Cited by 197Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismAction Observation and SynchronizationCategorization, perception, and language

fMRI evidence for word association and situated simulation in conceptual processing

Simmons, W. Kyle, Hamann, Stephan B., Harenski, Carla L., Hu, Xiaoping P., Barsalou, Lawrence W.·2008·Journal of Physiology-Paris

Abstract

The LASS theory proposes that Language and Situated Simulation both play central roles in conceptual processing. Depending on stimuli and task conditions, different mixtures of language and simulation occur. When a word is processed in a conceptual task, it first activates other linguistic forms, such as word associates. More slowly, the word activates a situated simulation to represent its meaning in neural systems for perception, action, and mental states. An fMRI experiment tested the LASS account. In a first scanning session, participants performed the property generation task to provide a measure of conceptual processing. In a second scanning session a week later, participants performed two localizer tasks measuring word association and situated simulation. Conjunction analyses supported predictions of the LASS theory. Activations early in conceptual processing overlapped with activations for word association. Activations late in conceptual processing overlapped with activations for situation generation. These results, along with others in the literature, indicate that conceptual processing uses multiple representations, not one. Furthermore, researchers must be careful drawing conclusions about conceptual processing, given that different paradigms are likely to produce different mixtures of language and simulation. Whereas some paradigms produce high levels of linguistic processing and low levels of simulation, other paradigms produce the opposite pattern.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.014

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because words are partly represented through situated simulations of prior experiences, emotion words are expected to work together with conceptualization when perceivers make meaning of core affective states.

    “Because words are in part represented via situated simulations of prior experiences (e.g., Simmons et al. 2008), we expect emotion words to work together with conceptualization when perceivers make meaning of core affective states.”

    From The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review (2012) · cites this paper as Simmons et al. 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simmons, W. K., Hamann, S. B., Harenski, C. L., Hu, X. P., & Barsalou, L. W.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Barsalou, Lawrence W.
Venue
Journal of Physiology-Paris
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
102
Issue
1-3
Pages
106-119
ISSN
0928-4257 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158227188
Cited by
197
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 21
FWCI
6.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Physiology-Paris (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (5f31mh070152-02)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (1F31MH070152-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
Keywords
word association, conceptual processing, multiple representations, conjunction analysis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Association, Brain, Concept Formation, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Linguistics, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen, Reaction Time, Vocabulary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review