Cited by 97Cardiac Health and Mental HealthPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Heart-focused anxiety before and after cardiac surgery

Hoyer, Jürgen, Eifert, Georg H., Einsle, Franziska, Zimmermann, Katrin, Krauss, Stefanie, Knaut, Michael, Matschke, Klaus, Köllner, Volker·2008·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Objective We investigated the degree and course of heart-focused anxiety (HFA) in patients with cardiac diseases before and after cardiac surgery. Methods We examined 90 patients undergoing coronary bypass, valve replacement, or combined surgery before surgery, 6 weeks after surgery, and 6 months after surgery. Patients completed the Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire (CAQ), which assesses heart-focused fear, attention, and avoidance, and a set of other questionnaires assessing general anxiety, depression, and quality of life. Data were compared with an age- and sex-controlled contrast group of 72 orthopedic patients with no history of cardiac disease. Results All dimensions of HFA were elevated in patients before surgery. CAQ-Fear was significantly reduced 6 weeks after surgery and at 6-month follow-up. CAQ-Avoidance was stable after surgery but declined on follow-up, while there was only a statistical tendency indicating reduction in CAQ-Attention. Approximately 20% of patients continued to experience clinically elevated levels of HFA at 6-month follow-up. Furthermore, we found decreases in global anxiety and depression, and an increase in quality of life after surgery. Conclusions In contrast to global psychosocial indicators, the more specific assessment of HFA may help identify individuals with elevated levels of HFA who might benefit from interventions to help them adjust to the effects of surgery and lingering cardiac problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.09.009

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoyer, J., Eifert, G. H., Einsle, F., Zimmermann, K., Krauss, S., Knaut, M., Matschke, K., & Köllner, V.
Affiliations
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • Chapman University (US)
  • Herzzentrum Dresden Universitätsklinik (DE)
  • Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes (DE)
Corresponding author
Hoyer, Jürgen
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
64
Issue
3
Pages
291-297
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033064105
Cited by
97
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
cardiac surgery, coronary artery bypass grafting, heart valve replacement, cardiac anxiety, depression, quality of life, cardiac patients
MeSH terms
Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Coronary Artery Bypass, Attention, Escape Reaction, Fear, Female, Heart Diseases, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Period, Surveys and Questionnaires, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review