Cited by 102Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmaceutical studies and practicesPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Long-term atomoxetine treatment in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Wilens, Timothy E., Newcorn, Jeffrey H., Kratochvil, Christopher J., Gao, Haitao, Thomason, Christine K., Rogers, Ann K., Feldman, Peter D., Levine, Louise R.·2006·The Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

Objective To determine the efficacy and safety of atomoxetine in adolescent subjects treated for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) for up to 2 years.Study design Data from 13 atomoxetine studies (6 double-blind, 7 open-label) were pooled for subjects age 12 to 18 with ADHD as defined by the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV.Results Of the 601 atomoxetine-treated subjects in this meta-analysis, 537 (89.4%) completed 3 months of acute treatment. A total of 259 subjects (48.4%) are continuing atomoxetine treatment; 219 of these subjects have completed at least 2 years of treatment. The mean dose of atomoxetine at endpoint was 1.41 mg/kg/day. Mean ADHD Rating Scale IV, parent version, investigator-administered and -scored total scores showed significant improvement (P < .001) over the first 3 months. Symptoms remained improved up to 24 months without dosage escalation. During the 2-year treatment period, 99 (16.5%) subjects discontinued treatment due to lack of effectiveness, and 31 (5.2%) subjects discontinued treatment due to adverse events. No clinically significant abnormalities in height, weight, blood pressure, pulse, mean laboratory values, or electrocardiography parameters were found.Conclusions Two-year data from this ongoing study indicate that atomoxetine maintains efficacy among adolescents with ADHD, with no evidence of drug tolerance and no new or unexpected safety concerns.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.01.052

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilens, T. E., Newcorn, J. H., Kratochvil, C. J., Gao, H., Thomason, C. K., Rogers, A. K., Feldman, P. D., & Levine, L. R.
Affiliations
Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Wilens, Timothy E.
Venue
The Journal of Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-07
Volume
149
Issue
1
Pages
112-119
ISSN
0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050880665
Cited by
102
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
atomoxetine, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, adolescents, long-term treatment, treatment efficacy, drug safety, drug tolerance, ADHD Rating Scale-IV, adverse events, dose escalation
MeSH terms
Atomoxetine Hydrochloride, Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Clinical Trials as Topic, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Male, Propylamines, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Treatment Outcome, Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors, Databases as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review