CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 54

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Frontier imaginings and subversive Indigenous spatialities

Prout, Sarah, Howitt, Richard·2009·Journal of Rural Studies
DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.05.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.05.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Issues connected to the aggressive organisation of rural space or the impacts connected to live, wooden, or steel fence alterations are nearly impossible to assess comprehensively within a GIS model of this scale.

    “In addition, there are the issues connected to the aggressive organisation of rural space or the impacts connected to live, wooden, or steel fence alterations (Philo 1992, p. 197; Prout & Howitt 2009, p. 397), but these are nearly impossible to assess comprehensively within a GIS model of this scale.”

    From Exploratory GIS: modelling past land use and occupancy with functional connectivity, willandra lakes region world heritage area, NSW, australia (2022) · cites this paper as Prout & Howitt 2009, p. 397

  • There are issues connected to the aggressive organisation of rural space or the impacts connected to live, wooden, or steel fence alterations, but these are nearly impossible to assess comprehensively within a GIS model of this scale.

    “In addition, there are the issues connected to the aggressive organisation of rural space or the impacts connected to live, wooden, or steel fence alterations (Philo 1992, p. 197; Prout & Howitt 2009, p. 397), but these are nearly impossible to assess comprehensively within a GIS model of this scale.”

    From Exploratory GIS: modelling past land use and occupancy with functional connectivity, willandra lakes region world heritage area, NSW, australia (2022) · cites this paper as Prout & Howitt 2009, p. 397

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Arthur, 1994, Cultural autonomy, economic equity and self-determination within nation-states: Australian Aborigines in remote regions, Australian Aboriginal Studies, 28
  2. Bancroft, 2001, Closed spaces, restricted places: marginalisation of Roma in Europe, Space and Polity, 5, 145, 10.1080/13562570120104454 · DOI
  3. Chesterman, 2001, Defending Australia's reputation: how Indigenous Australians won civil rights, part 2, Australian Historical Studies, 32, 201, 10.1080/10314610108596161 · DOI
  4. Cloke, 2000, Homelessness and rurality: ‘out-of-place’ in purified space, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18, 715, 10.1068/d34j · DOI
  5. Cloke, 2003, The complex mobilities of Homeless people in rural England, Geoforum, 34, 21, 10.1016/S0016-7185(02)00041-6 · DOI
  6. Fink, R., 1960. The changing status and cultural identity of Western Australian Aborigines: a field study of Aborigines in the Murchison District, Western Australia 1955–1957. PhD Thesis. Columbia University, New York.
  7. Gelder, 1995, Uncanny Australia, Ecumene, 2, 171, 10.1177/147447409500200204 · DOI
  8. Gibson, 2004, Tamworth, Australia's ‘country music captial’: place marketing, rurality, and resident reactions, Journal of Rural Studies, 20, 387, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2004.03.001 · DOI
  9. Gill, 2005, Life and death in Australian ‘heartlands’: pastoralism, ecology and rethinking the outback, Journal of Rural Studies, 21, 39, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2004.08.005 · DOI
  10. Halfacree, 1996, Out of place in the country: travellers and the rural idyll, Antipode, 28, 42, 10.1111/j.1467-8330.1996.tb00671.x · DOI
  11. Hamilton, 1987, Coming and going: Aboriginal mobility in north-west South Australia, 1970–71, Records of the South Australian Museum, 20, 47
  12. Holloway, 2007, Burning issues: whiteness, rurality and the politics of difference, Geoforum, 38, 7, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.01.004 · DOI
  13. Howitt, 1991, Aborigines and restructuring in the mining sector: vested and representative interests, Australian Geographer, 22, 117, 10.1080/00049189108703035 · DOI
  14. Howitt, 2001, Frontiers borders, edges: liminal challenges to the hegemony of exclusion, Australian Geographical Studies, 39, 233, 10.1111/1467-8470.00142 · DOI
  15. Lawrence, 1991, Motorised transport in Aboriginal Australia, Australian Aboriginal Studies, 2, 62
  16. Little, 1999, Otherness, representation and the cultural construction of rurality, Progress in Human Geography, 23, 437, 10.1177/030913259902300307 · DOI
  17. Long, 1989, Leaving the desert: actors and sufferers in the Aboriginal exodus from the Western Desert, Aboriginal History, 13, 9
  18. Matthews, 2000, Growing-up in the countryside: children and the rural idyll, Journal of Rural Studies, 16, 141, 10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00059-5 · DOI
  19. Menage, 1998, Contested spaces, contested times: the day of mourning and protest site, Public History Review, 7, 119
  20. Peters, 1998, Subversive spaces: first Nations women and the city, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 16, 665, 10.1068/d160665 · DOI
  21. Peters, 2006, “[W]e do not lose our treaty rights outside the. reserve”: challenging the scales of social service provision for First Nations women in Canadian cities, Geojournal, 65, 315, 10.1007/s10708-006-0026-9 · DOI
  22. Peterson, 2003, The modernising of the indigenous domestic moral economy, The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 4, 105, 10.1080/14442210310001706407 · DOI
  23. Petrova, 2003, The Roma: between myth and future, Social Research, 70, 111, 10.1353/sor.2003.0041 · DOI
  24. Philo, 1992, Neglected rural geographies: a review, Journal of Rural Studies, 8, 193, 10.1016/0743-0167(92)90077-J · DOI · Paper page
  25. Prout, S., 2007. Security and belonging: reconceptualising Aboriginal spatial mobilities in Yamatji country, Western Australia. PhD Thesis. Macquarie University, Sydney.
  26. Prout, 2009, Security and belonging: reconceptualising Aboriginal spatial mobilities in Yamatji country, Mobilities, 4, 177, 10.1080/17450100902905105 · DOI
  27. Prout, S. Vacuums and veils: engaging with statistically ‘invisible’ Indigenous population dynamics. Geographical Research, in press.
  28. Shamir, 1996, Suspended in space: Bedouins under the law of Israel, Law and Society Review, 30, 231, 10.2307/3053959 · DOI
  29. Sutton, 2001, The Politics of Suffering: Indigenous Policy in Australia Since the 1970s, Anthropological Forum, 11, 125, 10.1080/00664670125674 · DOI
  30. Taylor, 1989, Public policy and Aboriginal population mobility: insights from the Katherine region, Northern Territory, Australian Geographer, 2, 47, 10.1080/00049188908702974 · DOI
  31. Taylor, 1996, Population mobility and Indigenous peoples: the view from Australia, International Journal of Population Geography, 2, 153, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1220(199606)2:2<153::AID-IJPG19>3.0.CO;2-U · DOI
  32. Wilson, 2005, “You can make a place for it”: remapping urban First Nations spaces of identity, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23, 395, 10.1068/d390 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Prout, S., & Howitt, R.
Venue
Journal of Rural Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
396-403
ISSN
0743-0167
DOI
10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.05.006
Cited by
54
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review