Cited by 208Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesFoot and Ankle SurgeryLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

The risk of anterior cruciate ligament rupture with generalised joint laxity

Open access
Ramesh, R., Von Arx, O., Azzopardi, T., Schranz, P. J.·2005·The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume

Abstract

We assessed hyperextension of the knee and joint laxity in 169 consecutive patients who underwent an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between 2000 and 2002 and correlated this with a selected number of age- and gender-matched controls. In addition, the mechanism of injury in the majority of patients was documented. Joint laxity was present in 42.6% (72 of 169) of the patients and hyperextension of the knee in 78.7% (133 of 169). All patients with joint laxity had hyperextension of their knee. In the control group only 21.5% (14 of 65) had joint laxity and 37% (24 of 65) had hyperextension of the knee. Statistical analysis showed a significant correlation for these associations. We conclude that anterior cruciate ligament injury is more common in those with joint laxity and particularly so for those with hyperextension of the knee.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1302/0301-620x.87b6.15833

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramesh, R., Von Arx, O., Azzopardi, T., & Schranz, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Unit 17 Sidney Williams House, Torbay Hospital, Newton Road, Torquay TQ2 7AA, UK, 47 First Avenue, Bath BA2 3NW, UK, Flat 2/R, 37 Cartha Street, Glasgow G41 3HH, UK, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital NHS Trust (Wonford), Barrack Road, Exeter EX2 5DW, UK.
Venue
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume
Published
2005-06
Volume
87-B
Issue
6
Pages
800-803
ISSN
  • 0301-620X (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-5377
OpenAlex
W2131905556
Cited by
208
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Foot and Ankle Surgery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Keywords
anterior cruciate ligament rupture, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, joint laxity, knee hyperextension, knee injury mechanism, risk factors, ligament injury
MeSH terms
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Joint Instability, Knee Joint, Male, Risk Factors, Rupture, Range of Motion, Articular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review