Cited by 26Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentCircadian rhythm and melatoninTreatment of Major Depression

Daytime light exposure in daily life and depressive symptoms in bipolar disorder: A cross-sectional analysis in the APPLE cohort

Esaki, Yuichi, Kitajima, Tsuyoshi, Obayashi, Kenji, Saeki, Keigo, Fujita, Kiyoshi, Iwata, Nakao·2019·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Objectives Controlled artificial daylight exposure, such as light therapy, is effective in bipolar depression, but the association between uncontrolled daytime light and depressive symptoms in bipolar disorder (BD) is unclear. This study investigated the association between daytime light exposure under real-life situations and depressive symptom in patients with BD. Methods This cross-sectional study enrolled 181 outpatients with BD. The average daytime light intensity and the total duration of light intensity of ≥1000 lux were recorded over 7 consecutive days using an actigraph that measured ambient light. Depressive symptoms were assessed using Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, and scores of ≥8 points were treated as depressed state. Results Ninety-seven (53.6%) subjects were depressed state. At higher average daytime light intensity tertiles, the proportion of depressed state was significantly lower (P for trend, 0.003). In multivariable analysis adjusted for age, employment status, age at onset of BD, Young Mania Rating Scale score, bedtime, and physical activity, the highest tertile group in average daytime light intensity suggested a significantly lower odds ratio (OR) for depressed state than the lowest tertile group (OR, 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.75; P = 0.009). Similarly, the longest tertile group in light intensity ≥1000 lux duration was significantly associated with lower OR for depressed state than lowest tertile group (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18-0.93; P = 0.033). Conclusions The findings suggest that greater daytime light exposure in daily life is associated with decreased depressive symptoms in BD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.06.010

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Esaki, Y., Kitajima, T., Obayashi, K., Saeki, K., Fujita, K., & Iwata, N.
Affiliations
  • Fujita Health University (JP)
  • Nara Medical University (JP)
Corresponding author
Esaki, Yuichi
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
116
Pages
151-156
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2950271331
Cited by
26
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (18K15529)
  • Japan Foundation for Neuroscience and Mental Health
  • The Neuroscience Research Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
bipolar disorder, depressive symptoms, ambient light intensity, phototherapy, actigraphy, natural light exposure
MeSH terms
Adult, Bipolar Disorder, Circadian Rhythm, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Photoperiod, Actigraphy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review