Cited by 217Connective tissue disorders researchSports injuries and preventionLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

The effects of gender and pubertal status on generalized joint laxity in young athletes

Open access
Quatman, Carmen E., Ford, Kevin R., Myer, Gregory D., Paterno, Mark V., Hewett, Timothy E.·2008·Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

Abstract

Our purpose was to examine the effects of pubertal status on generalized joint laxity in a population of male and female athletes. We hypothesized that females would show higher generalized joint laxity after the onset of puberty while males would not. This cross-sectional cohort study included 275 female and 143 male middle school and high school basketball and soccer athletes. Joint laxity was assessed using the Beighton and Horan Joint Mobility Index. BHJMI scores were averaged and female and male athletes were compared by pubertal stage. Females demonstrated increased joint laxity scores between pre-pubertal and post-pubertal groups (P=0.042), while males did not. Pre-pubertal male and female athletes were not different in cumulative joint laxity scores (female pre-puberty mean=2.00; male pre-pubertal mean=1.66). However, following the onset of puberty females (pubertal mean=2.96; post-pubertal mean=3.03) demonstrated a greater joint laxity score compared to males (pubertal mean=1.24; post-pubertal mean=1.30). Gender differences in BHJMI score was found at puberty and post-puberty (P<0.001). In contrast to males, females may have greater generalized joint laxity following the onset of puberty. Structural and physiological changes that occur during puberty such as alterations in passive joint restraints, may affect the type, severity and incidence of injuries in the maturing adolescent population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsams.2007.05.005

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quatman, C. E., Ford, K. R., Myer, G. D., Paterno, M. V., & Hewett, T. E.
Affiliations
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Hewett, Timothy E.
Venue
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
257-263
ISSN
1440-2440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993837858
Cited by
217
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of science and medicine in sport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR049735, R01AR056259)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Keywords
generalized joint laxity, puberty, sex differences, youth athletes, basketball, soccer, joint mobility
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Joint Instability, Male, Puberty, Sex Factors, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review