstrated links between mindfulness and psychological processes involved in pain-related distress, including pain catastrophizing, depression, and anxiety.
“Other studies have demonstrated the links between mindfulness and psychological processes involved in pain-related distress, including pain catastrophizing, 19,20,23 depression, 16,22 and anxiety.11,16”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 6 sources checked- cites [19] Schutze, 2010, Low mindfulness predicts pain catastrophizing in a fear-avoidance model of chronic pain, Pain. source
- cites [20] Komandur, 2018, Mindfulness and chronic headache/migraine: mechanisms explored through the fear-avoidance model of chronic pain, Clin J Pain source
- cites [23] Brooks, 2018, Perceived mindfulness and depressive symptoms among people with chronic pain, J Rehabil
- cites [16] McCracken, 2007, The role of mindfulness in a contextual cognitive-behavioral analysis of chronic pain-related suffering and disability, Pain. source
- cites [22] Elvery, 2017, Pain catastrophizing, mindfulness, and pain acceptance: what’s the difference?, Clin J Pain source
- cites [11] Curtin, 2017, The relationship between chronic musculoskeletal pain, anxiety and mindfulness: adjustments to the fear-avoidance model of chronic pain, Scand J Pain source
- Interpretationreasoning
The findings are in accordance with the theory that being mindful helps one encounter the pain experience without unnecessary elaboration, catastrophizing, or reactivity.
“As such, our findings are in accordance with the theory that being mindful helps one encounter the pain experience without unnecessary elaboration, catastrophizing, or reactivity.10,15,50”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [10] Keefe, 2004, Psychological aspects of persistent pain: current state of the science, J Pain source
The Acceptance discussion (page unavailable in our copy) describes acceptance as a way to avoid repeated struggles with pain and reports a meditation-based protocol designed to enhance acceptance. It does not say that mindfulness prevents elaboration, catastrophizing, or reactivity to pain; its discussion of catastrophizing is separate. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [15] Day, 2014, Toward a theoretical model for mindfulness-based pain management, J Pain source
- cites [50] Veehof, 2016, Acceptance- and mindfulness-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: a meta-analytic review, Cogn Behav Ther source
The KEYWORDS section defines mindfulness in terms of nonjudgmental awareness and nonreactivity, and Main findings suggests that acceptance may help people experience pain without treating it as something to avoid immediately. The paper does not describe mindfulness as preventing unnecessary elaboration or catastrophizing; Conclusions and recommendations discusses catastrophizing chiefly as a proposed CBT mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- The authors state this as an assumption: Mindfulness could modify pain perception and the elaboration of emotions surrounding the experience of pain.
- Interpretationcitation
Mindfulness's role as a buffer against negative affect associated with pain could provide a positive psychological adjustment to patients experiencing these types of pain-associated psychological symptoms.
“Mindfulness's role as a buffer against negative affect (ie, distress or catastrophizing) associated with pain could provide a positive psychological adjustment to patients experiencing these types of painassociated psychological symptoms.48,49”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [48] Poulin, 2016, The relationship between mindfulness, pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, depression, and quality of life among cancer survivors living with chronic neuropathic pain, Support Care Cancer source
- cites [49] Dorado, 2018, Interactive effects of pain catastrophizing and mindfulness on pain intensity in women with fibromyalgia, Health Psychol Open source
The Discussion reports that the Observe facet of mindfulness reduced the association between catastrophizing and pain intensity in women with fibromyalgia. But it also reports that non-judgment and awareness may amplify that association. The paper therefore supports a possible buffering role for some mindfulness facets, not mindfulness generally; it did not establish positive psychological adjustment as an outcome. Page numbers were not supplied. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- The authors state this as an assumption: Mindfulness could modify pain perception and the elaboration of emotions surrounding the experience of pain.
- Premisecitation
A negative cycle can develop between distress and pain, causing further deterioration in one's health and ability to seek proper treatment.
“As has been noted, 53 a negative cycle can develop between distress and pain, causing further deterioration in one's health and ability to seek proper treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] Duffield, 2017, The contribution of musculoskeletal disorders in multimorbidity: implications for practice and policy, Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol source
- Findingown data
UPAT was moderately negatively correlated with FFMQ non-judging (r = -0.21).
“UPAT was moderately correlated with all 3 domains of DASS (depression: r ¼ 0.39; anxiety: r ¼ 0.35; stress: r ¼ 0.38), was weakly and negatively correlated with FFMQ describing (r ¼ -0.14) and non-reactivity (r ¼ -0.13), and was moderately correlated with non-judging (r ¼ -0.21).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
Data on primary injury location and race/ethnicity were not missing completely at random (MCAR).
“We conducted Little's test and found that data on primary injury location and race/ethnicity were not missing completely at random (MCAR).38”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Li, 2013, Little’s test of missing completely at random, Stata J source
- Findingown data
FFMQ sum score was negatively correlated with UPAT (r = -0.23).
“The predictor, FFMQ sum score, was negatively correlated with the outcome, UPAT (r ¼ -0.23).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
UPAT was moderately correlated with all 3 domains of DASS (depression r = 0.39; anxiety r = 0.35; stress r = 0.38).
“UPAT was moderately correlated with all 3 domains of DASS (depression: r ¼ 0.39; anxiety: r ¼ 0.35; stress: r ¼ 0.38), was weakly and negatively correlated with FFMQ describing (r ¼ -0.14) and non-reactivity (r ¼ -0.13), and was moderately correlated with non-judging (r ¼ -0.21).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
FFMQ sum score was negatively correlated with DASS sum score (r = -0.53).
“FFMQ sum score was also negatively correlated with the mediator DASS sum score (r ¼ -0.53).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
DASS sum score was positively correlated with UPAT (r = 0.42).
“DASS sum score was positively correlated with UPAT (r ¼ 0.42).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Repeating the mediation analysis with complete cases (n = 245) showed a significant indirect effect between FFMQ sum score and UPAT (b = -0.20, P < 0.01).
“Repeating the same mediation analysis in Figure 1 with complete cases (n ¼ 245) showed a significant indirect effect (b ¼ -0.20, P < 0.01) between FFMQ sum score and UPAT, whereas the direct effect was not significant (b ¼ -0.03, P ¼ .70).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All 5 indirect effect pathways through anxiety were not significant.
“All 5 indirect effect pathways through anxiety were not significant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Missing data for the imputed variables are missing at random (MAR) or missing completely at random (MCAR).
- Findingown data
In our sample, the DASS stress and depression constructs were intercorrelated (r = 0.71 to 0.76).
“Considering the sizable intercorrelation (phi ¼ 0.48) between measurements of the DASS stress and depression constructs in both a previous study 31 and in our sample (r ¼ 0.71 to 0.76)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
After including DASS sum score as mediator, the direct effect of FFMQ on UPAT was no longer significant (b = 0.01, P = .90).
“We observed a significant indirect effect (b ¼ -0.22,P < .01),while the direct effect was no longer significant (b ¼ 0.01, P ¼ .90).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Missing data for the imputed variables are missing at random (MAR) or missing completely at random (MCAR).
- Findingown data
Anxiety was not a significant mediator (P = .33).
“Anxiety was not a significant mediator (P ¼ .33).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Missing data for the imputed variables are missing at random (MAR) or missing completely at random (MCAR).
- Findingown data
The depression and stress mediators contribute most to the indirect effect relative to anxiety as statistical mediators of the mindfulness-pain association.
“and that the depression and stress mediators contribute most to the indirect effect relative to anxiety as statistical mediators of the mindfulness-pain association.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
FFMQ sum score had a significant indirect effect on UPAT through DASS sum score (b = -0.22, P < .01).
“FFMQ scores inversely predicted UPAT scores (b ¼ -0.22,P < .01),mediated through DASS scores.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“We observed a significant indirect effect (b ¼ -0.22,P < .01),while the direct effect was no longer significant (b ¼ 0.01, P ¼ .90).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Missing data for the imputed variables are missing at random (MAR) or missing completely at random (MCAR).
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
In the multiple-mediation model, the sum of mediated proportions from depression, anxiety, and stress exceeded 100%.
“Our result from the multiple-mediation model shows that the sum mediated proportion from depression, anxiety, and stress exceeded 100%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
FFMQ sum score had a significant main/direct effect on UPAT (b = -0.21, P < .01).
“We observed a significant main/direct effect (b ¼ -0.21, P < .01).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Through stress, FFMQ acting-with-awareness indirectly affected UPAT (b = -0.07, 95% CI -0.13 to -0.01).
“Through stress, 3 FFMQ facets indirectly affected UPAT: acting-with-awareness (indirect effect b ¼ -0.07, 95% CI: -0.13 to -0.01), non-reactivity (indirect effect b ¼ -0.04, 95% CI: -0.07 to -0.00), and non-judging (indirect effect b ¼ -0.06, 95% CI: -0.11 to -0.01).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Missing data for the imputed variables are missing at random (MAR) or missing completely at random (MCAR).
- Findingown data
Through stress, FFMQ non-reactivity indirectly affected UPAT (b = -0.04, 95% CI -0.07 to -0.00).
“Through stress, 3 FFMQ facets indirectly affected UPAT: acting-with-awareness (indirect effect b ¼ -0.07, 95% CI: -0.13 to -0.01), non-reactivity (indirect effect b ¼ -0.04, 95% CI: -0.07 to -0.00), and non-judging (indirect effect b ¼ -0.06, 95% CI: -0.11 to -0.01).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Missing data for the imputed variables are missing at random (MAR) or missing completely at random (MCAR).
- Findingown data
Through depression, FFMQ non-judging indirectly affected UPAT (b = -0.07, 95% CI -0.14 to -0.01).
“In Table 3, results from the multiple-mediation analysis show that through depression, 2 FFMQ facets, acting-withawareness (indirect effect b ¼ -0.05, 95% CI: -0.10 to -0.00) and non-judging (indirect effect b ¼ -0.07, 95% CI: -0.14 to -0.01), indirectly affected UPAT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Missing data for the imputed variables are missing at random (MAR) or missing completely at random (MCAR).
- Findingown data
Through stress, FFMQ non-judging indirectly affected UPAT (b = -0.06, 95% CI -0.11 to -0.01).
“Through stress, 3 FFMQ facets indirectly affected UPAT: acting-with-awareness (indirect effect b ¼ -0.07, 95% CI: -0.13 to -0.01), non-reactivity (indirect effect b ¼ -0.04, 95% CI: -0.07 to -0.00), and non-judging (indirect effect b ¼ -0.06, 95% CI: -0.11 to -0.01).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Missing data for the imputed variables are missing at random (MAR) or missing completely at random (MCAR).
- Findingown data
Through depression, FFMQ acting-with-awareness indirectly affected UPAT (b = -0.05, 95% CI -0.10 to -0.00).
“In Table 3, results from the multiple-mediation analysis show that through depression, 2 FFMQ facets, acting-withawareness (indirect effect b ¼ -0.05, 95% CI: -0.10 to -0.00) and non-judging (indirect effect b ¼ -0.07, 95% CI: -0.14 to -0.01), indirectly affected UPAT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Missing data for the imputed variables are missing at random (MAR) or missing completely at random (MCAR).
- Findingown data
The acting-with-awareness and nonjudging facets of mindfulness are the most strongly associated with distress.
“Our contribution to the field is a nuanced finding that the acting-with-awareness and nonjudging facets of mindfulness are the most strongly associated with distress”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Stress scores mediated 39.6% of the total effect of FFMQ on UPAT (indirect effect b = -0.08, P = .04).
“Depression scores mediated 48.3% of the total effect of FFMQ on UPAT (indirect effect b ¼ -0.10, P ¼ .02),and stress scores mediated 39.6% (indirect effect b ¼ -0.08, P ¼ .04).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Missing data for the imputed variables are missing at random (MAR) or missing completely at random (MCAR).
- Findingown data
The sum mediated proportion was 104.2% of the total effect.
“The sum mediated proportion was 104.2% of the total effect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Missing data for the imputed variables are missing at random (MAR) or missing completely at random (MCAR).
- Findingown data
Psychological distress mediates the relationship between mindfulness disposition and pain.
“Mediation effect of psychological distress between mindfulness disposition and pain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In complete-case analysis, the direct effect of FFMQ on UPAT was not significant (b = -0.03, P = .70).
“Repeating the same mediation analysis in Figure 1 with complete cases (n ¼ 245) showed a significant indirect effect (b ¼ -0.20, P < 0.01) between FFMQ sum score and UPAT, whereas the direct effect was not significant (b ¼ -0.03, P ¼ .70).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Depression scores mediated 48.3% of the total effect of FFMQ on UPAT (indirect effect b = -0.10, P = .02).
“Depression scores mediated 48.3% of the total effect of FFMQ on UPAT (indirect effect b ¼ -0.10, P ¼ .02),and stress scores mediated 39.6% (indirect effect b ¼ -0.08, P ¼ .04).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Missing data for the imputed variables are missing at random (MAR) or missing completely at random (MCAR).
- Interpretationcitation
These results support a protective role for mindfulness in pain-related psychological distress.
“These results support a protective role for mindfulness in pain-related psychological distress.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Psychological conditions such as anxiety, depression, catastrophizing, fear, and helplessness have a well-documented association with pain severity.
“Psychological conditions such as anxiety, depression, catastrophizing, fear, and helplessness have a well-documented association with pain severity.[7][8][9][10][11][12]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7][8][9][10][11][12]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
Non-judging, non-reactivity, and acting-with-awareness drove the observed indirect effect on pain.
“An exploratory nuanced examination of FFMQ facets demonstrated that non-judging, non-reactivity, and acting-with-awareness drove the observed indirect effect on pain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Missing data for the imputed variables are missing at random (MAR) or missing completely at random (MCAR).
- Interpretationreasoning
Being non-judging of and non-reacting to the pain-associated depressive and stressful feelings could mitigate these emotions' negative impact on pain.
“Being non-judging of and non-reacting to the painassociated depressive and stressful feelings could mitigate these emotions' negative impact on pain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Mindfulness could modify pain perception and the elaboration of emotions surrounding the experience of pain.
- Premisecitation
In a previous study, the DASS stress and depression constructs had a sizable intercorrelation (phi = 0.48).
“Considering the sizable intercorrelation (phi ¼ 0.48) between measurements of the DASS stress and depression constructs in both a previous study 31 and in our sample (r ¼ 0.71 to 0.76)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Brown, 1997, Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical samples, Behav Res Ther source
- Interpretationown data
The findings provide further empirical evidence to support an indirect protective role of mindful attention on pain.
“Our findings provide further empirical evidence to support an indirect protective role of mindful attention on pain 21 , and they emphasize the importance of accounting for the presence of psychological symptoms in orthopedic patients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Nigol, 2020, The relationship between mindfulness facets, depression, pain severity and pain interference, Psychol Health Med source
- Rests on an assumption: The mediation model's assumed causal ordering (mindful attention → psychological distress → pain) is valid despite the cross-sectional design.
- Rests on an assumption: There is no unmeasured confounding of the FFMQ–DASS, DASS–UPAT, and FFMQ–UPAT relationships.
- Interpretationown data
Depression and stress drove the mediated effect between mindful attention and pain.
“Furthermore, depression and stress drove the mediated effect between mindful attention and pain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mediation model's assumed causal ordering (mindful attention → psychological distress → pain) is valid despite the cross-sectional design.
- Rests on an assumption: There is no unmeasured confounding of the FFMQ–DASS, DASS–UPAT, and FFMQ–UPAT relationships.
- Interpretationown data
The study finds statistical support to suggest that distress-particularly depressed mood and stress-mediates the association between mindful attention and pain intensity among orthopedic patients.
“We find statistical support to suggest that distress-particularly depressed mood and stress-mediates the association between mindful attention and pain intensity among orthopedic patients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mediation model's assumed causal ordering (mindful attention → psychological distress → pain) is valid despite the cross-sectional design.
- Rests on an assumption: There is no unmeasured confounding of the FFMQ–DASS, DASS–UPAT, and FFMQ–UPAT relationships.
- Interpretationown data
A disposition toward mindful attention might function on distress to reduce subjective pain levels.
“A disposition toward mindful attention might function on distress to reduce subjective pain levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The findings provide new insights to support the idea that psychological distress mediates the relation between mindful attention and pain.
“Our findings provide new insights to support the idea that psychological distress mediates the relation between mindful attention and pain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mediation model's assumed causal ordering (mindful attention → psychological distress → pain) is valid despite the cross-sectional design.
- Rests on an assumption: There is no unmeasured confounding of the FFMQ–DASS, DASS–UPAT, and FFMQ–UPAT relationships.
- Study design and conductown data
A sensitivity analysis using complete cases confirmed that their results were consistent compared with the imputed datasets.
“We took caution with our imputed data findings by running a sensitivity analysis using complete cases and confirmed that our results were consistent compared with the imputed datasets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 41
- May combine two claims. 17
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe survey design relied on self-report metrics, which could introduce biases in the reporting of psychological distress and physical pain, given their known association, and can be dependent on the time of survey response.
“Our survey design relied on self-report metrics, which could introduce biases in the reporting of psychological distress and physical pain, given their known association, and can be dependent on the time of survey response.56”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [56] Linton, 2011, Impact of psychological factors in the experience of pain, Phys Ther source
The “Emotions and their regulation” section links psychological distress with pain, reporting that depression is associated with higher pain intensity. The paper does not address whether self-report surveys introduce reporting bias or whether responses depend on the time of survey completion. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationItem-level imputation is often the preferred method, but a simplified approach using the subscale total for imputation has been suggested.
“Although we were fully aware that item-level imputation is often the preferred method, 45,55 a simplified approach using the subscale total for imputation has been suggested, 45 which we used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe presence of psychological conditions such as depression is well established in patients experiencing musculoskeletal pain.
“The presence of psychological conditions such as depression is well established in patients experiencing musculoskeletal pain.2,53”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe sum mediated proportion exceeding 100% could be due to mediators affecting one another, interaction between mediators affecting the outcome, or other mediators with a negative proportion being unaccounted for in the model.
“This observation is possible and could be due to 3 factors: (1) mediators affecting one another, (2) interaction between mediators affecting the outcome, or (3) other mediators with a”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] VanderWeele, 2014, Mediation analysis with multiple mediators, Epidemiol Methods source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe analysis included 525 unique adult orthopedic patients who returned the survey.
“Our analysis included 525 unique adult orthopedic patients who returned the survey.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants reported the presence of distress (DASS sum score mean 13.0, SD 11.5), with 49% overall reporting at least a mild level of depression, anxiety, or stress.
“Participants also reported the presence of distress (DASS sum score: mean 6 SD ¼ 13.0 6 11.5), with 49% overall reporting at least a mild level of depression (subscale score !5; 30.5%), anxiety (subscale score !4; 34.5%), or stress (subscale score !8; 30.0%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataUPAT was weakly negatively correlated with FFMQ non-reactivity (r = -0.13).
“UPAT was moderately correlated with all 3 domains of DASS (depression: r ¼ 0.39; anxiety: r ¼ 0.35; stress: r ¼ 0.38), was weakly and negatively correlated with FFMQ describing (r ¼ -0.14) and non-reactivity (r ¼ -0.13), and was moderately correlated with non-judging (r ¼ -0.21).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataUPAT was weakly negatively correlated with FFMQ describing (r = -0.14).
“UPAT was moderately correlated with all 3 domains of DASS (depression: r ¼ 0.39; anxiety: r ¼ 0.35; stress: r ¼ 0.38), was weakly and negatively correlated with FFMQ describing (r ¼ -0.14) and non-reactivity (r ¼ -0.13), and was moderately correlated with non-judging (r ¼ -0.21).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataNinety-one percent of participants who responded to the pain item reported at least a mild level of pain in the prior 2 weeks, with UPAT scoring of 1 or greater (mean 4.2, SD 2.5).
“Ninety-one percent of participants who responded to the pain item reported at least a mild level of pain in the prior 2 weeks, with UPAT scoring of 1 or greater (UPAT: mean 6 SD ¼ 4.2 6 2.5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataMale sex was correlated with lower levels of pain (r = -0.15).
“For other covariates, male sex was correlated with lower levels of pain (r ¼ -0.15), while age was positively correlated with FFMQ sum score (r ¼ 0.15) and FFMQ act-with-awareness (r ¼ 0.11) and was negatively correlated with male sex (r ¼ -0.15).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAge was positively correlated with FFMQ sum score (r = 0.15).
“For other covariates, male sex was correlated with lower levels of pain (r ¼ -0.15), while age was positively correlated with FFMQ sum score (r ¼ 0.15) and FFMQ act-with-awareness (r ¼ 0.11) and was negatively correlated with male sex (r ¼ -0.15).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSensitivity analysis including primary injury location and race/ethnicity produced results not different from the primary findings.
“The results were not different from the primary findings in Figure 1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataModel fit statistics showed low non-normalized RMSE (depression 0.75, anxiety 0.80, stress 0.79) and moderate R-squared values (depression 0.38, anxiety 0.30, stress 0.34), indicating good model fit for the multiple-mediation analysis.
“The analysis showed that all 3 mediation pathways had low non- normalized Root Mean Square Error (depression ¼ 0.75, anxiety ¼ 0.80, stress ¼ 0.79) and moderate R-squared values (depression ¼ 0.38, anxiety ¼ 0.30, stress ¼ 0.34), which indicated a good model fit for our multiple-mediation analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataThe proportion mediated by different distress domains between mindfulness disposition and pain was estimated in a multiple-mediation model.
“Proportion mediated by different distress domains between mindfulness disposition and pain in a multiple-mediation model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAge was negatively correlated with male sex (r = -0.15).
“For other covariates, male sex was correlated with lower levels of pain (r ¼ -0.15), while age was positively correlated with FFMQ sum score (r ¼ 0.15) and FFMQ act-with-awareness (r ¼ 0.11) and was negatively correlated with male sex (r ¼ -0.15).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAge was positively correlated with FFMQ act-with-awareness (r = 0.11).
“For other covariates, male sex was correlated with lower levels of pain (r ¼ -0.15), while age was positively correlated with FFMQ sum score (r ¼ 0.15) and FFMQ act-with-awareness (r ¼ 0.11) and was negatively correlated with male sex (r ¼ -0.15).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe DASS showed high internal consistency in the sample (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89).
“We observed high internal consistency in our sample (Cronbach's a ¼ 0.89).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe FFMQ showed high internal consistency in the sample (Cronbach's alpha = 0.87).
“We observed high internal consistency in our sample (Cronbach's a ¼ 0.87).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataAge and sex were controlled for in the analytic models.
“We controlled for age and sex in the analytic models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataA sensitivity analysis using complete cases was conducted and compared with the imputed data.
“Finally, we conducted a sensitivity analysis using complete cases and compared results with the imputed data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPsychological distress is common among orthopedic patients.
“Psychological distress, defined as a discomforting emotional state experienced in response to a stressor like pain, 5 is common among orthopedic patients 6 and plays an important role in modulating the affective experience of pain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Castillo, 2016, Pain and psychological distress following orthopedic trauma: a call for collaborative models of care, Tech Orthop source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMindfulness facets, including observing and describing, predicted pain intensity, while non-reactivity and non-judging predicted depression.
“Another study found that mindfulness facets, including observing and describing, predicted pain intensity, while non-reactivity and non-judging predicted depression.22”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Elvery, 2017, Pain catastrophizing, mindfulness, and pain acceptance: what’s the difference?, Clin J Pain source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationMindfulness facets, including non-judgment, non-reactivity, and describing, influence pain severity through their effects on depression.
“One proposed path model is based on data showing that mindfulness facets, including non-judgment, non-reactivity, and describing, influence pain severity through their effects on depression.21”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Nigol, 2020, The relationship between mindfulness facets, depression, pain severity and pain interference, Psychol Health Med source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationBeing mindful might help a patient experience the basic sensory elements of physical pain without unnecessary cognitive elaboration, catastrophizing, or reactivity.
“This attentional stance is relevant to the pain experience, as being mindful might help a patient experience the basic sensory elements of physical pain without unnecessary cognitive elaboration, catastrophizing, or reactivity.10,[15][16][17]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 10,[15][16][17]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe underlying mechanisms of change for mindfulness as a protective factor against pain remain to be determined.
“Although studies have examined mindfulness as a protective factor against the experience of pain, 11,[18][19][20] the underlying mechanisms of change remain to be determined.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 11,[18][19][20]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMost orthopedic patients present with a chief complaint of pain.
“Most orthopedic patients present with a chief complaint of pain.[1][2][3]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1][2][3]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningConvenience sampling might have introduced self-selection bias, yielding a sample that could have been healthier or had greater levels of trust in medical care and research.
“Convenience sampling might have introduced selfselection bias, yielding a sample that could have been healthier or had greater levels of trust in medical care and research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe process of reperceiving could disrupt the distress-pain cycle or compete against rumination from pain catastrophizing.
“This process could disrupt the distress-pain cycle or compete against rumination from pain catastrophizing.48”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] Poulin, 2016, The relationship between mindfulness, pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, depression, and quality of life among cancer survivors living with chronic neuropathic pain, Support Care Cancer source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningImputing FFMQ and DASS scales at the domain level did not fully utilize the information available at the item level.
“Although imputing FFMQ and DASS scales at the domain level did not fully utilize the information that was available at the item level (ie, any item missing was treated as the domain missing)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThey encountered issues with missing data, including the primary outcome.
“For data validity, we encountered issues with missing data, including the primary outcome.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningOur results offer additional mechanistic details to the design of specific mindfulness-facet-by-distress-type interventions for orthopedic populations.
“As more mind-body therapies target psychological symptoms for pain management, 54 our results offer additional mechanistic details to the design of specific mindfulness-facet-by-distress-type interventions for orthopedic populations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] Rajguru, 2015, Use of mindfulness meditation in the management of chronic pain a systematic review of randomized controlled trials, Am J Lifestyle Med source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationIndividuals with higher mindful awareness and less judgmental affect might be able to shift their thoughts and observe their emotions toward pain differently (reperceiving).
“Individuals with higher mindful awareness and less judgmental affect might be able to shift their thoughts and observe their emotions toward pain differently, a notion of reperceiving suggested by Day et al. 15”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Day et al. 15
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe inclusion of years since diagnosis and years of pain patients experienced would be important clinical factors to consider.
“Though not available in the present data, the inclusion of years since diagnosis and years of pain patients experienced would be important clinical factors to consider.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataOur findings support mindfulness as a positive psychological disposition varying in orthopedic patients that can possibly be targeted to ameliorate distress and subjective pain levels.
“Our findings support mindfulness as a positive psychological disposition varying in orthopedic patients that can possibly be targeted to ameliorate distress and subjective pain levels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThey recruited a large study sample to increase the variance of the subject pool and diversify the responses.
“To address some of these potential issues, we recruited a large study sample to increase the variance of the subject pool and diversify the responses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIt is possible that the DASS stress and depression mediators affected one another or interacted to affect the outcome pain.
“it is possible that these mediators affected one another or interacted to affect the outcome pain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMindfulness disposition might change the psychological processes of pain perception, which warrants the mediation analysis approach.
“However, mindfulness disposition might change the psychological processes of pain perception, which warrants the mediation analysis approach.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Mindfulness could modify pain perception and the elaboration of emotions surrounding the experience of pain.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataOur results confirm the observation of a negative cycle and identify that mindfulness disposition could affect the distress-pain relation.
“Our results confirm this observation and identify that mindfulness disposition could affect the distress-pain relation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataA disposition of mindful attention might counter distress ailments that exacerbate subjective pain, and this has possible implications for mindfulness training interventions offered to orthopedic patients.
“A disposition of mindful attention might counter distress ailments that exacerbate subjective pain, and this has possible implications for mindfulness training interventions offered to orthopedic patients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Mindfulness could modify pain perception and the elaboration of emotions surrounding the experience of pain.
- Rests on an assumption: The mediation model's assumed causal ordering (mindful attention → psychological distress → pain) is valid despite the cross-sectional design.
- Rests on an assumption: There is no unmeasured confounding of the FFMQ–DASS, DASS–UPAT, and FFMQ–UPAT relationships.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study recruited from a single nonprofit teaching hospital.
“The study recruited from a single nonprofit teaching hospital.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThey tested the mediation analysis using cross-sectional data, which is controversial and can limit the ability to infer causality for the observed effects.
“In addition, we tested the mediation analysis using cross-sectional data, which is controversial and can limit our ability infer causality for the observed effects 57 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] Maxwell, 2007, Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation, Psychol Methods source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataHigher mindfulness disposition correlates with lower pain levels, with psychological distress as the statistical mediator.
“Our findings showed that higher mindfulness disposition correlates with lower pain levels, with psychological distress as the statistical mediator.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mediation model's assumed causal ordering (mindful attention → psychological distress → pain) is valid despite the cross-sectional design.
- Rests on an assumption: There is no unmeasured confounding of the FFMQ–DASS, DASS–UPAT, and FFMQ–UPAT relationships.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningUsing the subscale total for imputation reduced the imputation model size, with the potential tradeoff of losing the ability to further explore individual items.
“This allowed us to reduce the imputation model size, with the potential tradeoff of losing the ability to further explore individual items.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationExamining the presence of distress among patients with pain conditions, and the associated mechanisms of action, are among the nation's top research priorities.
“Examining the presence of distress among patients with pain conditions, and the associated mechanisms of action, are among the nation's top research priorities.60”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [60] Interagency Pain Research Coordinating Committee, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThey performed multiple imputation to produce an estimation of the full sample.
“To remedy, we performed multiple imputation so that we could produce an estimation of the full sample.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataTheir initial attempt using individual items failed to converge because of a large volume of scale items (FFMQ: 24 items; DASS: 21 items).
“our initial attempt using individual items failed to converge because of a large volume of scale items (FFMQ: 24 items; DASS: 21 items).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe selective patient cohort and the undifferentiated nature of the orthopedic sample could limit the external validity and generalizability of the findings.
“The selective patient cohort and the undifferentiated nature of the orthopedic sample could limit the external validity and generalizability of the findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
Mindfulness could modify pain perception and the elaboration of emotions surrounding the experience of pain.
“This is under the premise that mindfulness could modify pain perception and the elaboration of emotions surrounding the experience of pain.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The mediation model's assumed causal ordering (mindful attention → psychological distress → pain) is valid despite the cross-sectional design.
“Our model proposes that psychological distress mediates an association between mindful attention and experienced pain.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is no unmeasured confounding of the FFMQ–DASS, DASS–UPAT, and FFMQ–UPAT relationships.
“We controlled for age and sex in the analytic models.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Missing data for the imputed variables are missing at random (MAR) or missing completely at random (MCAR).
“We performed multiple imputation and ran all mediation analyses using the imputed datasets.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The single-site sample is representative of orthopedic patients generally.
“We conducted a single-site cross-sectional survey in 2015.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
The imputation description conflicts on excluded fields
MinorThe methods say all data fields were imputed, whereas the results say injury location and race/ethnicity were initially excluded from imputation.
“we imputed all data fields regardless of the amount of missingness.”
“In addition, we conducted a sensitivity analysis by including primary injury location and race/ethnicity, given that they were initially excluded from the imputation because of their missing data patterns.”
Cites
An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias
Zellner, A. (1962) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1962.10480664 · Cited by 8,138 · see citing works
Using Self-Report Assessment Methods to Explore Facets of Mindfulness
Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191105283504 · Cited by 7,511 · see citing works
Sterne, J. A. C., White, I. R., Carlin, J. B., Spratt, M., Royston, P., Kenward, M. G., Wood, A. M., & Carpenter, J. R. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2393 · Cited by 7,299 · see citing works
(1995) · Cited by 6,909 · see citing works
Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world
Graham, J. W. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530 · Cited by 6,163 · see citing works
Henry, J. D., & Crawford, J. R. (2005) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466505x29657 · Cited by 5,801 · see citing works
Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions.
Woolf, A., & Pfleger, B. (2003) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.1590/s0042-96862003000900007 · Cited by 3,873
Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions.
(2003) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 3,521 · see citing works
Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation
Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.12.1.23 · Cited by 3,401 · see citing works
The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: Scientific advances and future directions.
Gatchel, R. J., Peng, Y. B., Peters, M. L., Fuchs, P. N., & Turk, D. C. (2007) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.581 · Cited by 3,392 · see citing works
Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers
Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069 · Cited by 2,860 · see citing works
Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings
Fillingim, R. B., King, C. D., Ribeiro-Dasilva, M. C., Rahim-Williams, B., & Riley, J. L. (2009) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2008.12.001 · Cited by 2,766 · see citing works
Mediation Analysis in Social Psychology: Current Practices and New Recommendations
Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2011) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x · Cited by 2,430 · see citing works
Depression Anxiety Stress Scales
Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (2011) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t01004-000 · Cited by 2,416 · see citing works
Sex differences in pain: a brief review of clinical and experimental findings
Bartley, E. J., & Fillingim, R. B. (2013) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aet127 · Cited by 2,168 · see citing works
Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical samples
Brown, T. A., Chorpita, B. F., Korotitsch, W., & Barlow, D. H. (1997) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(96)00068-x · Cited by 1,860 · see citing works
Best practices for missing data management in counseling psychology
Schlomer, G. L., Bauman, S., & Card, N. A. (2010) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0018082 · Cited by 1,835 · see citing works
Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales.
Dl, W., & Cm, B. (1988) · PubMed · Cited by 1,619 · see citing works
An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias
Zellner, A. (1962) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2281644 · Cited by 1,538 · see citing works
Pain catastrophizing: a critical review.
Quartana, P. J., Campbell, C. M., & Edwards, R. R. (2009) · Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1586/ern.09.34 · Cited by 1,405 · see citing works
Bohlmeijer, E., ten Klooster, P. M., Fledderus, M., Veehof, M., & Baer, R. (2011) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191111408231 · Cited by 990 · see citing works
Ludwig, D. S. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.300.11.1350 · Cited by 957 · see citing works
Psychological aspects of persistent pain: Current state of the science
Keefe, F. J., Rumble, M. E., Scipio, C. D., Giordano, L. A., & Perri, L. M. (2004) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.576 · Cited by 897 · see citing works
Mediation analysis with multiple mediators
VanderWeele, T., & Vansteelandt, S. (2014) · Epidemiologic Methods · doi:10.1515/em-2012-0010 · Cited by 858 · see citing works
Psychological distress: concept analysis
Ridner, S. H. (2004) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02938.x · Cited by 822 · see citing works
Impact of psychological factors in the experience of pain
Linton, S. J., & Shaw, W. S. (2011) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20100330 · Cited by 819 · see citing works
Ohnhaus, E. E., & Adler, R. (1975) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(75)90075-5 · Cited by 797 · see citing works
Lee, K. J., & Carlin, J. (2010) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwp425 · Cited by 787 · see citing works
Veehof, M. M., Trompetter, H. R., Bohlmeijer, E. T., & Schreurs, K. M. G. (2016) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506073.2015.1098724 · Cited by 737 · see citing works
Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales.
Wong, D. L., & Baker, C. M. (1988) · PubMed · Cited by 651 · see citing works
Little’s test of missing completely at random
Li, C. (2013) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x1301300407 · Cited by 608 · see citing works
Bair, M. J., Wu, J., Damush, T. M., Sutherland, J. M., & Kroenke, K. (2008) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0b013e318185c510 · Cited by 572 · see citing works
The burden of musculoskeletal diseases in the United States
Yelin, E., Weinstein, S., & King, T. (2016) · Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism · doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.07.013 · Cited by 537 · see citing works
Lautenbacher, S., Peters, J. H., Heesen, M., Scheel, J., & Kunz, M. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.039 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
Cross-Sectional Analysis of Longitudinal Mediation Processes
O'Laughlin, K. D., Martin, M. J., & Ferrer, E. (2018) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2018.1454822 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
Prevalence of self reported musculoskeletal diseases is high
Picavet, H. S. J., & Hazes, J. M. W. (2003) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/ard.62.7.644 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
McCracken, L. M., Gauntlett-Gilbert, J., & Vowles, K. E. (2007) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2006.12.013 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Edwards, R. R., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Sullivan, M. J., & Fillingim, R. B. (2004) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2004.07.012 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Low mindfulness predicts pain catastrophizing in a fear-avoidance model of chronic pain
Schütze, R., Rees, C., Preece, M., & Schütze, M. (2010) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2009.10.030 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
A comparison of item-level and scale-level multiple imputation for questionnaire batteries
Gottschall, A. C., West, S. G., & Enders, C. K. (2012) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.640589 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Duffield, S. J., Ellis, B. M., Goodson, N., Walker-Bone, K., Conaghan, P. G., Margham, T., & Loftis, T. (2017) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1016/j.berh.2017.09.004 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Age and race effects on pain sensitivity and modulation among middle-aged and older adults
Riley, J. L., Cruz-Almeida, Y., Glover, T. L., King, C. D., Goodin, B. R., Sibille, K. T., Bartley, E. J., Herbert, M. S., Sotolongo, A., Fessler, B. J., et al. (2014) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2013.10.015 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Castillo, R. C., Wegener, S. T., Heins, S. E., Haythornthwaite, J. A., MacKenzie, E. J., & Bosse, M. J. (2013) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2013.08.025 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Prakash, R. S., Hussain, M. A., & Schirda, B. (2015) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0038544 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Visual analogue measurement of pain.
Campbell, W., & Lewis, S. (1990) · PubMed Central · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Toward a theoretical model for mindfulness-based pain management
Day, M. A., Jensen, M. P., Ehde, D. M., & Thorn, B. E. (2014) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2014.03.003 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Poulin, P. A., Romanow, H. C., Rahbari, N., Small, R., Smyth, C. E., Hatchard, T., Solomon, B. K., Song, X., Harris, C. A., Kowal, J., et al. (2016) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-016-3243-x · Cited by 89 · see citing works
A call for standardizing the clinical rating of pain intensity using a 0 to 10 rating scale
Dalton, J. A., & McNaull, F. W. (1998) · Cancer Nursing · doi:10.1097/00002820-199802000-00006 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Multiple imputation of multiple multi-item scales when a full imputation model is infeasible
Plumpton, C. O., Morris, T., Hughes, D. A., & White, I. R. (2016) · BMC Research Notes · doi:10.1186/s13104-016-1853-5 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Mindfulness is associated with psychological health and moderates pain in knee osteoarthritis
Lee, A. C., Harvey, W. F., Price, L. L., Morgan, L. P. K., Morgan, N. L., & Wang, C. (2017) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2016.06.017 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Ullrich, P. M., Turner, J. A., Ciol, M., & Berger, R. (2005) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15324796abm3002_3 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Pain Catastrophizing, Mindfulness, and Pain Acceptance
Elvery, N., Jensen, M. P., Ehde, D. M., & Day, M. A. (2017) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0000000000000430 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Curtin, K. B., & Norris, D. (2017) · Scandinavian Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.08.006 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Dorado, K., Schreiber, K. L., Koulouris, A., Edwards, R. R., Napadow, V., & Lazaridou, A. (2018) · Health Psychology Open · doi:10.1177/2055102918807406 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
An investigation of the associations between measures of mindfulness and pain catastrophizing
Day, M. A., Smitherman, A., Ward, L. C., & Thorn, B. E. (2015) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0000000000000102 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
The relationship between mindfulness facets, depression, pain severity and pain interference
Nigol, S. H., & Di Benedetto, M. (2020) · Psychology, Health & Medicine · doi:10.1080/13548506.2019.1619786 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Rajguru, P., Kolber, M. J., Garcia, A. N., Smith, M. T., Patel, C. K., & Hanney, W. J. (2015) · American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine · doi:10.1177/1559827614522580 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Komandur, B., Martin, P. R., & Bandarian-Balooch, S. (2018) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0000000000000580 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Beks, R. B., Mellema, J. J., Menendez, M. E., Chen, N. C., Ring, D., & Vranceanu, A. M. (2018) · HAND · doi:10.1177/1558944717697429 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Pain and psychological distress following orthopedic trauma: a call for collaborative models of care
Castillo, R. C., Archer, K. R., Bradford Newcomb, A., & Wegener, S. T. (2016) · Techniques in Orthopaedics · doi:10.1097/bto.0000000000000200 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Perceived Mindfulness and Depressive Symptoms Among People with Chronic Pain.
(2018) · PubMed · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- StataCorp, 2017, Stata Statistical Software: Release 15
- Interagency Pain Research Coordinating Committee, 2017, Federal Pain Research Strategy
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Amanambu, P. N., Ifeagwazi, C. M., Chukwuorji, J. C., Obi-keguna, C. N., Igwe, E. J., & Onu, D. U. (2025) · South African Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1177/00812463251350779 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Studies (e.g., Brooks et al., 2020; Carvalho et al., 2018; Heath et al., 2016; Lam et al., 2024) have indicated a direct relationship between mindful dispositions and depressive symptoms in both clinical and non-clinical settings, including among orthopedic patients, across the United States,…”
Cai, S. J., 商丽云, & Yan, L. P. C. (2026) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.21393
“They may avoid or exaggerate pain, in part because they have difficulty accurately perceiving their internal state ( Lam et al., 2024 ).”
- Authors
- Lam, C. N., Larach, D. B., Chou, C.-P., & Black, D. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lam, Chun Nok
- Venue
- Pain Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2023-08-29
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-70
- ISSN
- 1526-2375 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4637
- PMC
- PMC10765158
- OpenAlex
- W4386241078
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Pain Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Southern California Zumberge Interdisciplinary Grant
- American Mindfulness Research Association
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (K23DA057387)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Keywords
- mindful attention, pain intensity, psychological distress, depression, stress, orthopedic patients, mediation, mindfulness training, musculoskeletal pain, shoulder pain
- MeSH terms
- Psychological Distress, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Attention, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult, Mindfulness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review