Cited by 8Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmaceutical studies and practicesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Atomoxetine in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder with prior stimulant therapy: a prospective open-label study

Hammerness, Paul, Doyle, Robert, Kotarski, Meghan, Georgiopoulos, Anna, Joshi, Gagan, Zeitlin, Sarah, Biederman, Joseph·2009·European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

The objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of atomoxetine in youth, ages 6-17 years with ADHD, who had a prior trial of stimulant treatment. This was a 6-week prospective open-label study of atomoxetine, dosage up to 1.4 mg/kg per day in 34 children and adolescents with DSM-IV ADHD. Primary measures of response included the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD RS) and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale. Analyses were intention-to-treat. The treatment with atomoxetine was associated with statistical and clinical significant reduction in clinician rated ADHD RS symptoms, compared with baseline. Statistical significant improvement was attained by the second week of treatment. Fifty-six percent (N = 18) met criteria for our a priori definition of response; much or very much improved on the CGI plus more than 30% reduction in ADHD RS symptoms. In conclusion, atomoxetine was generally well tolerated; 85% of subjects completed the trial. Atomoxetine was effective and well tolerated in a 6-week open study of ADHD youth with a prior history of stimulant treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00787-009-0017-8

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Atomoxetine efficacy has been confirmed in populations around the world, including for children with oppositional defiant disorder or those who have received previous stimulant therapy.

    “studies in populations around the world have continued to confirm its efficacy [78-81], including for children with oppositional defiant disorder [82] or those who have received previous stimulant therapy [83].”

    From Advances in understanding and treating ADHD (2011) · cites this paper as [83]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hammerness, P., Doyle, R., Kotarski, M., Georgiopoulos, A., Joshi, G., Zeitlin, S., & Biederman, J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Hammerness, Paul
Venue
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Published
2009-04-18
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
493-498
ISSN
  • 1018-8827 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-165X
OpenAlex
W2033673747
Cited by
8
References
14
Citations by year
2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
atomoxetine, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, children and adolescents, treatment response, tolerability, ADHD Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impression Scale, non-stimulant medication
MeSH terms
Atomoxetine Hydrochloride, Adolescent, Analysis of Variance, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Male, Propylamines, Prospective Studies, Chi-Square Distribution, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Patient Selection, Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Intention to Treat Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review