Cited by 4,964Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsSocial Science and Policy ResearchData Analysis and Archiving

Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research

·2002·Analyzing Qualitative Data

Abstract

The last two decades have seen a notable growth in the use of qualitative methods for applied social policy research. Qualitative research is now used to explore and understand a diversity of social and public policy issues, either as an independent research strategy or in combination with some form of statistical inquiry. The wider use of qualitative methods has come about for a number of reasons but is underpinned by the persistent requirement in social policy fields to understand complex behaviours, needs, systems and cultures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203413081-14

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The researchers adopted framework analysis, a form of directed content analysis wherein researchers first familiarise themselves with the data, develop an analytical framework, and subsequently index data according to this framework.

    “Consequently, we adopted framework analysis (Ritchie and Spencer, 2002; Goldsmith, 2021), a form of directed content analysis wherein researchers first familiarise themselves with the data, develop an analytical framework, and subsequently index data according to this framework.”

    From Vibe coding: programming through conversation with artificial intelligence (2025) · cites this paper as Ritchie and Spencer, 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
Analyzing Qualitative Data
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2002-09-09
Pages
187-208
OpenAlex
W1588965071
Cited by
4,964
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 85 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 314 · 2020: 298 · 2019: 331 · 2018: 284 · 2017: 277 · 2016: 291 · 2015: 361 · 2014: 386 · 2013: 357 · 2012: 313
FWCI
415.52
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Science and Policy Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Data Analysis and Archiving
Keywords
qualitative data analysis, social policy, mixed methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review