The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cost-minimized combinations of wind power, solar power and electrochemical storage, powering the grid up to 99.9% of the time
Open accessAbstract
We model many combinations of renewable electricity sources (inland wind, offshore wind, and photovoltaics) with electrochemical storage (batteries and fuel cells), incorporated into a large grid system (72 GW). The purpose is twofold: 1) although a single renewable generator at one site produces intermittent power, we seek combinations of diverse renewables at diverse sites, with storage, that are not intermittent and satisfy need a given fraction of hours. And 2) we seek minimal cost, calculating true cost of electricity without subsidies and with inclusion of external costs. Our model evaluated over 28 billion combinations of renewables and storage, each tested over 35,040 h (four years) of load and weather data. We find that the least cost solutions yield seemingly-excessive generation capacity—at times, almost three times the electricity needed to meet electrical load. This is because diverse renewable generation and the excess capacity together meet electric load with less storage, lowering total system cost. At 2030 technology costs and with excess electricity displacing natural gas, we find that the electric system can be powered 90%–99.9% of hours entirely on renewable electricity, at costs comparable to today's—but only if we optimize the mix of generation and storage technologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Progress in electrical energy storage system: a critical review
Chen, H., Cong, T. N., Yang, W., Tan, C., Li, Y., & Ding, Y. (2009) · Progress in Natural Science · doi:10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.07.014 · Cited by 3,746
Kempton, W., & Tomić, J. (2005) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.12.022 · Cited by 2,126
Self-citation
Cited by
Brown, T., Schlachtberger, D., Kies, A., Schramm, S., & Greiner, M. (2018) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.222 · Cited by 836
Wu, G., Santandreu, A., Kellogg, W., Gupta, S., Ogoke, O., Zhang, H., Wang, H.-L., & Dai, L. (2016) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.12.032 · Cited by 744
A review at the role of storage in energy systems with a focus on Power to Gas and long-term storage
Blanco, H., & Faaij, A. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.062 · Cited by 710
Status and perspectives on 100% renewable energy systems
Hansen, K., Breyer, C., & Lund, H. (2019) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.092 · Cited by 681
Role of Long-Duration Energy Storage in Variable Renewable Electricity Systems
Dowling, J. A., Rinaldi, K. Z., Ruggles, T. H., Davis, S. J., Yuan, M., Tong, F., Lewis, N. S., & Caldeira, K. (2020) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2020.07.007 · Cited by 656
Metadata
- Authors
- Budischak, C., Sewell, D., Thomson, H., Mach, L., Veron, D. E., & Kempton, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Power Sources
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 225
- Pages
- 60-74
- ISSN
- 0378-7753 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2149687025
- Cited by
- 536
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 25.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cost-minimized combinations of wind power, solar power and electrochemical storage, powering the grid up to 99.9% of the time. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.054
- The paper
- Budischak, C., Sewell, D., Thomson, H., Mach, L., Veron, D. E., & Kempton, W. (2013). Cost-minimized combinations of wind power, solar power and electrochemical storage, powering the grid up to 99.9% of the time. Journal of Power Sources. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.054
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.