Cited by 588Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentPain Management and Opioid Use

Chronic Pain Among Adults — United States, 2019–2021

Open access
Rikard, S. Michaela, Strahan, Andrea E., Schmit, Kristine M., Guy, Gery P.·2023·MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

Abstract

Chronic pain (i.e., pain lasting ≥3 months) is a debilitating condition that affects daily work and life activities for many adults in the United States and has been linked with depression (1), Alzheimer disease and related dementias (2), higher suicide risk (3), and substance use and misuse (4).During 2016, an estimated 50 million adults in the United States experienced chronic pain, resulting in substantial health care costs and lost productivity (5,6).Addressing chronic pain and improving the lives of persons living with pain is a public health imperative.Population research objectives in the National Pain Strategy, which was released in 2016 by the Interagency Pain Research Coordinating Committee, call for more precise estimates of the prevalence of chronic pain and high-impact chronic pain (i.e., chronic pain that results in substantial restriction to daily activities) in the general population and within various population groups to guide efforts to reduce the impact of chronic pain (3).Further, a 2022 review of U.S. chronic pain surveillance systems identified the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) as the best source for pain surveillance data (7).CDC analyzed data from the 2019-2021 NHIS to provide updated estimates of the prevalence of chronic pain and highimpact chronic pain among adults in the United States and within population groups defined by demographic, geographic, socioeconomic, and health status characteristics.During 2021, an estimated 20.9% of U.S. adults (51.6 million persons) experienced chronic pain, and 6.9% (17.1 million persons) experienced high-impact chronic pain.New findings from this analysis include that non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) adults, adults identifying as bisexual, and adults who are divorced or separated are among the populations experiencing a higher prevalence of chronic pain and highimpact chronic pain.Clinicians, practices, health systems, and payers should vigilantly attend to health inequities and ensure access to appropriate, affordable, diversified, coordinated, and effective pain management care for all persons (8).NHIS is a cross-sectional, household survey of the civilian, noninstitutionalized population conducted annually by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS).*Data were analyzed using the 2019-2021 Sample Adult Interviews.† Survey questions used to estimate the prevalence of pain included, "In the past three months, how often did you have pain?Would you say never, some days, most days, or every day?" and "Over the past three months, how often did your pain limit your life or work activities?Would you say never, some days, most days, INSIDE 386 Secondary Cases of Invasive Disease Caused by Encapsulated and Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae -10 U.S. Jurisdictions, 2011-2018 391 Update on Wild Poliovirus Type 1 Outbreak -Southeastern Africa, 2021-2022 398 Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Mpox Cases and Vaccination Among Adult Males -United States, May-December 2022 404 Epidemiologic and Clinical Features of Mpox-Associated Deaths -United States, May 10, 2022-March 7, 2023 411 Notes From the Field: Campylobacteriosis Outbreak Associated with Consumption of Raw Water -Montana, 2022 414 QuickStats

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15585/mmwr.mm7215a1

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the US, 30.1% of those with HICP are employed.

    “In the US, 30.1% of those with HICP are employed 2”

    From Overview and Feasibility of a Novel Transdisciplinary Integrative Approach to High Impact Chronic Pain in Vermont (2024) · cites this paper as [2]

    The 2021 prevalence table lists 5,088,000 employed adults with high-impact chronic pain, alongside 11,461,000 who had worked previously and 334,000 who had never worked. The employed group is 30.1% of those three employment-status groups combined, but the table’s overall high-impact chronic pain estimate is 17,100,000; using that denominator gives about 29.8%. The claim omits the restriction to people represented in the employment-status groups. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The mean age of the PATH participants (49.8 years) is typical of the HICP population in the US (low 50s).

    “The mean age of the PATH participants (49.8 years) is also typical of the HICP population in the US (low 50s). 2”

    From Overview and Feasibility of a Novel Transdisciplinary Integrative Approach to High Impact Chronic Pain in Vermont (2024) · cites this paper as [2]

    The 2021 prevalence table (page not specified) reports the largest estimated number of U.S. adults with high-impact chronic pain in the 45–64 age group. It does not report a mean age or establish that the population’s mean is in the low 50s, so it cannot substantiate the comparison with PATH participants. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Chronic pain is one of the most common chronic conditions in the United States, with the most recent national estimate at 20.9% of US adults.

    “Chronic pain is one of the most common chronic conditions in the United States based on multiple prevalence studies 1 with the most recent national estimate at 20.9% of US adults. 2”
  • The employment status of PATH participants is not typical of the US HICP population.

    “The employment status, however, is not typical. In the US, 30.1% of those with HICP are employed 2 while 50% of the PATH participants are employed full-time, and 17% are employed part-time.”
  • 67% of the participants were employed at least part-time versus only 30.1% of those with HICP in the US are employed.

    “67% of the participants were employed at least part-time vs only 30.1% of those with HICP in the US are employed. 2”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rikard, S. M., Strahan, A. E., Schmit, K. M., & Guy, G. P.
Affiliations
National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (US)
Corresponding author
Rikard, S. Michaela
Venue
MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
Published
2023-04-14
Volume
72
Issue
15
Pages
379-385
ISSN
  • 0149-2195 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-861X
OpenAlex
W4365442769
Cited by
588
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 144 · 2025: 265 · 2024: 143 · 2023: 35
FWCI
91.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
chronic pain, high-impact chronic pain, prevalence, adults, health disparities, American Indian and Alaska Native adults, bisexuals, marital status, socioeconomic status, pain management, National Health Interview Survey, health equity
MeSH terms
Adult, Health Status, Humans, Population Surveillance, United States, Prevalence, American Indian or Alaska Native, Chronic Pain, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review