Cited by 178Corneal surgery and disordersCorneal Surgery and TreatmentsElasticity and Material Modeling

Lamellar orientation in human cornea in relation to mechanical properties

Boote, Craig, Dennis, Sally, Huang, Yifei, Quantock, Andrew J., Meek, Keith M.·2005·Journal of Structural Biology

Abstract

We have applied wide-angle X-ray scattering to the human cornea in order to quantify the relative number of stromal collagen fibrils directed along the two preferred corneal lamellar directions: superior-inferior and nasal-temporal. The data suggest that, on average, the two directions are populated in equal proportion at the corneal centre. Here, approximately one-third of the fibrils throughout the stromal depth tend to lie within a 45 degrees sector of the superior-inferior meridian, and similarly for the nasal-temporal direction. However, in some eyes we have measured significant differences between the two preferential fibril populations, with some corneas exhibiting as much as 25% more collagen in one direction than the other. Based on these findings, a mechanical model of the normal cornea may be envisaged, whereby the fibril tension in the underlying "background" of isotropically arranged collagen helps to balance the intraocular pressure; while the extra preferentially aligned fibrils take up the additional tensile stress along the superior-inferior and nasal-temporal meridians exerted by the rectus muscles and the orbicularis. It is possible that, through a direct impact on the elastic modulus of the tissue, an imbalance of superior-inferior and nasal-temporal fibrils in some eyes might affect corneal shape.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsb.2004.08.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The preferred orientations at the centre of the cornea may help withstand the pull of the extraocular muscles.

    “The directions at the centre of the cornea may help withstand the pull of the extraocular muscles”
  • Many of these preferred lamellae continue into the sclera and are believed to help the cornea withstand the pull of the extraocular muscles.

    “Many of these appear to continue into the sclera and are believed to help the cornea to withstand the pull of the extraocular muscles [17–19] (Fig. 5 inset).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boote, C., Dennis, S., Huang, Y., Quantock, A. J., & Meek, K. M.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Beijing Great Wall Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Boote, Craig
Venue
Journal of Structural Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
149
Issue
1
Pages
1-6
ISSN
1047-8477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026419440
Cited by
178
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Structural Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal Surgery and Treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Elasticity and Material Modeling
Keywords
corneal collagen fibrils, lamellar orientation, corneal stroma, corneal mechanical properties, intraocular pressure, corneal shape, elastic modulus, wide-angle X-ray scattering
MeSH terms
Collagen, Cornea, Corneal Stroma, Extracellular Matrix, Humans, Intraocular Pressure, X-Ray Diffraction, Stromal Cells, Mechanics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review