Digital Product Innovation Within Four Classes of Innovation Networks
Abstract
The increased digitization of organizational processes and products poses new challenges for understanding product innovation. It also opens new horizons for information systems research. We analyse how ongoing pervasive digitization of product innovation reshapes knowledge creation and sharing in innovation networks. We argue that advances in digital technologies (1) increase innovation network connectivity by reducing communication costs and increasing its reach and scope and (2) increase the speed and scope of digital convergence, which increases network knowledge heterogeneity and need for integration. These developments, in turn, stretch existing innovation networks by redistributing control and increasing the demand for knowledge coordination across time and space presenting novel challenges for knowledge creation, assimilation and integration. Based on this foundation, we distinguish four types of emerging innovation networks supported by digitalization: (1) project innovation networks; (2) clan innovation networks; (3) federated innovation networks; and (4) anarchic innovation networks. Each network involves different cognitive and social translations – or ways of identifying, sharing and assimilating knowledge. We describe the role of five novel properties of digital infrastructures in supporting each type of innovation network: representational flexibility, semantic coherence, temporal and spatial traceability, knowledge brokering and linguistic calibration. We iden…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Licences represent specific aspects of engagement; their creation is often purposeful, and they are subject to differing interpretations and action from project members.
“As licences represent specific aspects of engagement, their creation is often purposeful, and they are subject to differing interpretations and action from project members (Lyytinen et al. 2016).”
From Freeriding and Rebellion: An Investigation of Open Source Vendor Relicensing and Member Hard Forking Events (2026) · cites this paper as Lyytinen et al. 2016
Cites
Hutchins, E. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001 · Cited by 10,801 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Social translations are also involved in the interactions between people and artefacts during innovation (Hutchins, 1995).”
BackgroundBurt, R. S. (1992) · doi:10.4159/9780674029095 · Cited by 9,093 · see citing works
The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits
Hansen, M. T. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667032 · Cited by 5,809 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The four types of networks we will unpack are signi fi cant sources of digital product innovation (Hansen, 1999; Powell et al ., 2005; Uzzi & Spiro, 2005), which rarely emerge from the linear development of a single idea into a new product.”
BackgroundSteps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces
Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.7.1.111 · Cited by 3,238 · see citing works
Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem
Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. (2005) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/432782 · Cited by 1,885 · see citing works
Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing
Attewell, P. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.1.1 · Cited by 1,401 · see citing works
The power of gifts: organizing social relationships in open source communities
Bergquist, M., & Ljungberg, J. (2001) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2575.2001.00111.x · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Bailey, D. E., Leonardi, P. M., & Barley, S. R. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0703 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Challenges and Opportunities in the Digitalization of Companies in a Post-COVID-19 World
Almeida, F., Duarte Santos, J., & Augusto Monteiro, J. (2020) · IEEE Engineering Management Review · doi:10.1109/emr.2020.3013206 · Cited by 520 · see citing works
Khurana, I., Dutta, D. K., & Singh Ghura, A. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.048 · Cited by 443 · see citing works
Heredia, J., Castillo-Vergara, M., Geldes, C., Carbajal Gamarra, F. M., Flores, A., & Heredia, W. (2022) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2022.100171 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Sandberg, J., Holmström, J., & Lyytinen, K. (2020) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2020/14520 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Self-citationQinqin, W., Qalati, S. A., Hussain, R. Y., Irshad, H., Tajeddini, K., Siddique, F., & Gamage, T. C. (2023) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2023.100415 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Foster, D., & Germonprez, M. (2026) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.70060
- Authors
- Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y., & Boland Jr., R. J.
- Affiliations
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Temple University (US)
- Case Western Reserve University Cleveland OH USA
- Corresponding author
- Lyytinen, Kalle
- Venue
- Information Systems Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-10-28
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-75
- ISSN
- 1350-1917 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2575
- OpenAlex
- W1866991274
- Cited by
- 806
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 82 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 132 · 2023: 147 · 2022: 108 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 49.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Information Systems Journal (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (062126)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Keywords
- digital product innovation, innovation networks, knowledge production, knowledge sharing, digital convergence, network connectivity, knowledge heterogeneity, knowledge integration, knowledge brokering, digital infrastructure, modularization, knowledge coordination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review