Cited by 76Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Phenomenology of OCD: Lessons from a large multicenter study and implications for ICD-11

Open access
Shavitt, Roseli G., de Mathis, Maria Alice, Oki, Fábio, Ferrao, Ygor A., Fontenelle, Leonardo F., Torres, Albina R., Diniz, Juliana B., Costa, Daniel L.C. +4 more·2014·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the phenomenology of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), addressing specific questions about the nature of obsessions and compulsions, and to contribute to the World Health Organization's (WHO) revision of OCD diagnostic guidelines. Data from 1001 patients from the Brazilian Research Consortium on Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders were used. Patients were evaluated by trained clinicians using validated instruments, including the Dimensional Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale, the University of Sao Paulo Sensory Phenomena Scale, and the Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale. The aims were to compare the types of sensory phenomena (SP, subjective experiences that precede or accompany compulsions) in OCD patients with and without tic disorders and to determine the frequency of mental compulsions, the co-occurrence of obsessions and compulsions, and the range of insight. SP were common in the whole sample, but patients with tic disorders were more likely to have physical sensations and urges only. Mental compulsions occurred in the majority of OCD patients. It was extremely rare for OCD patients to have obsessions without compulsions. A wide range of insight into OCD beliefs was observed, with a small subset presenting no insight. The data generated from this large sample will help practicing clinicians appreciate the full range of OCD symptoms and confirm prior studies in smaller samples the degree to which insight varies. These findings also support specific revisions to the WHO's diagnostic guidelines for OCD, such as describing sensory phenomena, mental compulsions and level of insight, so that the world-wide recognition of this disabling disorder is increased.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.06.010

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A significant proportion of OCD patients, 60-70%, experience sensory phenomena consisting of aversive or uncomfortable sensations or perceptions that drive repetitive behaviors.

    “a significant proportion of patients (60–70%) also experience sensory phenomena (SP) consisting of aversive or uncomfortable sensations or perceptions that drive repetitive behaviors (Table 2) [73–76].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Patient Edition (SCID-I/P). New York: Biometrics Research: New York State Psychiatric Institute; 2002.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shavitt, R. G., de Mathis, M. A., Oki, F., Ferrao, Y. A., Fontenelle, L. F., Torres, A. R., Diniz, J. B., Costa, D. L. C., do Rosário, M. C., Hoexter, M. Q., Miguel, E. C., & Simpson, H. B.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Shavitt, Roseli G.
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
57
Pages
141-148
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138706516
Cited by
76
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Acervo Digital da Universidade Estadual Paulista (Universidade Estadual Paulista) (submittedVersion)
  • UNESP Institutional Repository (São Paulo State University) (submittedVersion)
  • UNIFESP Institutional Repository (Universidade Federal de São Paulo) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K24MH091555, K24MH09155)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, phenomenology, sensory phenomena, obsession, compulsive behavior, insight, tic disorders, ICD-11, diagnostic criteria, compulsive checking, compulsive washing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Brazil, Child, Compulsive Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obsessive Behavior, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Personality Assessment, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review