Cited by 305Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Early evidence of the impact of cannabis legalization on cannabis use, cannabis use disorder, and the use of other substances: Findings from state policy evaluations

Open access
Smart, Rosanna, Pacula, Rosalie Liccardo·2019·The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse

Abstract

Background: The past decade has seen unprecedented shifts in the cannabis policy environment, and the public health impacts of these changes will hinge on how they affect patterns of cannabis use and the use and harms associated with other substances.Objectives: To review existing research on how state cannabis policy impacts substance use, emphasizing studies using methods for causal inference and highlighting gaps in our understanding of policy impacts on evolving cannabis markets.Methods: Narrative review of quasi-experimental studies for how medical cannabis laws (MCLs) and recreational cannabis laws (RCLs) affect cannabis use and use disorders, as well as the use of or harms from alcohol, opioids, and tobacco.Results: Research suggests MCLs increase adult but not adolescent cannabis use, and provisions of the laws associated with less regulated supply may increase adult cannabis use disorders. These laws may reduce some opioid-related harms, while their impacts on alcohol and tobacco use remain uncertain. Research on RCLs is just emerging, but findings suggest little impact on the prevalence of adolescent cannabis use, potential increases in college student use, and unknown effects on other substance use.Conclusions: Research on how MCLs influence cannabis use has advanced our understanding of the importance of heterogeneity in policies, populations, and market dynamics, but studies of how MCLs relate to other substance use often ignore these factors. Understanding effects of cannabis laws requires greater attention to differences in short- versus long-term effects of the laws, nuances of policies and patterns of consumption, and careful consideration of appropriate control groups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00952990.2019.1669626

Cites

115 of 115 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cannabis use is increasing in the US, partially due to more states legalizing recreational and medical cannabis and decriminalizing its possession and use.

    “These increases are partially due to more states legalizing recreational and medical cannabis, as well as decriminalizing its possession and use (Farrelly et al., 2023, Lapham et al., 2023, Smart and Pacula, 2019).”

    From Prevalence of and trends in current cannabis use among US youth and adults, 2013–2022 (2024) · cites this paper as Smart and Pacula, 2019

    The Conclusions (page unavailable) say that states adopting medical cannabis laws tend to experience increased adult cannabis use. But the Methods section reports insignificant effects of recreational legalization on adult use in the early studies it reviewed, and the cited passages do not establish that decriminalization increased use. The claim therefore attributes a broader explanation for rising US use to this source than its findings support. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The increases in cannabis use among adults but not youth may be attributed to or influenced by recent surges in legalization and decriminalization of cannabis use in the US.

    “These increases in adults, but not youth, use may be attributed to or influenced by recent surges in legalization and decriminalization of cannabis use in the US.”

    From Prevalence of and trends in current cannabis use among US youth and adults, 2013–2022 (2024) · cites this paper as Smart and Pacula, 2019

    The Abstract’s Results and the section on cannabis-use outcomes report that medical cannabis laws are associated with increased adult use but generally not adolescent use. The Introduction documents widespread US legalization and decriminalization, but the cited passages do not establish that decriminalization explains the adult–youth difference; evidence on recreational legalization was still emerging. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 116 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [46]Smart R. Essays on the effects of medical marijuana laws [PhD Dissertation]. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles; 2016.
  2. [50]Smart RG. Essays on the effects of medical marijuana laws [Doctoral Dissertation]. Los Angeles: University of California; 2016.
  3. [81]Hansen B, Miller K, Weber C. The taxation of recreational marijuana: evidence from Washington state. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2017 Contract No.: 23632.
  4. [115]Miech RA, Schulenberg JE, Johnston LD, Bachman JG, O’Malley PM, Patrick ME. National adolescent drug trends in 2018 [press release]. Ann Arbor, MI: Monitoring the Future; 2018 Available at: http://www.monitoringthefuture.org

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smart, R., & Pacula, R. L.
Affiliations
  • RAND Corporation (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Smart, Rosanna
Venue
The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse
Published
2019-10-11
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
644-663
ISSN
  • 0095-2990 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-9891
OpenAlex
W2980236327
Cited by
305
References
116
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 2
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2t32hd007545-21)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA026268)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (T32-HD007545, P2CHD041022)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
cannabis legalization, medical cannabis laws, cannabis use, cannabis use disorder, substance use, alcohol consumption, opioid use, tobacco use, adolescent cannabis use
MeSH terms
Marijuana Use, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Alcohol Drinking, Marijuana Abuse, Humans, Legislation, Drug, Opioid-Related Disorders, Public Policy, Substance-Related Disorders, Medical Marijuana, Tobacco Use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review