CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 225Pain Management and Placebo EffectOptimism, Hope, and Well-beingPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Reconsidering the role of personality in placebo effects: Dispositional optimism, situational expectations, and the placebo response

Geers, Andrew L., Helfer, Suzanne G., Kosbab, Kristin, Weiland, Paul E., Landry, Sarah J.·2005·Journal of Psychosomatic Research
DOI 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2004.08.011
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective Prior investigations have failed to find reliable personality differences in placebo responding. The present study tests the hypothesis that personality and situational variables interact to determine placebo responding.Methods Optimists and pessimists were randomly assigned to one of three conditions. In the first condition, the participants were told that they were to ingest a pill that would make them feel unpleasant (deceptive-expectation group). In the second condition, the participants were told that they were to ingest a pill that would make them feel either unpleasant or was an inactive substance (conditional-expectation group). Finally, a third group was told they were to ingest a pill that was inactive (control group).Results Pessimists were more likely than optimists to follow a negative-placebo expectation when given a deceptive expectation, but not when given a conditional expectation.Conclusion The personality variable optimism-pessimism relates to placebo responding when individuals are given a deceptive but not a conditional expectation. This suggests that personality and situational variables interact to determine placebo responding.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2004.08.011

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The experience of pain results from both sensory input and psychological variables such as personality traits and anxiety level.

    “The experience of pain results from both sensory input and psychological variables such as personality traits and anxiety level1–5.”

    From Boundary effects of expectation in human pain perception (2019) · cites this paper as [2]

  • The experience of pain is strongly affected by other psychological variables such as optimism, anxiety, suggestibility, and reward responsiveness.

    “Our interest in individual differences was motivated by our own and others’ findings that the experience of pain is strongly affected by other psychological variables such as optimism, anxiety, suggestibility, and reward responsiveness1–5.”

    From Boundary effects of expectation in human pain perception (2019) · cites this paper as [2]

  • These findings fit with the notion that optimism and anxiety modulate nocebo, as well as placebo, responses.

    “These findings well fit with the notion that optimism and anxiety modulate nocebo, as well as placebo, responses12252641.”

    From Changes in perception of treatment efficacy are associated to the magnitude of the nocebo effect and to personality traits (2016) · cites this paper as [25]

  • Geers and colleagues found that when participants were told that a pill would have made them feel unpleasant, pessimists were more likely than optimists to report the expected negative symptoms.

    “Geers and colleagues25 found that when participants were told that a pill would have made them feel unpleasant, pessimists were more likely than optimists to report the expected negative symptoms.”

    From Changes in perception of treatment efficacy are associated to the magnitude of the nocebo effect and to personality traits (2016) · cites this paper as [25]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Geers, A. L., Helfer, S. G., Kosbab, K., Weiland, P. E., & Landry, S. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Toledo (US)
  • Adrian College (US)
Corresponding author
Geers, Andrew L.
ORCID
Geers, Andrew L.
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-02
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
121-127
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jpsychores.2004.08.011
OpenAlex
W2076911676
Cited by
225
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
placebo effect, personality, dispositional optimism, pessimism, conditional expectation, placebo response
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Attitude, Female, Humans, Male, Personality, Personality Tests, Placebos, Surveys and Questionnaires, Placebo Effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review