Cited by 129COVID-19 and Mental HealthCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 7 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

The early impact of COVID-19 on mental health and community physical health services and their patients' mortality in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, UK.

Open access

Abstract

Background COVID-19 has affected social interaction and healthcare worldwide.Methods We examined changes in presentations and referrals to the primary provider of mental health and community health services in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, UK (population ~0·86 million), plus service activity and deaths. We conducted interrupted time series analyses with respect to the time of UK "lockdown", which was shortly before the peak of COVID-19 infections in this area. We examined changes in standardized mortality ratio for those with and without severe mental illness (SMI).Results Referrals and presentations to nearly all mental and physical health services dropped at lockdown, with evidence for changes in both supply (service provision) and demand (help-seeking). This was followed by an increase in demand for some services. This pattern was seen for all major forms of presentation to liaison psychiatry services, except for eating disorders, for which there was no evidence of change. Inpatient numbers fell, but new detentions under the Mental Health Act were unchanged. Many services shifted from face-to-face to remote contacts. Excess mortality was primarily in the over-70s. There was a much greater increase in mortality for patients with SMI, which was not explained by ethnicity.Conclusions COVID-19 has been associated with a system-wide drop in the use of mental health services, with some subsequent return in activity. "Supply" changes may have reduced access to mental health services for some. "Demand" changes may reflect a genuine reduction of need or a lack of help-seeking with pent-up demand. There has been a disproportionate increase in death among those with SMI during the pandemic.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.09.020

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

61 Own result · 18 Own interpretation · 13 No basis given · 11 Own method · 7 Not checked yet

Verify all 7 references — free account

Show all 72 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 27
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 11
38 of 38
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    CPFT is the sole provider of all secondary care mental health services to Cambridgeshire and Peterborough.

    “CPFT) provides community PH services, psychological therapy services, and all secondary care MH services (including some embedded within primary care) to C&P”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Lifetime coded ICD-10 diagnoses adequately identify severe mental illness despite possible under-coding.

    “Any under-coding of diagnosis was unmeasured.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    CPFT provides psychological therapy and all secondary mental health care to the entire population of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough.

    “because CPFT provides psychological therapy and all secondary MH care to the entire population of C&P”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    For some services, activity is driven by patient self-presentation rather than service supply.

    “For some services, though, activity is driven by patient self-presentation (e.g. 111 crisis calls, attendance at EDs/MIUs) yet activity dropped nonetheless.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 129

Metadata

Authors
Chen, S., Jones, P. B., Underwood, B. R., Moore, A., Bullmore, E. T., Banerjee, S., Osimo, E. F., Deakin, J. B., Hatfield, C. F., Thompson, F. J., Artingstall, J. D., Slann, M. P., Lewis, J. R., & Cardinal, R. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Fulbourn Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Cardinal, Rudolf N.
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
131
Pages
244-254
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3087124467
Cited by
127
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 5
FWCI
10.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, mental health services, standardized mortality ratio, severe mental illness, help-seeking, service supply and demand, lockdown, psychosomatic medicine, eating disorders, Mental Health Act detention, remote care, excess mortality, older adults
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Mental Disorders, Community Health Services, Community Mental Health Services, Female, United Kingdom, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pneumonia, Viral, Referral and Consultation, Infection Control, Coronavirus Infections, Young Adult, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review