Would higher salaries keep teachers in high-poverty schools? Evidence from a policy intervention in North Carolina
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A $1,800 bonus payment in North Carolina reduces attrition rates by 17 percent.
“Clotfelter et al. (2008) estimate that a $1,800 bonus payment in North Carolina reduces attrition rates by 17 percent.”
From Measuring the Impacts of Teachers II: Teacher Value-Added and Student Outcomes in Adulthood (2014) · cites this paper as Clotfelter et al. (2008)
Cites
Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement
Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x · Cited by 4,501 · see citing works
Teacher-Student Matching and the Assessment of Teacher Effectiveness
Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2006) · Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.3368/jhr.xli.4.778 · Cited by 739 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Measuring the Impacts of Teachers II: Teacher Value-Added and Student Outcomes in Adulthood
Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., & Rockoff, J. E. (2014) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.104.9.2633 · Cited by 1,717 · see citing works
The Hidden Costs of Teacher Turnover
Sorensen, L. C., & Ladd, H. F. (2020) · AERA Open · doi:10.1177/2332858420905812 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Self-citationTeacher applicant hiring and teacher performance: Evidence from DC public schools
Jacob, B. A., Rockoff, J. E., Taylor, E. S., Lindy, B., & Rosen, R. (2018) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.08.011 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
What teachers want: School factors predicting teachers’ decisions to work in low-performing schools
Viano, S., Pham, L. D., Henry, G. T., Kho, A., & Zimmer, R. (2021) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831220930199 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Sandoval-Olascoaga, S., Venkataramani, A. S., & Arcaya, M. C. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.29041 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Tang, Y., He, W., Liu, L., & Li, Q. (2018) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540602.2018.1470972 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Cooc, N. (2019) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x19852306 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Clotfelter, C., Glennie, E., Ladd, H., & Vigdor, J.
- Affiliations
- National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Vigdor, Jacob
- Venue
- Journal of Public Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 1352-1370
- ISSN
- 0047-2727 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3025552594
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 45.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Public Economics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Politics, Economics, and Education Policy
- Keywords
- teacher retention, teacher turnover, teacher bonuses, wage differentials, high-poverty schools, low-performing schools, special education teachers, secondary schools, information asymmetry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
