Cited by 34Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchPain Management and Opioid UseComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies

A Case Series of Patients Using Medicinal Marihuana for Management of Chronic Pain Under the Canadian Marihuana Medical Access Regulations

Open access
Lynch, Mary E., Young, Judee, Clark, Alexander J.·2006·Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

Abstract

The Canadian Marihuana Medical Access Regulations (MMAR) program allows Health Canada to grant access to marihuana for medical use to those who are suffering from grave and debilitating illnesses. This is a report on a case series of 30 patients followed at a tertiary care pain management center in Nova Scotia who have used medicinal marihuana for 1-5 years under the MMAR program. Patients completed a follow-up questionnaire containing demographic and dosing information, a series of 11-point numerical symptom relief rating scales, a side effect checklist, and a subjective measure of improvement in function. Doses of marihuana ranged from less than 1 to 5g per day via the smoked or oral route of administration. Ninety-three percent of patients reported moderate or greater pain relief. Side effects were reported by 76% of patients, the most common of which were increased appetite and a sense of well-being, weight gain, and slowed thoughts. Limitations of the study include self-selection bias, small size, and lack of a control group. The need for further study using controlled trials is discussed along with an overview of the MMAR program.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.05.016

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the five studies on nausea in chronic pain, each involved whole plant cannabis in inhaled or oral formats, and patients reported moderate relief.

    “Each study involved whole plant cannabis in inhaled or oral formats, with patients reporting moderate relief.”

    From Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cannabis and Cannabinoid-Based Medicines in the Management of Chronic Pain and Co-Occurring Conditions (2024) · cites this paper as [91]

    The Results report smoked and oral use of medicinal marihuana, and 13 patients reported moderate-to-complete relief of nausea and vomiting. This case series supports that finding for its own patients, but it does not establish that all five studies used those formats or reported such relief. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Two other studies reported that the majority of participants reduced their routine pain medications by 60-70%; however, the extent to which opioid medications were specifically reduced was unclear.

    “Two other studies reported that the majority of participants reduced their routine pain medications by 60–70%; however, the extent to which opioid medications were specifically reduced was unclear.87,99”

    From Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cannabis and Cannabinoid-Based Medicines in the Management of Chronic Pain and Co-Occurring Conditions (2024) · cites this paper as [99]

    The Results report that 15 patients (70%) decreased use of other medications, including NSAIDs, opioids, and antidepressants. The 70% describes the proportion of patients, not a 60–70% reduction in medication use. The paper does not quantify reductions in opioids specifically. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Mack A, Joy J. Marihuana as medicine: the sci- ence beyond the controversy. National Academy Press, 2001. pp. 13e19.
  2. Walker JM, Strangman NM, Huang SM. Canna- binoids and pain. Pain Res Manag 2001;6(2):74e79.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lynch, M. E., Young, J., & Clark, A. J.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Lynch, Mary E.
Venue
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-11
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
497-501
ISSN
0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095422124
Cited by
34
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Keywords
medical cannabis, chronic pain, analgesia, cannabis side effects, symptom relief, functional improvement, long-term cannabis use, pain management
MeSH terms
Adult, Cannabis, Chronic Disease, Drug and Narcotic Control, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Phytotherapy, Middle Aged, Nova Scotia, Pain, Treatment Outcome, Plant Preparations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review