Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 470

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Towards an information systems perspective and research agenda on crowdsourcing for innovation

Open access
Majchrzak, A., Malhotra, A.·2013·The Journal of Strategic Information Systems
DOI 10.1016/j.jsis.2013.07.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsis.2013.07.004

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 80 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Buecheler, T., Sieg, J.H., Füchslin, R.M., Pfeifer, R., 2010. Crowdsourcing, open innovation and collective intelligence in the scientific method: a research agenda and operational framework. In: Artificial life XII. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems, Odense, Denmark, pp. 19–23.
  2. Fuller, J., Hutter, K., Hautz, J., Matzler, K. forthcoming. Internal innovation communities: the influence of motives and barriers on employees’ participation intensity. Journal of Product Innovation Management.
  3. Huizingh, 2010, Open innovation: state of the art and future prospective, Technovation, 1
  4. Lindic, 2011, Deploying IT for organizational innovation, Internal Journal of Information Management, 31, 183
  5. Madsen, T., Woolley, J., Sarangee, K., 2012. Using Internet-based collaboration technologies for Innovation: crowdsourcing vs. expertsourcing. In: Academy of Management Annual Meeting, August, Boston. · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2012.14965abstract
  6. Majchrzak, A., Wagner, C., Yates, D.N., 2013b. Online supplement on wikis and knowledge management: the impact of shaping on knowledge reuse for organizational improvement with wikis, MIS Quarterly, online supplement. · DOI
  7. Wright, R.S., 2013. Thinking of running an open innovation context? Think again. In: MIT Technology Review, Wednesday, June 05.
  8. Ye, H., Kankanhalli, A., Huber, M., Bretschneider, U., Blohm, I., Gaswami, S., Leimeister, J., Krcmar, H., 2012. Collaboration and the quality of user generated ideas in online innovation communities. In: Annual Academy of Management Meetings, August, Boston. · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2012.16803abstract

Cited by

See all 470

Metadata

Authors
Majchrzak, A., & Malhotra, A.
Venue
The Journal of Strategic Information Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
257-268
ISSN
0963-8687 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jsis.2013.07.004
OpenAlex
W2090509708
Cited by
470
References
80
FWCI
45.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards an information systems perspective and research agenda on crowdsourcing for innovation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jsis.2013.07.004
The paper
Majchrzak, A., & Malhotra, A. (2013). Towards an information systems perspective and research agenda on crowdsourcing for innovation. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2013.07.004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.