The quality of group tacit knowledge
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The organizational knowledge creation theory proposes that new knowledge is created through processes of tacit and explicit conversion: socialization, externalization, combination, and internalization.
“The organizational knowledge creation theory proposes that the new knowledge is created through processes of tacit and explicit conversion: socialization, externalization, combination, and internalization (Erden, Von Krogh, & Nonaka, 2008;Nonaka, Toyama, & Konno, 2000;Nonaka, 1994).”
From Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory (2020) · cites this paper as Erden, Von Krogh, & Nonaka, 2008
Cites
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809 · see citing works
Self-citationToward a knowledge-based theory of the firm
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171110 · Cited by 16,157 · see citing works
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Kogut and Zander (1992) define ‘‘group know-how” as recipes of organizing such as Tayloristic methods or craft production.”
BackgroundExploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm
Szulanski, G. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171105 · Cited by 7,839 · see citing works
Theatrical improvisation: Lessons for organizations
Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2004) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840604042412 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory
Antunes, H. D. J. G., & Pinheiro, P. G. (2020) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2019.04.002 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
- Authors
- Erden, Z., von Krogh, G., & Nonaka, I.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Hitotsubashi University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Erden, Zeynep
- Venue
- The Journal of Strategic Information Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-18
- ISSN
- 0963-8687 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W347341541
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 48.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Strategic Information Systems (publishedVersion)
- Quality Engineering
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Keywords
- knowledge quality, organizational knowledge creation, knowledge creation theory, knowledge sharing, knowledge systems, managerial implications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review