Cited by 33Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

Development of an MRM assay panel with application to biobank samples from patients with myocardial infarction

Rezeli, Melinda, Végvári, Ákos, Donnarumma, Fabrizio, Gidlöf, Olof, Smith, J. Gustav, Erlinge, David, Marko-Varga, György·2013·Journal of Proteomics

Abstract

As part of a Swedish national cardiological research initiative, the development of a quantitative MRM assay is reported for the quantification of eleven putative cardiovascular disease markers. Within the study, patient samples from the LUNDHEARTGENE biobank were processed and nanoLC-MS/MS analysis was performed together with a stable isotope dilution strategy for absolute quantification of the target proteins. Excellent linear regressions were achieved for 9 of the 11 peptides with LOQ ranged in the attomolar range. We have utilized the assay for the screening of plasma samples from patients with chest pain, and performed a comparative analysis of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and chest pain due to other causes. The assay demonstrates high reproducibility and correlate with clinical findings. Strong correlations were found for several of the apolipoproteins and their respective lipid subfractions (LDL, HDL or triglycerides). APOC1, APOC2 and APOE were elevated in patients with STEMI. Biological significance An MRM assay were developed for putative cardiovascular disease markers as target proteins, and applied to biobanking sample material. The comparative analysis of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and chest pain due to other causes showed elevated levels of APOC1, APOC2 and APOE in patients with STEMI. These observations raise interesting novel hypotheses about the role of apolipoproteins C1, C2 and E in the pathophysiolo…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.05.016

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rezeli, M., Végvári, Á., Donnarumma, F., Gidlöf, O., Smith, J. G., Erlinge, D., & Marko-Varga, G.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Rezeli, Melinda
Venue
Journal of Proteomics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
87
Pages
16-25
ISSN
1874-3919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990839024
Cited by
33
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Proteomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research, “TOTAL-AMI”, Swedish Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Swedish Research Council, Vinnova, Ingabritt & Arne Lundbergs forskningsstiftelse
  • Crafoord Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Keywords
cardiovascular biomarkers, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, APOC1, apolipoprotein C2, apolipoprotein E, apolipoproteins, chest pain, biobank samples, absolute quantification
MeSH terms
Apolipoproteins, Female, Humans, Male, Myocardial Infarction, Mass Spectrometry, Reproducibility of Results, Biological Specimen Banks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review