Cited by 23Neonatal and fetal brain pathologyNeonatal Health and BiochemistryInfant Development and Preterm Care

Cot-side electroencephalography monitoring is not clinically useful in the detection of mild neonatal hypoglycemia

Harris, Deborah L., Weston, Philip J., Williams, Christopher E., Pleasants, Anthony B., Battin, Malcolm R., Spooner, Claire G., Harding, Jane E.·2011·The Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

Objectives To determine whether there is a relationship between electroencephalography patterns and hypoglycemia, by using simultaneous cot-side amplitude integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) and continuous interstitial glucose monitoring, and whether non-glucose cerebral fuels modified these patterns.Study design Eligible babies were ≥ 32 weeks gestation, at risk for hypoglycemia, and admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. Electrodes were placed in C3-P3, C4-P4 O1-O2 montages. A continuous interstitial glucose sensor was placed subcutaneously, and blood glucose was measured by using the glucose oxidase method. Non-glucose cerebral fuels were measured at study entry, exit, and during recognized hypoglycemia.Results A total of 101 babies were enrolled, with a median weight of 2179 g and gestation of 35 weeks. Twenty-four of the babies had aEEG recordings, and glucose concentrations were low (< 2.6 mM). There were 103 episodes of low glucose concentrations lasting 5 to 475 minutes, but no observable changes in aEEG variables. Plasma concentrations of lactate, beta-hydroxybutyrate, and glycerol were low and did not alter during hypoglycemia.Conclusions Cot-side aEEG was not useful for the detection of neurological changes during mild hypoglycemia. Plasma concentrations of non-glucose cerebral fuels were low and unlikely to provide substantial neuroprotection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.04.026

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harris, D. L., Weston, P. J., Williams, C. E., Pleasants, A. B., Battin, M. R., Spooner, C. G., & Harding, J. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Waikato District Health Board (NZ)
  • Starship Children's Health (NZ)
Corresponding author
Harding, Jane E.
Venue
The Journal of Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
159
Issue
5
Pages
755-760.e1
ISSN
0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044695892
Cited by
23
References
39
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal Health and Biochemistry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
neonatal hypoglycemia, amplitude-integrated electroencephalography, lactate, beta-hydroxybutyrate, glycerol, neuroprotection, hypoglycemia detection
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Electroencephalography, Glucose Oxidase, Glycerol, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Infant, Newborn, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Male, Monitoring, Physiologic, Point-of-Care Systems, Lactic Acid, 3-Hydroxybutyric Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review