Informing women and improving sanitation: Evidence from rural India.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In India, the odds of having a latrine was significantly higher in households where women were the main decision makers, and in Kenya, the likelihood of a household owning an improved sanitation facility was significantly higher when women had at least some input on decisions about major household purchases.
“With respect to sanitation, in India, the odds of having a latrine was significantly higher in households where women were the main decision makers [136] and in Kenya, the likelihood of a household owning an improved sanitation facility was significantly higher when women had at least some input on decisions about major household purchases [134].”
From Water, sanitation, and women’s empowerment: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [136]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 65 · Cited by 15
- Authors
- Lee, Y. J.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lee, YuJung Julia
- ORCID
- Lee, YuJung Julia
- Venue
- Journal of Rural Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 55
- Pages
- 203-215
- ISSN
- 0743-0167 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2751195697
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Rural Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Energy and Environment Impacts
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
- Keywords
- sanitation, latrine ownership, mass media, health knowledge, women's decision-making power, household decision-making, radio ownership, television ownership, rural India, rural poor, sanitation campaigns
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
