Cited by 85Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryCardiac Health and Mental HealthAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

Fear of recurrence and beliefs about preventing recurrence in persons who have suffered a stroke

Townend, Ellen, Tinson, Deborah, Kwan, Joseph, Sharpe, Michael·2006·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate fear of recurrent stroke and beliefs about its causes and prevention.Methods Eighty-nine patients participated 1 month following stroke and 81 were followed up at 9 months. Interviews addressed fears and beliefs about stroke, causes, recurrence and prevention by using closed and open-ended questions. Responses were subject to quantitative and qualitative analysis, respectively.Results Fear of recurrence was common. Profound disability was a particularly feared outcome. Participants were knowledgeable about causes. However, causal controllability ratings were low. Some reported concern about preventative strategies (e.g., difficulty stopping smoking). Many reported idiosyncratic beliefs (e.g., avoiding overexertion) or fatalistic ideas about strokes (e.g., 'nothing' can prevent them). Similar quantitative results were obtained at follow-up.Conclusions Many patients fear stroke recurrence. They lack a sense of control over causes and have fears associated with idiosyncratic and fatalistic beliefs. There is a need to elicit and address individuals' own fears and beliefs about stroke before providing evidence-based secondary prevention recommendations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.09.006

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fear of illness recurrence (FIR) has been widely studied in cancer and other chronic health conditions and is associated with greater avoidance of illness reminders, disregarding symptom changes, and social withdrawal.

    “FIR has been widely studied in cancer and other chronic health conditions and is associated with greater avoidance of illness reminders (e.g., medical appointments), disregarding symptom changes, and social withdrawal [13–16].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Townend, E., Tinson, D., Kwan, J., & Sharpe, M.
Affiliations
  • Glasgow Caledonian University (GB)
  • Astley Ainslie Hospital (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Townend, Ellen
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-12
Volume
61
Issue
6
Pages
747-755
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1963483946
Cited by
85
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Keywords
stroke, fear of recurrence, fatalism, stroke prevention, secondary prevention, disability, smoking cessation
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Culture, Fear, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review