Cited by 44Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesSmoking Behavior and Cessation

Legalization of cannabis use in Canada: Impacts on the cannabis use profiles of youth seeking services for substance use

Open access
Hawke, Lisa D., Henderson, Joanna·2021·Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Abstract

Background Cannabis is a highly used substance among youth, but has the potential to negatively impact the developing brain. Recreational cannabis use was legalized in Canada in October 2018. This exploratory study examines cannabis use profiles of high-risk youth before and after the national legalization of recreational cannabis use. Method This cross-sectional cohort study examines the cannabis use profiles of two cohorts of youth, one recruited prior to legalization (N = 101) and one recruited after legalization (N = 168). Results This study found few changes in cannabis use patterns after legalization. The rate of high-frequency cannabis use, polysubstance use, social circles of use, and mental health and substance use challenges showed no change, and the study found no associations with age. Exceptions were that youth were more likely to report purchasing cannabis from a legal source after legalization. Concealment of cannabis use from legal authorities declined after legalization among youth over the age of majority (19+ years), but not among younger youth (<19 years). Conclusions Minimal changes have occurred in the cannabis use patterns of service-seeking youth in the short term following legalization. This holds true both for youth who have reached the age of majority and those who have not. Nevertheless, this population has overlapping substantial mental health and substance use challenges. Integrated services should address cannabis use and other concurrent challenges and be sensitive to the postlegalization social climate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108340

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is little evidence that RCL is associated with increased use rates of alcohol and cigarettes, and RCL may even be associated with decreased rates of cigarette use.

    “With regard to other substance use, primarily alcohol and cigarettes, there is little evidence that RCL is associated with increased use rates and may even be associated with decreased rates of cigarette use.42,61”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hawke, L. D., & Henderson, J.
Affiliations
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
Corresponding author
Henderson, Joanna
Venue
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
126
Pages
108340
ISSN
0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3130102592
Cited by
44
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 1
FWCI
6.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
cannabis legalization, recreational cannabis use, youth cannabis use, at-risk youth, substance use services, polydrug use, mental illness, age of majority, cannabis use patterns, Canada
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Canada, Cannabis, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Legislation, Drug, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review