Cited by 806Innovation and Knowledge ManagementInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationDigital Platforms and Economics

Digital Product Innovation Within Four Classes of Innovation Networks

Lyytinen, Kalle, Yoo, Youngjin, Boland Jr., Richard J.·2016·Information Systems Journal

Abstract

The increased digitization of organizational processes and products poses new challenges for understanding product innovation. It also opens new horizons for information systems research. We analyse how ongoing pervasive digitization of product innovation reshapes knowledge creation and sharing in innovation networks. We argue that advances in digital technologies (1) increase innovation network connectivity by reducing communication costs and increasing its reach and scope and (2) increase the speed and scope of digital convergence, which increases network knowledge heterogeneity and need for integration. These developments, in turn, stretch existing innovation networks by redistributing control and increasing the demand for knowledge coordination across time and space presenting novel challenges for knowledge creation, assimilation and integration. Based on this foundation, we distinguish four types of emerging innovation networks supported by digitalization: (1) project innovation networks; (2) clan innovation networks; (3) federated innovation networks; and (4) anarchic innovation networks. Each network involves different cognitive and social translations – or ways of identifying, sharing and assimilating knowledge. We describe the role of five novel properties of digital infrastructures in supporting each type of innovation network: representational flexibility, semantic coherence, temporal and spatial traceability, knowledge brokering and linguistic calibration. We iden…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/isj.12093

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Licences represent specific aspects of engagement; their creation is often purposeful, and they are subject to differing interpretations and action from project members.

    “As licences represent specific aspects of engagement, their creation is often purposeful, and they are subject to differing interpretations and action from project members (Lyytinen et al. 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y., & Boland Jr., R. J.
Affiliations
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • Temple University (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University Cleveland OH USA
Corresponding author
Lyytinen, Kalle
Venue
Information Systems Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-10-28
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
47-75
ISSN
  • 1350-1917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2575
OpenAlex
W1866991274
Cited by
806
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 82 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 132 · 2023: 147 · 2022: 108 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
49.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Information Systems Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (062126)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
Keywords
digital product innovation, innovation networks, knowledge production, knowledge sharing, digital convergence, network connectivity, knowledge heterogeneity, knowledge integration, knowledge brokering, digital infrastructure, modularization, knowledge coordination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review