Cited by 332Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPain Management and Opioid Use

Injectable naltrexone, oral naltrexone, and buprenorphine utilization and discontinuation among individuals treated for opioid use disorder in a United States commercially insured population

Open access
Morgan, Jake R., Schackman, Bruce R., Leff, Jared A., Linas, Benjamin P., Walley, Alexander Y.·2018·Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Abstract

We investigated prescribing patterns for four opioid use disorder (OUD) medications: 1) injectable naltrexone, 2) oral naltrexone, 3) sublingual or oralmucosal buprenorphine/naloxone, and 4) sublingual buprenorphine as well as transdermal buprenorphine (which is approved for treating pain, but not OUD) in a nationally representative claims-based database (Truven Health MarketScan®) of commercially insured individuals in the United States. We calculated the prevalence of OUD in the database for each year from 2010 to 2014 and the proportion of diagnosed patient months on OUD medication. We compared characteristics of individuals diagnosed with OUD who did and did not receive these medications with bivariate descriptive statistics. Finally, we fit a Cox proportional hazards model of time to discontinuation of therapy as a function of therapy type, controlling for relevant confounders. From 2010 to 2014, the proportion of commercially insured individuals diagnosed with OUD grew by fourfold (0.12% to 0.48%), but the proportion of diagnosed patient-months on medication decreased from 25% in 2010 (0.05% injectable naltrexone, 0.4% oral naltrexone, 23.1% sublingual or oralmucosal buprenorphine/naloxone, 1.5% sublingual buprenorphine, and 0% transdermal buprenorphine) to 16% in 2014 (0.2% injectable naltrexone, 0.4% oral naltrexone, 13.8% sublingual or oralmucosal buprenorphine/naloxone, 1.4% sublingual buprenorphine, and 0.3% transdermal buprenorphine). Individuals who received medication therapy were more likely to be male, younger, and have an additional substance use disorder compared with those diagnosed with OUD who did not receive medication therapy. Those prescribed injectable naltrexone were more often male, younger, and diagnosed with additional substance use disorders compared with those prescribed other medications for opioid use disorder (MOUDs). At 30 days after initiation, 52% for individuals treated with injectable naltrexone, 70% for individuals treated with oral naltrexone, 31% for individuals treated with sublingual or oralmucosal buprenorphine/naloxone, 58% for individuals treated with sublingual buprenorphine, and 51% for individuals treated with transdermal buprenorphine discontinued treatment. In the Cox proportional hazard model, use of injectable naltrexone, oral naltrexone, sublingual buprenorphine, and transdermal buprenorphine were all associated with significantly greater hazard of discontinuing therapy beginning >30days after MOUD initiation (HR=2.17, 2.54, 1.15, and 2.21, respectively, 95% CIs 2.04-2.30, 2.45-2.64, 1.10-1.19, and 2.11-2.33), compared with the use of sublingual or oralmucosal buprenorphine/naloxone. This analysis demonstrates that the use of evidence-based medication therapies has not kept pace with increases in OUD diagnoses in commercially insured populations in the United States. Among those who have been treated, discontinuation rates >30days after initiation are high. The proportion treated with injectable naltrexone, oral naltrexone, and transdermal buprenorphine grew over time but remains small, and the discontinuation rates are higher among those treated with these medications compared with those treated with sublingual or oralmucosal buprenorphine/naloxone. In the face of the opioid overdose and addiction crisis, new efforts are needed at the provider, health system, and policy levels so that MOUD availability and uptake keep pace with new OUD diagnoses and OUD treatment discontinuation is minimized.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.07.001

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Access to and uptake of MOUD has risen, but the increase has not been substantial enough to reverse the trajectory of opioid overdose-related death rates.

    “Although access to and uptake of MOUD has risen, the increase has not been substantial enough to reverse the trajectory of opioid overdose–related death rates.7,8”

    From Economic Evaluation of Extended-Release Buprenorphine for Persons With Opioid Use Disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Results report that MOUD prescription-months rose 156% from 2010 to 2014 among commercially insured people with OUD, while the proportion of their person-time on medication fell from 25% to 16%. The Introduction describes an epidemic of overdose deaths, but the paper does not assess whether MOUD uptake reversed—or failed to reverse—the trajectory of overdose death rates. It also does not directly measure access to MOUD. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Medication treatment for OUD remains underutilized.

    “it remains underutilized”
  • Patients often drop out of medication treatment for OUD.

    “patients often drop out of medication treatment [50, 51].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Truven Health Analytics 2015 Truven Health MarketScan® commercial claims and encounters user guide: data year 2014 edition
  2. United States Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Surgeon General 2016 Facing Addiction in America: The Surgeon General’s Report on Alcohol, Drugs, and Health Retrieved from https://addiction.surgeongeneral.gov/surgeon-generals-report.pdf 28252892

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morgan, J. R., Schackman, B. R., Leff, J. A., Linas, B. P., & Walley, A. Y.
Affiliations
  • Boston Medical Center (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Morgan, Jake R.
Venue
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
85
Pages
90-96
ISSN
0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2729232923
Cited by
332
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 4
FWCI
25.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (P30DA040500, R01DA031059)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
opioid use disorder, injectable naltrexone, oral naltrexone, buprenorphine/naloxone, sublingual buprenorphine, transdermal buprenorphine, drug discontinuation, prescribing patterns, commercially insured patients, time to discontinuation
MeSH terms
Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination, Assessment of Medication Adherence, Adult, Age Factors, Analgesics, Opioid, Buprenorphine, Drug Administration Routes, Female, Humans, Insurance Claim Review, Male, Naltrexone, Narcotic Antagonists, Opioid-Related Disorders, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Sex Factors, United States, Prevalence, Drug Monitoring, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review