A pilot randomized trial of CBT4CBT for women in residential treatment for substance use disorders
Abstract
Introduction Despite the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for treatment of substance use disorder, dissemination to clinical practice is limited due to a range of barriers (e.g., time, cost). Computer-based training for cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT4CBT) offers a feasible and cost-effective opportunity to improve the quality and reach of SUD treatment. Research to date has supported the effectiveness of CBT4CBT in outpatient settings; however, research has not yet tested it in residential treatment. Methods The current study evaluated the feasibility of CBT4CBT as an adjunct to residential treatment in a sample of women with SUDs using a two-arm pilot RCT comparing women randomized to either standard residential treatment plus access to the CBT4CBT program (N = 34) or residential treatment alone (TAU; N = 29). Assessments occurred at baseline, discharge from residential care, and at 4- and 12-weeks post-discharge. The study compared the two groups over the 12-week follow-up period on relapse to any substance (Y/N), relapse to primary substance (Y/N), and days of use using chi-square for categorical and t-tests for continuous measures. The study team also performed a Kaplan-Meier analysis to compare the two groups on time to relapse. Results Demographically, the sample was predominantly African American (79.4%), with a mean age of 41.2 years (SD = 12.1). Although the current study was not powered for statistical significance, findings were in the predict…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CBT4CBT and TES appear to improve stimulant use outcomes when added to other behavioral interventions, but effects are not always durable.
“CBT4CBT and TES appear to improve stimulant use outcomes when added to other behavioral interventions; however, these effects are not always durable.82,83”
From The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [82]
Cites
A Meta-Analytic Review of Psychosocial Interventions for Substance Use Disorders
Dutra, L., Stathopoulou, G., Basden, S. L., Leyro, T. M., Powers, M. B., & Otto, M. W. (2008) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06111851 · Cited by 1,287 · see citing works
Substance abuse treatment entry, retention, and outcome in women: a review of the literature
Greenfield, S. F., Brooks, A. J., Gordon, S. M., Green, C. A., Kropp, F., McHugh, R. K., Lincoln, M., Hien, D., & Miele, G. M. (2007) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.05.012 · Cited by 1,055 · see citing works
Magill, M., & Ray, L. A. (2009) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs · doi:10.15288/jsad.2009.70.516 · Cited by 694 · see citing works
Sholomskas, D. E., Syracuse-Siewert, G., Rounsaville, B. J., Ball, S. A., Nuro, K. F., & Carroll, K. M. (2005) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.73.1.106 · Cited by 628 · see citing works
Self-citationCognitive Behavioral Therapy for Substance Use Disorders
McHugh, R. K., Hearon, B. A., & Otto, M. W. (2010) · Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.psc.2010.04.012 · Cited by 626 · see citing works
Relapse prevention for addictive behaviors
Hendershot, C. S., Witkiewitz, K., George, W. H., & Marlatt, G. A. (2011) · Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy · doi:10.1186/1747-597x-6-17 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
National Survey of Psychotherapy Training in Psychiatry, Psychology, and Social Work
Weissman, M. M., Verdeli, H., Gameroff, M. J., Bledsoe, S. E., Betts, K., Mufson, L., Fitterling, H., & Wickramaratne, P. (2006) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.925 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Carroll, K. M., Ball, S. A., Martino, S., Nich, C., Babuscio, T. A., Nuro, K. F., Gordon, M. A., Portnoy, G. A., & Rounsaville, B. J. (2008) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07111835 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder
(2024) · Journal of Addiction Medicine · doi:10.1097/adm.0000000000001299 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Psychosocial interventions for stimulant use disorder
Minozzi, S., Saulle, R., Amato, L., Traccis, F., & Agabio, R. (2024) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011866.pub3 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kelpin, S. S., Parlier-Ahmad, A. B., Jallo, N., Carroll, K., & Svikis, D. S.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kelpin, Sydney S.
- Venue
- Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 132
- Pages
- 108622
- ISSN
- 0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3022897363
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- substance use disorders, women, residential treatment, relapse prevention, dissemination of evidence-based treatment, adjunctive therapy, time to relapse
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aftercare, Female, Humans, Patient Discharge, Pilot Projects, Residential Treatment, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Treatment Outcome, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review