Cited by 55Tendon Structure and TreatmentMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationErgonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders

Tennis elbow: Associated psychological factors

Aben, Aurelie, De Wilde, Lieven, Hollevoet, Nadine, Henriquez, Carlos, Vandeweerdt, Marc, Ponnet, Koen, Van Tongel, Alexander·2018·Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Abstract

Background The etiology of tennis elbow is multifactorial. Overuse of the wrist extensors along with anatomic factors, such as flexibility problems, aging, and poor blood circulation, may play a role. This study investigated whether patients with tennis elbow have a different psychological profile compared with healthy controls.Methods Patients with clinical signs of tennis elbow, consulting at the Ghent University Hospital between September 2015 and January 2017, were offered a paper-and-pencil questionnaire about Big Five personality traits, perfectionism, anxiety, depression, work satisfaction, and working conditions. Healthy controls in the same risk group were offered the same questionnaires.Results We recruited 69 patients (35 men, 34 women) and 100 controls (44 men, 56 women). Tennis elbow patients scored significantly lower on the personality traits extraversion and agreeableness. Men, in particular, scored significantly higher on perfectionism and were more likely to develop an anxiety disorder or a depression. Concerning work, patients indicated a significantly higher workload (especially men) and a significantly lower autonomy (especially women). Female patients also indicated less contact with colleagues. However, work satisfaction was relatively high in both groups.Conclusion The results suggest that there is a relationship between complaints related to tennis elbow and psychological characteristics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jse.2017.11.033

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aben, A., De Wilde, L., Hollevoet, N., Henriquez, C., Vandeweerdt, M., Ponnet, K., & Van Tongel, A.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University Hospital (BE)
  • Ghent University (BE)
Venue
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
387-392
ISSN
1058-2746 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790936907
Cited by
55
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Keywords
lateral epicondylitis, psychological factors, Big Five personality traits, perfectionism, anxiety, depression, job satisfaction, working conditions, workload, employee autonomy, sex differences, wrist extensors
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Belgium, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Tennis Elbow, Incidence, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review