The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 18,397
The concept of activity in Soviet psychology
(2002) · An Introduction to Vygotsky · doi:10.4324/9780203434185-9 · Cited by 2,114
Feedback on second language students' writing
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444806003399 · Cited by 1,016
Error feedback in L2 writing classes
Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(01)00039-x · Cited by 981
The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to truscott (1996)
Ferris, D. (1999) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80110-6 · Cited by 854
Zamel, V. (1985) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586773 · Cited by 763 · cited 6×
“It is recommended that teachers give clear, concrete and text-specific comments, including both praise and constructive criticism (Goldstein, 2004; Hyland & Hyland, 2001; Zamel, 1985), but more importantly do so through engaging with students and building relationships with them, giving helpful intervention to avoid a…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe Problem of Activity in Psychology
Leont'ev, A. N. (1974) · Soviet Psychology · doi:10.2753/rpo1061-040513024 · Cited by 663
(2002) · Cited by 661
Second Language Writing. Research Insights for the Classroom.
Kroll, B. (1990) · Modern Language Journal · Cited by 656
The influence of teacher commentary on student revision
Ferris, D. R. (1997) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588049 · Cited by 618 · cited 2×
“In Ferris’ (1997) study, for example, it was found that 15% of teachers’ comments focused on grammar and mechanics, while 85% addressed students’ ideas and rhetorical development (Ferris, 1997; Ferris, Pezone, Tade, & Tinti, 1997).”
Background
Cited by
Classroom Writing Assessment and Feedback in L2 School Contexts
Lee, I. (2017) · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3924-9 · Cited by 386
Self-citationFaculty feedback: Perceptions and practices in L2 disciplinary writing
Hyland, K. (2013) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.003 · Cited by 184
Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing studies
Ferris, D. R. (2012) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444812000250 · Cited by 108
An analysis of Chinese EFL students’ use of first and second language in peer feedback of L2 writing
Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2014) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.08.007 · Cited by 100
Self-citationThe grass is not always greener: Teacher vs. GPT-assisted written corrective feedback
Lin, S., & Crosthwaite, P. (2024) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2024.103529 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Second Language Writing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 69-85
- ISSN
- 1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081704516
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 35.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.10.001
- The paper
- Lee, I. (2008). Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.10.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
