Cited by 349Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesCardiac Health and Mental HealthPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

The Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire: development and preliminary validity

Eifert, Georg H, Thompson, Risa N, Zvolensky, Michael J, Edwards, Kimberly, Frazer, Nicole L, Haddad, John W, Davig, James·2000·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Heart-focused anxiety (HFA) is the fear of cardiac-related stimuli and sensations because of their perceived negative consequences. Although HFA is common to a wide variety of persons who experience chest pain and distress, it often is unrecognized and misdiagnosed, particularly in cardiology and emergency room patients without and with heart disease. To address these concerns, this article reports on the development and preliminary psychometric evaluation of the Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire (CAQ) designed to measure HFA. In Study 1, 188 cardiology patients completed the CAQ. Item and factor analyses indicated a three-factor solution pertaining to heart-related fear, avoidance, and attention. Reliability analysis of the 18-item CAQ revealed good internal consistency of the total and subscale scores. In Study 2, 42 patients completed the CAQ and several other anxiety-related questionnaires to assess its convergent and divergent properties. Although preliminary validity results are promising, further psychometric study is necessary to cross-validate the CAQ, examine its test-retest reliability, and confirm the stability of the factor structure. Taken together, the CAQ appears to assess HFA, and may therefore be a useful instrument for identifying patients with elevated HFA without and with heart disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00132-1

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eifert, G. H., Thompson, R. N., Zvolensky, M. J., Edwards, K., Frazer, N. L., Haddad, J. W., & Davig, J.
Affiliations
West Virginia University (US)
Corresponding author
Eifert, Georg H
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-10
Volume
38
Issue
10
Pages
1039-1053
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015235226
Cited by
349
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
psychometric development, questionnaire validation, avoidance, attention, chest pain, cardiac patients, anxiety assessment, factor structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review