The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
United States national pain strategy for population research: concepts, definitions, and pilot data.
Open accessAbstract
Unlabelled National Pain Strategy population research objectives include: estimating chronic pain prevalence, studying pain treatment with electronic health care data, and developing metrics to assess progress in reducing chronic pain impact. In this article, the National Pain Strategy Population Research Workgroup reviews concepts relevant to achieving these aims. High-impact chronic pain was defined as persistent pain with substantial restriction of life activities lasting 6 months or more. In pilot work, we tested a brief assessment of high-impact chronic pain, and used electronic health records data to describe pain-related health care. A mail survey of adult health plan enrollees (N = 770) reported that 14% had high-impact chronic pain. Relative to persons with lower-impact chronic pain, those with high-impact chronic pain were more often frequent users of health care for pain, reported lower quality of life, greater pain-related interference with activities, and more often reported pain at multiple anatomic locations. Analyses of health care data (N = 289,464) reported that pain patients had higher health care costs compared with others and that pain services were typically delivered in primary care. These results support the feasibility of developing data on chronic pain through national health interview surveys and large electronic health care databases.Perspective Pilot analyses supported the feasibility of brief chronic pain assessments suitable for national health surveys and use of electronic health care databases to develop data regarding trends in the delivery of pain treatments, costs, and effectiveness. These methods are relevant to achieving the aims of the US National Pain Strategy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This estimate of high-impact chronic pain is similar to or slightly lower than estimates reported in the few studies that have looked at pain using a similar construct.”
From Prevalence of Chronic Pain and High-Impact Chronic Pain Among Adults — United States, 2016 (2018) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“That this estimate is considerably lower than estimates based on pain interference11,36 is not unexpected.”
From Prevalence and Profile of High-Impact Chronic Pain in the United States (2019) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“Although conceptually appealing, this hotly debated7 approach does not consider the multidimensional nature of chronic pain, namely, the presence of activity limitations and participation restrictions,5,17,30–36 classifications recognized by the World Health Organization.37”
From Prevalence and Profile of High-Impact Chronic Pain in the United States (2019) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“To address this shortcoming, the U.S. National Pain Strategy proposed the concept of high-impact chronic pain (HICP) to better identify those with significant levels of life interference (ie, work, social, and/or self-care activities).24,36”
From Prevalence and Profile of High-Impact Chronic Pain in the United States (2019) · cites this paper as [36]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910
Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., Amtmann, D., Bode, R., Buysse, D., Choi, S., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011 · Cited by 5,128
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
Chard, G. (2004) · British Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.1177/030802260406700101 · Cited by 3,697
The PHQ-15: Validity of a New Measure for Evaluating the Severity of Somatic Symptoms
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2002) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-200203000-00008 · Cited by 3,415
Grading the severity of chronic pain
Von Korff, M., Ormel, J., Keefe, F. J., & Dworkin, S. F. (1992) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(92)90154-4 · Cited by 3,022
Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods
Collins, D. (2003) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1023/a:1023254226592 · Cited by 1,520
Serlin, R. C., Mendoza, T. R., Nakamura, Y., Edwards, K. R., & Cleeland, C. S. (1995) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(94)00178-h · Cited by 1,493
Tsang, A., Von Korff, M., Lee, S., Alonso, J., Karam, E., Angermeyer, M. C., Borges, G. L. G., Bromet, E. J., de Girolamo, G., de Graaf, R., et al. (2008) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2008.05.005 · Cited by 1,157
Estimates of Pain Prevalence and Severity in Adults: United States, 2012
Nahin, R. L. (2015) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2015.05.002 · Cited by 918 · cited 3×
“previous surveys.(3,21) Although hundreds of population surveys have been conducted to estimate the prevalence of specific chronic pain conditions(4) (for example, low back pain, migraine headache, osteoarthritis), there have been few population-based surveys of the extent and burden of chronic pain overall.”
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Saunders, 2005, Group health cooperative in Strom B, 223
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prevalence of Chronic Pain and High-Impact Chronic Pain Among Adults — United States, 2016
Dahlhamer, J., Lucas, J., Zelaya, Nahin, R., Mackey, S., DeBar, L., Kerns, R., Von Korff, M., Porter, L., & Helmick, C. (2018) · MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report · doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6736a2 · Cited by 2,598
Self-citationDavis, K. D., Aghaeepour, N., Ahn, A. H., Angst, M. S., Borsook, D., Brenton, A., Burczynski, M. E., Crean, C. S., Edwards, R. R., Gaudilliere, B. L., et al. (2020) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-020-0362-2 · Cited by 528
Self-citationPrevalence and Profile of High-Impact Chronic Pain in the United States
Pitcher, M. H., Von Korff, M., Bushnell, M. C., & Porter, L. (2019) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2018.07.006 · Cited by 470
Self-citationStevans, J. M., Delitto, A., Khoja, S. S., Patterson, C. G., Smith, C., Schneider, M., Freburger, J. K., Greco, C. M., Freel, J. A., Sowa, G., et al. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37371 · Cited by 334
Brain imaging tests for chronic pain: medical, legal and ethical issues and recommendations
Davis, K. D., Flor, H., Greely, H. T., Iannetti, G. D., Mackey, S., Ploner, M., Pustilnik, A. C., Tracey, I., Treede, R., & Wager, T. D. (2017) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2017.122 · Cited by 321
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Von Korff, M., Scher, A. I., Helmick, C., Carter-Pokras, O., Dodick, D. W., Goulet, J., Hamill-Ruth, R., LeResche, L., Porter, L., Tait, R., Terman, G., Veasley, C., & Mackey, S.
- Affiliations
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Yale University (US)
- University of Virginia Health System (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Saint Louis University (US)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journal of Pain
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1068-1080
- ISSN
- 1526-5900 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2464049161
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 12.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- NINDS
- NIH Inter-Agency Pain Research Coordinating Committee (AG034181)
- Pfizer Inc.
- Healthlogix
- Haymarket Media Group, Ltd.
- SAGE Publishing
- Synergy
- Allergan
- Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
- Oxford University Press
- Cambridge University Press
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Keywords
- chronic pain, high-impact chronic pain, health care costs, electronic health records, pain assessment tools, quality of life, primary care, health plan enrollees
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Terminology as Topic, Pain Measurement, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Design, United States, Prevalence, Databases, Factual, Health Care Costs, Young Adult, Electronic Health Records, Chronic Pain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
