The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 2 are not checked yet.
Political Effects of the Internet and Social Media
Open accessAbstract
How do the Internet and social media affect political outcomes? We review empirical evidence from the recent political economy literature, focusing primarily on work that considers traits that distinguish the Internet and social media from traditional off-line media, such as low barriers to entry and reliance on user-generated content. We discuss the main results about the effects of the Internet in general, and social media in particular, on voting, street protests, attitudes toward government, political polarization, xenophobia, and politicians’ behavior. We also review evidence on the role of social media in the dissemination of fake news, and we summarize results about the strategies employed by autocratic regimes to censor the Internet and to use social media for surveillance and propaganda. We conclude by highlighting open questions about how the Internet and social media shape politics in democracies and autocracies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Part of this trend might be explained by the Internet's informing users about government corruption (Zhuravskaya et al. 2020).”
From Social Media and Morality. (2024) · cites this paper as Zhuravskaya et al. 2020
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The spread of true and false news online
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aap9559 · Cited by 8,847
Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.31.2.211 · Cited by 6,767
Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa1160 · Cited by 3,245
A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization
Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D. I., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., & Fowler, J. H. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11421 · Cited by 2,575
How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression
KING, G., PAN, J., & ROBERTS, M. E. (2013) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055413000014 · Cited by 2,415
Müller, J.-W. (2016) · doi:10.9783/9780812293784 · Cited by 2,219
The net delusion: the dark side of Internet freedom
Murphy, D. M. (2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-7161 · Cited by 1,907
Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election
Grinberg, N., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Swire-Thompson, B., & Lazer, D. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau2706 · Cited by 1,803
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook
Guess, A., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aau4586 · Cited by 1,652
Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2006) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/499414 · Cited by 1,274
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Autor D, 2017, A note on the effect of rising trade exposure on the 2016 presidential elections
- Barberá P., 2015, How social media reduces mass political polarization: evidence from Germany, Spain, and the US
- Bessone P, 2019, Internet access, social media, and the behavior of politicians: evidence from Brazil
- Dal Bó E, 2018, Economic losers and political winners: Sweden's radical right
- Dustmann C, 2017, Europe's Trust Deficit: Causes and Remedies
- Enikolopov R, 2015, Handbook of Media Economics, 1, 687
- Field M, 2018, Telegraph
- Furceri D, 2019, Global incidents of corruption index
- Gladwell M., 2010, The New Yorker, 27
- Independent, 2019, Independent
- Inglehart R., 2018, Foreign Aff, 97, 20
- Krastev I., 2018, Foreign Aff, 97, 49
- Laub Z., 2019, Hate speech on social media: global comparisons
- Martin D, 2018, J. Inform. Warfare, 18
- Mitchell A, 2019, Many Americans say made-up news is a critical problem that needs to be fixed
- Mounk Y, 2018, Foreign Aff, 97, 29
- Qin B, 2019, Social media, information networks, and protests in China
- Rosenberg M, 2018, New York Times
- Rotesi T., 2018, Do social media matter? The impact of Twitter on political participation
- Schaub M, 2019, Eur. J. Political Res.
- Shane S., 2017, New York Times
- Silverman C., 2016, BuzzFeed
- Sunstein CR., 2001, Republic.com.
- Tufekci Z., 2018, MIT Technology Review, 14
- Yanagizawa-Drott D, 2020, Echo chambers: Does online network structure affect political polarization?
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social Media, News Consumption, and Polarization: Evidence from a Field Experiment
Levy, R. (2021) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20191777 · Cited by 624
The Political Economy of Populism
Guriev, S. M., & Papaioannou, E. (2020) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20201595 · Cited by 639
Social Media and Mental Health
Braghieri, L., Levy, R., & Makarin, A. (2022) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20211218 · Cited by 673
Why Does China Allow Freer Social Media? Protests versus Surveillance and Propaganda
Qin, B., Strömberg, D., & Wu, Y. (2017) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.31.1.117 · Cited by 353
More human than human: measuring ChatGPT political bias
Motoki, F., Pinho Neto, V., & Rodrigues, V. (2024) · Public Choice · doi:10.1007/s11127-023-01097-2 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhuravskaya, E., Petrova, M., & Enikolopov, R.
- Affiliations
- Paris School of Economics (FR)
- New Economic School (RU)
- Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08002 Barcelona, Spain
- Venue
- Annual Review of Economics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2020-08-02
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 415-438
- ISSN
- 1941-1383 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-1391
- OpenAlex
- W3123948795
- Cited by
- 560
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2026: 76 · 2025: 105 · 2024: 133 · 2023: 113 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 14
- FWCI
- 20.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- Locations
- Annual Review of Economics (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Keywords
- internet, social media, political outcomes, voting, street protests, attitudes toward government, political polarization, xenophobia, fake news, internet censorship, authoritarian regimes, surveillance, propaganda, democracy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review