Cited by 10Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesDigital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

A pilot randomized trial of CBT4CBT for women in residential treatment for substance use disorders

Kelpin, Sydney S., Parlier-Ahmad, Anna Beth, Jallo, Nancy, Carroll, Kathleen, Svikis, Dace S.·2022·Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Abstract

Introduction Despite the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for treatment of substance use disorder, dissemination to clinical practice is limited due to a range of barriers (e.g., time, cost). Computer-based training for cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT4CBT) offers a feasible and cost-effective opportunity to improve the quality and reach of SUD treatment. Research to date has supported the effectiveness of CBT4CBT in outpatient settings; however, research has not yet tested it in residential treatment. Methods The current study evaluated the feasibility of CBT4CBT as an adjunct to residential treatment in a sample of women with SUDs using a two-arm pilot RCT comparing women randomized to either standard residential treatment plus access to the CBT4CBT program (N = 34) or residential treatment alone (TAU; N = 29). Assessments occurred at baseline, discharge from residential care, and at 4- and 12-weeks post-discharge. The study compared the two groups over the 12-week follow-up period on relapse to any substance (Y/N), relapse to primary substance (Y/N), and days of use using chi-square for categorical and t-tests for continuous measures. The study team also performed a Kaplan-Meier analysis to compare the two groups on time to relapse. Results Demographically, the sample was predominantly African American (79.4%), with a mean age of 41.2 years (SD = 12.1). Although the current study was not powered for statistical significance, findings were in the predict…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108622

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CBT4CBT and TES appear to improve stimulant use outcomes when added to other behavioral interventions, but effects are not always durable.

    “CBT4CBT and TES appear to improve stimulant use outcomes when added to other behavioral interventions; however, these effects are not always durable.82,83”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kelpin, S. S., Parlier-Ahmad, A. B., Jallo, N., Carroll, K., & Svikis, D. S.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Kelpin, Sydney S.
Venue
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
132
Pages
108622
ISSN
0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3022897363
Cited by
10
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
substance use disorders, women, residential treatment, relapse prevention, dissemination of evidence-based treatment, adjunctive therapy, time to relapse
MeSH terms
Adult, Aftercare, Female, Humans, Patient Discharge, Pilot Projects, Residential Treatment, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Treatment Outcome, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review