Cited by 182Circadian rhythm and melatoninLaser Applications in Dentistry and MedicineDigital Mental Health Interventions

Adjunctive Bright Light Therapy for Bipolar Depression: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial

Open access
Sit, Dorothy K., McGowan, James, Wiltrout, Christopher, Diler, Rasim Somer, Dills, John (Jesse), Luther, James, Yang, Amy, Ciolino, Jody D. +4 more·2018·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective Patients with bipolar disorder have recurrent major depression, residual mood symptoms, and limited treatment options. Building on promising pilot data, the authors conducted a 6-week randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of adjunctive bright light therapy at midday for bipolar depression. The aims were to determine remission rate, depression symptom level, and rate of mood polarity switch, as well as to explore sleep quality. Method The study enrolled depressed adults with bipolar I or II disorder who were receiving stable dosages of antimanic medication (excluding patients with hypomania or mania, mixed symptoms, or rapid cycling). Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with either 7,000-lux bright white light or 50-lux dim red placebo light (N=23 for each group). Symptoms were assessed weekly with the Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Scale With Atypical Depression Supplement (SIGH-ADS), the Mania Rating Scale, and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Remission was defined as having a SIGH-ADS score of 8 or less. Results At baseline, both groups had moderate depression and no hypomanic or manic symptoms. Compared with the placebo light group, the group treated with bright white light experienced a significantly higher remission rate (68.2% compared with 22.2%; adjusted odds ratio=12.6) at weeks 4-6 and significantly lower depression scores (9.2 [SD=6.6] compared with 14.9 [SD=9.2]; adjusted β=-5.91)…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16101200

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

3 of 35 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Dim red light produced negligible effects on circadian rhythms.

    “and produced negligible effects on circadian rhythms (16).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that longer-wavelength light is less effective than 460 nm light at suppressing melatonin, which is consistent with a weaker response to red light. But the study measured melatonin suppression, not the effect of dim red light on circadian rhythms; the Discussion says the connection between those outcomes needs further testing. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    Compared with placebo light, bright white light produced a significantly higher remission rate (68.2% vs 22.2%; adjusted odds ratio=12.6) at weeks 4-6.

    “Compared with the placebo light group, the group treated with bright white light experienced a significantly higher remission rate (68.2% compared with 22.2%; adjusted odds ratio=12.6)at weeks 4-6”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Patients who were still actively enrolled at weeks 4-6 had fully (or nearly) completed the dose-titration protocol, and those who withdrew early also provided informative outcome data.
  • Findingown data

    Bright white light produced significantly lower depression scores (9.2 [SD=6.6] vs 14.9 [SD=9.2]; adjusted b=-5.91) at the endpoint visit.

    “significantly lower depression scores (9.2 [SD=6.6]compared with 14.9 [SD=9.2];adjusted b=-5.91) at the endpoint visit.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Patients who were still actively enrolled at weeks 4-6 had fully (or nearly) completed the dose-titration protocol, and those who withdrew early also provided informative outcome data.
  • Findingown data

    At baseline, both groups had moderate depression (mean SIGH-ADS scores 24.22 and 27.70 for active and inactive treatment, respectively).

    “At baseline, both groups had moderate depression and no hypomanic or manic symptoms.”
    • Also stated in: § Clinical Measures at Randomization · plain
      “at baseline patients assigned to active treatment and inactive treatment had moderate depression levels (mean SIGH-ADS scores, 24.22 and 27.70, respectively”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    At baseline, both groups had no hypomanic or manic symptoms.

    “At baseline, both groups had moderate depression and no hypomanic or manic symptoms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 33
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 33
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Antidepressant monotherapy can induce hypomania and rapid cycling.

    “Antidepressant monotherapy can induce hypomania and rapid cycling (3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] source

      The Clinical and research implications section reports switches into hypomania or mania during antidepressant treatment, particularly with venlafaxine. But the Method section says the antidepressants were added to mood stabilisers, not used as monotherapy, and the Rapid cycling section treats rapid cycling as an existing patient status rather than an outcome induced by treatment. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In seasonal affective disorder and nonseasonal depression, the response to morning light therapy is typically attributed to phase-resetting effects.

    “In seasonal affective disorder (27,28) and nonseasonal depression (29), the response to morning light therapy is typically attributed to the phase-resetting effects (28).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [27] source
    • cites [28] source

      The paper’s opening discussion (page unavailable) says that morning light could relieve SAD through a corrective circadian phase advance, supporting the phase-resetting explanation for winter depression. Its Conclusions mention nonseasonal depression only as a subject for future study; our copy does not establish that explanation for nonseasonal depression. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [29] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The active treatment group had lower clinical severity than the inactive treatment group, but the difference was not significant.

    “The active treatment group also experienced a higher response rate, lower clinical severity, less anxiety, fewer social problems, fewer neurovegetative symptoms, and better sleep quality compared with the inactive treatment group, but the differences were not significant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Forty-five patients attended one or more postbaseline visits (median=6 visits), and 40 patients (87%) completed the study.

    “Forty-five patients attended one or more postbaseline visits (median=6 visits), and 40 patients (87%) completed the study (Table 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The active treatment group had better sleep quality than the inactive treatment group, but the difference was not significant.

    “The active treatment group also experienced a higher response rate, lower clinical severity, less anxiety, fewer social problems, fewer neurovegetative symptoms, and better sleep quality compared with the inactive treatment group, but the differences were not significant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Sleep quality improved in both groups and did not differ significantly between them.

    “Sleep quality improved in both groups and did not differ significantly between them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The active treatment group had fewer neurovegetative symptoms than the inactive treatment group, but the difference was not significant.

    “The active treatment group also experienced a higher response rate, lower clinical severity, less anxiety, fewer social problems, fewer neurovegetative symptoms, and better sleep quality compared with the inactive treatment group, but the differences were not significant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The active treatment group had a higher response rate than the inactive treatment group, but the difference was not significant.

    “The active treatment group also experienced a higher response rate, lower clinical severity, less anxiety, fewer social problems, fewer neurovegetative symptoms, and better sleep quality compared with the inactive treatment group, but the differences were not significant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    One patient enrolled during pregnancy; analyses with and without her indicated no differences in outcomes.

    “One patient enrolled during pregnancy; the analyses with and without her indicated no differences in outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The frequency of suicidal thoughts (23.9% for the sample) did not differ significantly between groups.

    “The frequency of suicidal thoughts (23.9% for the sample) did not differ significantly between groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The active treatment group had fewer social problems than the inactive treatment group, but the difference was not significant.

    “The active treatment group also experienced a higher response rate, lower clinical severity, less anxiety, fewer social problems, fewer neurovegetative symptoms, and better sleep quality compared with the inactive treatment group, but the differences were not significant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The active treatment group had less anxiety than the inactive treatment group, but the difference was not significant.

    “The active treatment group also experienced a higher response rate, lower clinical severity, less anxiety, fewer social problems, fewer neurovegetative symptoms, and better sleep quality compared with the inactive treatment group, but the differences were not significant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The median number of postbaseline visits differed significantly between groups (median=6 [IQR=6-6] active vs median=6 [IQR=5-6] inactive; U=185, p=0.003).

    “Although the median number of postbaseline visits (median=6 [interquartile range=6-6] for the active treatment group, compared with median=6 [interquartile range=5-6] for the inactive treatment group; U=185, p=0.003) differed significantly between groups”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Patients in both conditions experienced infrequent side effect worsening and, rarely, thoughts of suicide.

    “Patients in both conditions experienced infrequent side effect worsening and, rarely, thoughts of suicide (see Tables 3 and 4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The secondary longitudinal analyses were not significant.

    “The secondary longitudinal analyses were not significant (not reported here).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The secondary longitudinal analyses assumed fixed effects of intervention group, study week, and group-by-week interaction, and a random patient effect.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The odds ratio for remission with active versus inactive treatment was 7.50 (95% CI=1.80, 31.28, p=0.003); adjusted odds ratio=12.64 (95% CI=2.16, 74.08, p=0.004).

    “odds ratio=7.50,95% CI=1.80, 31.28,p=0.003; adjusted odds ratio=12.64,95% CI=2.16, 74.08, p=0.004”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Expectations at endpoint were not significantly different between groups.

    “Expectations at endpoint were not significantly different between groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to active bright white or inactive dim red light and stratified by antidepressant use with a block design (six patients per block).

    “Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to active bright white or inactive dim red light and stratified by antidepressant use with a block design (six patients per block).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Light therapy presents no additional risk, and nonpharmacological treatments are limited.

    “We included pregnant women because light therapy presents no additional risk and nonpharmacological treatments are limited (15).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The study proposed to enroll two groups of 30 patients for 80% power to detect group differences in mean SIGH-ADS score of 2.6 points with a moderate effect size (0.37) and remission rates of 33%-38% (OR 6.9 at alpha 0.05).

    “We proposed to enroll two groups of 30 patients for an 80% power to detect group differences in the mean SIGH-ADS score of 2.6 points with a moderate effect size (0.37) and remission rates of 33%238% (for an odds ratio of 6.9 at an alpha of 0.05”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premiseown data

    In the authors' pilot, five additional patients were enrolled; three had a full response, and one who had an initial partial response responded fully after transitioning to morning light.

    “We enrolled five additional patients; three had a full response, and one who had an initial partial response responded fully after transitioning to morning light.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Personnel conducting visits and clinical ratings were blind to treatment condition to avoid allegiance effects and worked separately from nonblinded personnel who dispensed light boxes.

    “Personnel conducting the visits and performing the clinical ratings were blind to the treatment condition to avoid allegiance effects, and they worked separately from the nonblinded personnel, who dispensed the study light boxes”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In a prior pilot, morning light therapy induced full response in one of four patients and hypomania in the other three.

    “Morning light therapy induced full response in one of four patients and, unexpectedly, hypomania in the other three patients (5).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Patients agreed not to search for information on light box design.

    “Patients agreed not to search for information on light box design.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The same dosing protocol was implemented for both groups.

    “We implemented the same dosing protocol for both groups (25).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Adjusted analyses accounted for potential confounding effects of age, time of enrollment (season), and baseline SIGH-ADS and GAF scores.

    “The adjusted analyses accounted for the potential confounding effects of age, time of enrollment (season), and baseline SIGH-ADS and GAF scores.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Response to light therapy is associated with sleep quality and circadian and seasonality traits.

    “Response to light therapy is associated with sleep quality and circadian and seasonality traits, which we assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (23), the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (24), and the Personal Inventory for Depression and Seasonal Affective Disorder (10), respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [23] source
    • cites [24] Horne JA, 1976, Int J Chronobiol

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [10] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    At midday, bright light exposure can phase-advance and increase the amplitude of nocturnal melatonin production in healthy subjects and in elderly patients with insomnia.

    “At midday, bright light exposure can phase-advance and increase the amplitude of nocturnal melatonin production in healthy subjects (12) and in elderly patients with insomnia (13).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [12] source
    • cites [13] Mishima K, 2001, J Clin Endocrinol Metab source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Depressed bipolar patients frequently have delayed sleep phase and atypical features (hypersomnia, hyperphagia, and lethargy), which are predictors of light therapy response.

    “Depressed bipolar patients frequently have delayed sleep phase and atypical features (hypersomnia, hyperphagia, and lethargy), which are predictors of light therapy response (4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    A modified intent-to-treat approach was used whereby all participants were analyzed according to the group to which they were randomized.

    “We used a modified intent-to-treat approach whereby all participants were analyzed according to the group to which they were randomized.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Patients with bipolar disorder often have recurrent major depression and residual mood symptoms.

    “Patients with bipolar disorder often have recurrent major depression and residual mood symptoms (1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Because of the sample size and numbers per group, no adjustments were made for multiple hypothesis tests.

    “Because of the sample size and numbers per group, we did not make adjustments for multiple hypothesis tests.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The study design elements were incorporated to mitigate unbalanced treatment expectations; therefore, the observed treatment response was expected to be related to the active light condition rather than to nonspecific effects.

    “The study design elements were incorporated to mitigate unbalanced treatment expectations; therefore, we expected the observed treatment response to be related to the active light condition rather than to nonspecific effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Treatment condition was disclosed to patients only at the final visit and to blinded personnel and statisticians only after analyses were completed.

    “We disclosed the treatment condition to patients only at the final visit and to blinded personnel and statisticians only after the analyses were completed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Expectations can moderate outcomes, especially in clinical trials involving light therapy, which test a visible intervention.

    “Expectations can moderate outcomes, especially in clinical trials involving light therapy, which test a visible intervention (10).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The active and placebo light boxes appeared identical when not illuminated.

    “The active and placebolightboxes appeared identical when not illuminated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Enrollment was stopped at 23 participants per group because funding had ended.

    “We stopped enrollment at 23 participants per group because funding had ended.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Sleep parameters (decreased awake time at night, increased sleep efficiency, and reduced wake time after sleep onset) have been found to be improved with midday light therapy.

    “Sleep parameters (decreased awake time at night, increased sleep efficiency, and reduced wake time after sleep onset) have also been found to be improved with midday light therapy (13).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] Mishima K, 2001, J Clin Endocrinol Metab source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Because both groups had moderate levels of depression and impaired functioning, categorically, and no other demographic or clinical differences, we judged the groups to be comparable at baseline.

    “Because both groups had moderate levels of depression and impaired functioning, categorically, and no other demographic or clinical differences, we judged the groups to be comparable at baseline.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Most other light studies have implemented full-dose, nontitration protocols and similarly detected remission after 5 weeks for antepartum depression and after 4, 6, and 8 weeks for nonseasonal depression.

    “Most other light studies have implemented full-dose, nontitration protocols and similarly detected remission after 5 weeks for antepartum depression (15) and after 4, 6, and 8 weeks for nonseasonal depression (29).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [15] source
    • cites [29] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    We did not explore the responses in patients with or without seasonal affective disorder because subanalyses would be underpowered and would provide inconclusive results.

    “We did not explore the responses in patients with or without seasonal affective disorder because subanalyses would be underpowered and would provide inconclusive results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Block randomization should mitigate the need for seasonality adjustment.

    “Block randomization should mitigate the need for seasonality adjustment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    We adjusted for time of enrollment.

    “Even so, we adjusted for time of enrollment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The sample size and the final numbers per group may have constrained our capacity to detect treatment effects and contributed to the wide confidence limits in some outcome measures.

    “Even so, the sample size and the final numbers per group may have constrained our capacity to detect treatment effects and contributed to the wide confidence limits in some outcome measures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The number of participants enrolled in February and March was unbalanced despite randomization, which would bias against the active intervention.

    “Given that the number of participants enrolled in February and March was unbalanced despite randomization, this actually would bias against the active intervention.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Both groups titrated to the same maximum light dose and the same actual light dose at endpoint.

    “Both groups titrated to the same maximum light dose and the same actual light dose at endpoint”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    By examining selected outcomes within the period of weeks 4-6, we were able to consider the patients who completed the dosing protocol and likely received the appropriate exposure to light therapy.

    “By examining selected outcomes within the period of weeks 4-6, we were able to consider the patients who completed the dosing protocol and likely received the appropriate exposure to light therapy”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    We were unable to consider the patients who withdrew before week 4, many of whom were in the placebo comparator group.

    “however, we were unable to consider the patients who withdrew before then, many of whom were in the placebo comparator group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Given that participants had a SCID-confirmed current major depressive episode (minimum duration of 2 weeks), it is possible that the patients who enrolled in the fall and winter experienced the onset of depression weeks or months earlier and did not have a purely seasonal or winter depression.

    “Given that participants had a SCID-confirmed current major depressive episode (minimum duration of 2 weeks), it is possible that the patients who enrolled in the fall and winter experienced the onset of depression weeks or months earlier and did not have a purely seasonal or winter depression.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The novel use of a dose-titration protocol, implementation of bright light therapy at midday, and the requirement for concurrent antimanic treatment mitigated the risks for emergent mania or hypomania.

    “The novel use of a dose-titration protocol, implementation of bright light therapy at midday, and the requirement for concurrent antimanic treatment mitigated the risks for emergent mania or hypomania.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    By randomly assigning patients to active or placebo light therapy, the degree of seasonality distributed equally to both treatment groups, as expected.

    “By randomly assigning patients to active or placebo light therapy, the degree of seasonality distributed equally to both treatment groups, as expected.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    We implemented careful design features and enrolled community-based patients with bipolar disorder to better mirror clinical practice and improve the generalizability of the results.

    “We implemented careful design features and enrolled community-based patients with bipolar disorder to better mirror clinical practice and improve the generalizability of the results.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    This implicates a vulnerability to both seasonal and nonseasonal depression, which is consistent with published reports on the phenomenology of bipolar disorder.

    “This implicates a vulnerability to both seasonal and nonseasonal depression, which is consistent with published reports on the phenomenology of bipolar disorder (33).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [33] source
53 of 53
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Patients with bipolar disorder are susceptible to environmental cues that alter circadian rhythms and trigger relapse.

    “Patients with bipolar disorder are susceptible to environmental cues that alter circadian rhythms and trigger relapse.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Patients who were still actively enrolled at weeks 4-6 had fully (or nearly) completed the dose-titration protocol, and those who withdrew early also provided informative outcome data.

    “We assumed that patients who were still actively enrolled at weeks 4-6 had fully (or nearly) completed the dose-titration protocol, and those who withdrew early also provided informative outcome data.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The secondary longitudinal analyses assumed fixed effects of intervention group, study week, and group-by-week interaction, and a random patient effect.

    “we assumed fixed effects of intervention group, study week, and group-by-week interaction, and a random patient effect.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The mechanism of response to light therapy is unclear in bipolar disorder.

    “However, the mechanism of response is unclear in bipolar disorder.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Concurrent antidepressant treatment is a potential source of heterogeneity.

    “The inclusion of patients on concurrent antidepressant treatment was a potential source of heterogeneity”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Symptomatic remission should be expected by four to six weeks of treatment.

    “Symptomatic remission should be expected by four to six weeks of treatment (Sit et al. 2018; Lam et al. 2020).”

    From Light therapy for bipolar disorders: Clinical recommendations from the international society for bipolar disorders (ISBD) Chronobiology and Chronotherapy Task Force (2025) · cites this paper as Sit et al. 2018

    The Results passage reports remission in 68.2% of patients receiving adjunctive bright light therapy for bipolar depression during weeks 4–6, and the Discussion says its large effect emerged in that period. This supports the timing for that treatment and population, but not a general expectation of remission by four to six weeks of treatment. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Continued improvement can be observed after six weeks of treatment.

    “Continued improvement can be observed after six weeks of treatment (see dose-response relationship; (Sit et al. 2018)).”

    From Light therapy for bipolar disorders: Clinical recommendations from the international society for bipolar disorders (ISBD) Chronobiology and Chronotherapy Task Force (2025) · cites this paper as Sit et al. 2018

    The Discussion reports a large treatment effect between weeks 4 and 6 and suggests that a longer protocol might yield further improvement. It does not report observing continued improvement beyond six weeks; that is an extrapolation from the remission-rate trajectory. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Only one study prospectively controlled for medication use by stratifying randomization based on whether antidepressants were used or not.

    “Only one study prospectively controlled for medication use by stratifying randomization based on whether antidepressants were used or not. 27”

    From Light Therapy for Patients With Bipolar Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (2020) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Procedures passage says patients were randomized to active or inactive light therapy and stratified by antidepressant use, supporting the description of this study's design. The paper does not establish that it was the only study to use that approach. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • BLT may enhance other dimensions of bipolar disorder, such as sleep quality, cognitive performance, and anxiety.

    “Furthermore, BLT may enhance other dimensions of BD, such as sleep quality, cognitive performance, and anxiety (Sit et al. 2018; Takeshima et al. 2020; Bisdounis et al. 2022).”

    From Light therapy for bipolar disorders: Clinical recommendations from the international society for bipolar disorders (ISBD) Chronobiology and Chronotherapy Task Force (2025) · cites this paper as Sit et al. 2018

    The Secondary Outcome Measures section reports better sleep quality and less anxiety with active light therapy than with placebo, but neither difference was statistically significant. It also reports less trouble concentrating, which is relevant to cognition, but does not establish improved cognitive performance. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There were 3 studies with light intensities ≤5000 lux (2 cohort studies and 1 randomized controlled trial), and only the cohort study results were assessed.

    “There were 3 studies with light intensities≤5000 lux,2 cohort studies [52,53], and 1 RCT [54]. Only the cohort study results were assessed.”

    From Bright light therapy in the treatment of patients with bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as [53]

    The Abstract identifies this paper as a randomized controlled trial, supporting its citation as the RCT. But the Dosage Titration and Follow-up section specifies 7,000-lux active light and 50-lux placebo light; the trial's active treatment was not ≤5,000 lux. The statement about assessing only cohort results describes the citing authors' analysis, not a finding attributed to this trial. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Leibenluft E, 1995, Psychopharmacol Bull, 31, 705
  2. Mishima K, 2001, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 86, 129
  3. First MB, 1996, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Patient Edition
  4. Williams JBW, 2003, Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale With Atypical Depression Supplement (SIGH-ADS)
  5. Horne JA, 1976, Int J Chronobiol, 4, 97

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sit, D. K., McGowan, J., Wiltrout, C., Diler, R. S., Dills, J. (., Luther, J., Yang, A., Ciolino, J. D., Seltman, H., Wisniewski, S. R., Terman, M., & Wisner, K. L.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and the Department of Preventive Medicine–Biostatistics Division, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago; the Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh; the Epidemiological Data Center, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh; the Department of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh; and the...
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2018-02-01
Volume
175
Issue
2
Pages
131-139
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2762262043
Cited by
182
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 2
FWCI
8.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
bright light therapy, bipolar depression, bipolar disorder, sleep quality, antidepressant efficacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Bipolar Disorder, Combined Modality Therapy, Depression, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review