The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The unintended consequences of internet diffusion: Evidence from Malaysia
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, detrimental associations were found for trust in governments and politics59,60,66,78–82, trust in media83, and social and institutional trust84.”
From A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy (2022) · cites this paper as [60]
In the citing paper
“Common causal inference techniques that were used in our sample include instrumental variable designs that introduce exogenous variation in the treatment variable59–63, matching approaches to explicitly balance treatment and control groups64–66, and panel designs that account for unobserved confounders with unit and/or time-fixed effects67,68.”
From A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy (2022) · cites this paper as [60]
In the citing paper
“Leaving the US and European political context, in Malaysia, internet exposure was found to cause decreasing support for the authoritarian, populist government60.”
From A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy (2022) · cites this paper as [60]
Citations
Cites
Jensen, R. (2007) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.122.3.879 · Cited by 1,886
The Fox News Effect: Media Bias and Voting
DellaVigna, S., & Kaplan, E. (2007) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.122.3.1187 · Cited by 1,602
Risk Sharing and Transactions Costs: Evidence from Kenya's Mobile Money Revolution
Jack, W., & Suri, T. (2014) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.104.1.183 · Cited by 1,435
Handcuffs for the Grabbing Hand? Media Capture and Government Accountability
Besley, T. J., & Prat, A. (2006) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.96.3.720 · Cited by 1,126
Ideological Segregation Online and Offline *
Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2011) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjr044 · Cited by 980
Gentzkow, M. (2006) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.121.3.931 · Cited by 842
Causes of Sprawl: A Portrait from Space
Burchfield, M., Overman, H. G., Puga, D., & Turner, M. A. (2006) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.587 · Cited by 746
Radio's Impact on Public Spending
Stromberg, D. (2004) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355304772839560 · Cited by 729
Karlan, D., Stephen, S., Welch, K., & Quddus, S. (2009) · American Economic Journal Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app.1.2.35 · Cited by 667
Media and Political Persuasion: Evidence from Russia
Enikolopov, R., Petrova, M., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.7.3253 · Cited by 568
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Besley, 2002, The political economy of government responsiveness: theory and evidence from India, Q. J. Econ., 117, 1415, 10.1162/003355302320935061 · DOI
- Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission, 2013, 2, 12
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Political Effects of the Internet and Social Media
Zhuravskaya, E., Petrova, M., & Enikolopov, R. (2020) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-050239 · Cited by 560
A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy
Lorenz-Spreen, P., Oswald, L., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01460-1 · Cited by 348
3G Internet and Confidence in Government
Guriev, S., Melnikov, N., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2021) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjaa040 · Cited by 255
Operationalising positive tipping points towards global sustainability
Lenton, T. M., Benson, S., Smith, T., Ewer, T., Lanel, V., Petykowski, E., Powell, T. W. R., Abrams, J. F., Blomsma, F., & Sharpe, S. (2022) · Global Sustainability · doi:10.1017/sus.2021.30 · Cited by 256
Politics 2.0: The Multifaceted Effect of Broadband Internet on Political Participation
Campante, F. R., Durante, R., & Sobbrio, F. (2017) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1093/jeea/jvx044 · Cited by 250
Metadata
- Authors
- Miner, L.
- Corresponding author
- Miner, Luke
- Venue
- Journal of Public Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 132
- Pages
- 66-78
- ISSN
- 0047-2727 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2196418329
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 13.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Public Economics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › ICT Impact and Policies
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Keywords
- Internet diffusion, internet penetration, semi-authoritarian regimes, 2008 Malaysian general election, electoral swing, IP geolocation, political turnover, voter turnout, information technology and politics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
