Cited by 366Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchAdvancements in Battery MaterialsControl Systems and Identification

Rapid test and non-linear model characterisation of solid-state lithium-ion batteries

Abu-Sharkh, Suleiman, Doerffel, Dennis·2004·Journal of Power Sources

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.12.001

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abu-Sharkh, S., & Doerffel, D.
Affiliations
University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Doerffel, Dennis
Venue
Journal of Power Sources
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
130
Issue
1-2
Pages
266-274
ISSN
0378-7753 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001484805
Cited by
366
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 24
FWCI
8.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Power Sources (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
Keywords
solid-state lithium-ion batteries, electrochemical impedance, battery degradation, battery performance prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review