Cited by 59Health Policy Implementation ScienceGenomics and Rare DiseasesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Implementing Rapid Whole-Genome Sequencing in Critical Care: A Qualitative Study of Facilitators and Barriers to New Technology Adoption

Open access
Franck, Linda S., Kriz, Rebecca M., Rego, Seema, Garman, Karen, Hobbs, Charlotte, Dimmock, David·2021·The Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the views of members of the multi-disciplinary team regarding the implementation of rapid whole-genome sequencing (rWGS) as a first-tier test for critically ill children in diverse children's hospital settings. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative interviews informed by implementation science theory were conducted with the multidisciplinary patient care teams and hospital leaders at each of the 5 tertiary care children's hospitals involved in a statewide rWGS implementation project. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed 5 key themes regarding the implementation process across the sites: the need for rWGS champions, educational needs and strategies, negotiating decision-making roles and processes, workflows and workarounds, and perceptions about rWGS. From the findings a composite clinical workflow diagram was developed to summarize all of the processes involved in the implementation of the test, and the key areas where implementation practices differed. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide insights for design of interventions to support adoption, scale-up, and sustainability of rWGS and other novel technologies in neonatal and pediatric critical care settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.05.045

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Franck, L. S., Kriz, R. M., Rego, S., Garman, K., Hobbs, C., & Dimmock, D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Rady Children's Institute for Genomic Medicine (US)
  • Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Franck, Linda S.
Venue
The Journal of Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
237
Pages
237-243.e2
ISSN
0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3164028362
Cited by
59
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6
FWCI
11.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
rapid whole genome sequencing, intensive care, pediatric intensive care, neonatal intensive care, technology adoption, implementation barriers and facilitators, multidisciplinary team, clinical workflow, children's hospitals, implementation champions
MeSH terms
Child, Critical Care, Hospitals, Pediatric, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Technology, Rare Diseases, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review