Cited by 150Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and TreatmentAnesthesia and Pain Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 109 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Alteration in Pain Modulation in Women With Persistent Pain After Lumpectomy: Influence of Catastrophizing

Open access

Abstract

Context Persistent pain is common after surgical treatment of breast cancer, but fairly little is known about the changes in sensory processing that accompany such pain syndromes.Objectives This study used quantitative sensory testing to compare psychophysical responses to standardized noxious stimulation in two groups of women who had previously undergone breast cancer surgery: women with (n=37) and without (n=34) persistent postoperative pain.Methods Participants underwent a single testing session in which responses to a variety of noxious stimuli were assessed.Results Findings suggested that women with chronic pain after breast cancer surgery display enhanced temporal summation of mechanical pain, deficits in endogenous pain inhibition, and more intense painful aftersensations compared with those without long-term pain. Some of these group differences were mediated by higher levels of pain catastrophizing in the group of women with persistent pain.Conclusion These findings suggest that persistent postoperative pain is associated with alterations in central nervous system pain-modulatory processes. Future treatment studies might benefit from targeting these pain-modulatory systems, and additional studies using functional neuroimaging methods might provide further valuable information about the pathophysiology of long-term postsurgical pain in women treated for breast cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.06.016

Cites

109 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 109 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–150 of 150

Metadata

Authors
Edwards, R. R., Mensing, G., Cahalan, C., Greenbaum, S., Narang, S., Belfer, I., Schreiber, K. L., Campbell, C., Wasan, A. D., & Jamison, R. N.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Edwards, Robert R.
Venue
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
30-42
ISSN
0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100867581
Cited by
150
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8
FWCI
6.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R21 CA120500)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Pain Management
Keywords
chronic postoperative pain, breast cancer surgery, breast-conserving surgery, pain catastrophizing, pain modulation, temporal summation, endogenous pain inhibition, mechanical pain, central sensitization, women
MeSH terms
Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Postoperative Pain, Mastectomy, Segmental, Pain Threshold, Catastrophization, Pain Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review