Cited by 278EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningStudent Assessment and Feedback

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article

Open access

Shintani, Natsuko, Ellis, Rod·2013·Journal of Second Language Writing

DOI 10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.011

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.011

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition
Higgs, T. V., & Krashen, S. D. (1983) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328293 · Cited by 5,375
Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning
Bernhardt, E. B., & Krashen, S. D. (1989) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/326882 · Cited by 4,605
Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition
Krahnke, K. J., & Krashen, S. D. (1983) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586656 · Cited by 4,483
The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition
Long, M. H. (1996) · Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1016/b978-012589042-7/50015-3 · Cited by 3,927
Untitled work
(1998) · Cited by 2,572
Second language acquisition and second language learning
Sang, F. (1983) · System · doi:10.1016/0346-251x(83)90013-1 · Cited by 2,177
The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes
Truscott, J. (1996) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x · Cited by 1,874
Cognition and Second Language Instruction
Robinson, P. J. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524780 · Cited by 1,776

Show all 62 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

Anderson, T. (2010). The effect of tiered corrective feedback on second language academic writing. Master of Arts thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver. Retrieved from http://circle.ubc.ca.
Mohamed, N. (2001). Teaching grammar through consciousness-raising tasks. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland.

Sorted by citations

The Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in Improving L2 Written Accuracy: A Meta‐Analysis
Kang, E., & Han, Z. (2015) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12189 · Cited by 385
Effects of Written Feedback and Revision on Learners’ Accuracy in Using Two English Grammatical Structures
Shintani, N., Ellis, R., & Suzuki, W. (2013) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12029 · Cited by 260
Self-citation
Twenty-five years of research on oral and written corrective feedback in System
Li, S., & Vuono, A. (2019) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2019.05.006 · Cited by 271
L2 student engagement with automated feedback on writing: Potential for learning and issues of trust
Ranalli, J. (2021) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100816 · Cited by 184
The revision and transfer effects of direct and indirect comprehensive corrective feedback on ESL students’ writing
Karim, K., & Nassaji, H. (2018) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168818802469 · Cited by 205
Investigating written corrective feedback: (Mis)alignment of teachers’ beliefs and practice
Mao, S. S., & Crosthwaite, P. R. (2019) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2019.05.004 · Cited by 157
The Effectiveness of Synchronous and Asynchronous Written Corrective Feedback on Grammatical Accuracy in a Computer‐Mediated Environment
Shintani, N., & Aubrey, S. (2016) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12317 · Cited by 147
Self-citation
“I just want to do it right, but it's so hard”: A novice teacher's written feedback beliefs and practices
Junqueira, L., & Payant, C. (2014) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2014.11.001 · Cited by 121
The effects of feedback explicitness and type of target structure on accuracy in revision and new pieces of writing
Suzuki, W., Nassaji, H., & Sato, K. (2019) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2018.12.017 · Cited by 114
Effects of written corrective feedback and language aptitude on verb tense accuracy
Benson, S. D., & Dekeyser, R. (2019) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168818770921 · Cited by 111
Direct Written Corrective Feedback, Learner Differences, and the Acquisition of Second Language Article Use for Generic and Specific Plural Reference
Stefanou, C., & Révész, A. (2015) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12212 · Cited by 106
Feedback scope in written corrective feedback: Analysis of empirical research in L2 contexts
Mao, Z., & Lee, I. (2020) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100469 · Cited by 123
Does language analytical ability mediate the effect of written feedback on grammatical accuracy in second language writing?
Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2015) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.01.006 · Cited by 89
Self-citation
Second language writing development: A research agenda
Polio, C. G. (2017) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444817000015 · Cited by 76
The Differential Effects of Comprehensive Feedback Forms in the Second Language Writing Class
López, M. B., Steendam, E. V., Speelman, D., & Buyse, K. (2018) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12295 · Cited by 85
Task repetition, synchronous written corrective feedback and the learning of Korean grammar: A classroom-based study
Kim, Y., Choi, B., Yun, H., Kim, B., & Choi, S. (2020) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168820912354 · Cited by 44
The measurement of implicit and explicit knowledge
Ellis, R., & Roever, C. (2018) · Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2018.1504229 · Cited by 90
Self-citation
Learner engagement with written corrective feedback in ESL and EFL contexts: a qualitative research synthesis using a perception-based framework
Shen, R., & Chong, S. W. (2022) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2072468 · Cited by 107
The effects of written corrective feedback
Karim, K., & Nassaji, H. (2019) · Instructed Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1558/isla.37949 · Cited by 74
The Effects of ChatGPT-Generated Feedback on Saudi EFL Learners’ Writing Skills and Perception at the Tertiary Level: A Mixed-Methods Study
Alsofyani, A. H., & Barzanji, A. M. (2024) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331241307297 · Cited by 108
Perspectives on Using Automated Writing Evaluation Systems to Provide Written Corrective Feedback in the ESL Classroom
Woodworth, J., & Barkaoui, K. (2020) · TESL Canada Journal · doi:10.18806/tesl.v37i2.1340 · Cited by 60
Understanding the impact of teacher feedback on EFL students’ use of self-regulated writing strategies
Yang, L., Zhang, L. J., & Dixon, H. R. (2023) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101015 · Cited by 74
The Intersection between SLA and Feedback Research
Bitchener, J. (2019) · Feedback in Second Language Writing · doi:10.1017/9781108635547.007 · Cited by 57
The role of task repetition with direct written corrective feedback in L2 writing complexity, accuracy and fluency
Khezrlou, S. (2020) · Journal of Second Language Studies · doi:10.1075/jsls.19025.khe · Cited by 46
Understanding student engagement with teacher and peer feedback in L2 writing
Cheng, X., Liu, Y., & Wang, C. (2023) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2023.103176 · Cited by 78
Comparing L1 and L2 Texts and Writers in First‐Year Composition
Eckstein, G., & Ferris, D. R. (2017) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.376 · Cited by 57
Effects of teacher-scaffolded and self-scaffolded corrective feedback compared to direct corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy in English L2 writing
Boggs, J. A. (2019) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100671 · Cited by 69
Effectiveness of written corrective feedback in developing L2 accuracy: A Bayesian meta-analysis
Brown, D., Liu, Q., & Norouzian, R. (2023) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688221147374 · Cited by 85
EFL Students' Preferences for Written Corrective Feedback: Do Error Types, Language Proficiency, and Foreign Language Enjoyment Matter?
Zhang, T., Chen, X., Hu, J., & Ketwan, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660564 · Cited by 51
“WCF is inevitably explicit in nature (Shintani and Ellis, 2013) to function as a noticing facilitator; however, the degree of explicitness of WCF affects the noticing of it.”
Background
L2 writing-to-learn
Leow, R. P. (2020) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.56.05leo · Cited by 50
The relative effects of metalinguistic explanation and direct written corrective feedback on children’s grammatical accuracy in new writing
Gorman, M., & Ellis, R. (2019) · Language Teaching for Young Learners · doi:10.1075/ltyl.00005.gor · Cited by 48
Self-citation
Language Learning Through Writing: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Evidence
Manchón, R. M., & Vasylets, O. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108333603.015 · Cited by 48
The distinctive nature of task repetition in writing: implications for theory, research and pedagogy
Manchón, R. M. (2014) · Elia · doi:10.12795/elia.2014.i14.02 · Cited by 40
Teachers’ attempts at focused written corrective feedback in situ
Lee, I., Luo, N., & Mak, P. (2021) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100809 · Cited by 47
Sustaining University English as a Foreign Language Learners’ Writing Performance through Provision of Comprehensive Written Corrective Feedback
Cheng, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13158192 · Cited by 46
Assessing the effectiveness of interactional feedback for L2 acquisition: Issues and challenges
Nassaji, H. (2020) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444819000375 · Cited by 53
Written Corrective Feedback Strategies Employed by University English Lecturers: A Teacher Cognition Perspective
Wei, W., & Cao, Y. K. (2020) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244020934886 · Cited by 56
The effect of a digital game-based learning task on the acquisition of the English Article System
Kao, C.-W. (2020) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2020.102373 · Cited by 52
The Effect of Unfocused Direct and Indirect Written Corrective Feedback on Rewritten Texts and New Texts: Looking into Feedback for Accuracy and Feedback for Acquisition
Nicolás‐Conesa, F., Manchón, R. M., & García, M. L. C. (2019) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12592 · Cited by 42
The effect of highly focused versus mid-focused written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge development
Zhang, T. (2021) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2021.102493 · Cited by 49
Meta-analysis of second language research with complex research designs
Norouzian, R., & Bui, G. (2023) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263123000311 · Cited by 38
Eye-tracking in recent L2 learner process research: A review of areas, issues, and methodological approaches
Latif, M. M. M. A. (2019) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2019.02.008 · Cited by 39
Promoting student engagement with teacher feedback through rebuttal writing
Man, D., Chau, M. H., & Bei-bei, K. (2020) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2020.1746238 · Cited by 37
To what extent has the published written CF research aided our understanding of its potential for L2 development?
Bitchener, J. (2016) · ITL Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1075/itl.167.2.01bit · Cited by 34
Three Paradigms of Classroom Assessment: Implications for Written Feedback Research
Chong, S. W. (2017) · Language Assessment Quarterly · doi:10.1080/15434303.2017.1405423 · Cited by 41
ESL learners’ perception and its relationship with the efficacy of written corrective feedback
Sinha, T. S., & Nassaji, H. (2021) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.12378 · Cited by 37
Does asking learners to revise add to the effect of written corrective feedback on L2 acquisition?
Ekanayaka, W. I., & Ellis, R. (2020) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2020.102341 · Cited by 31
Self-citation
Improving reference cohesion in young EFL learners’ collaboratively written narratives: Is there a role for reformulation?
Coyle, Y., Mora, P. A. F., & Becerra, J. A. S. (2020) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2020.102333 · Cited by 30
Students’ engagement across a typology of teacher feedback practices
Tay, H. Y., & Lam, K. (2022) · Educational Research for Policy and Practice · doi:10.1007/s10671-022-09315-2 · Cited by 28
A Bayesian Approach to Measuring Evidence in L2 Research: An Empirical Investigation
Norouzian, R., de Miranda, M., & Plonsky, L. (2019) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12543 · Cited by 33
A systematic review of written corrective feedback research in ESL/EFL contexts
Chong, S. W. (2019) · Language Education & Assessment · doi:10.29140/lea.v2n2.138 · Cited by 38
Written Corrective Feedback
Bitchener, J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108589789.011 · Cited by 27
SAMPLE SIZE PLANNING IN QUANTITATIVE L2 RESEARCH
Norouzian, R. (2020) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263120000017 · Cited by 27
Assessing the effect of focused direct and focused indirect written corrective feedback on explicit and implicit knowledge of language learners
Nemati, M., Alavi, S. M., & Mohebbi, H. (2019) · Language Testing in Asia · doi:10.1186/s40468-019-0084-9 · Cited by 25
Comprehensive corrective feedback on low and high proficiency writers
López, M. B., Steendam, E. V., & Buyse, K. (2017) · ITL Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1075/itl.168.1.04bon · Cited by 25
Effects of Metalinguistic Explanation and Direct Correction on EFL Learners’ Linguistic Accuracy
Guo, Q., & Barrot, J. S. (2019) · Reading & Writing Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10573569.2018.1540320 · Cited by 25
Teachers Helping EFL Students Improve Their Writing Through Written Feedback: The Case of Native and Non-native English-Speaking Teachers' Beliefs
Cheng, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.804313 · Cited by 36
The Effect of Six Different Corrective Feedback Strategies on Iranian English Language Learners’ IELTS Writing Task 2
Sanavi, R. V., & Nemati, M. (2014) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244014538271 · Cited by 23
L2 writing scholarship in JSLW: An updated report of research published between 1992 and 2015
Pelaez-Morales, C. (2017) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2017.09.001 · Cited by 23
THE EFFECTS OF THE TIMING OF ISOLATED FFI ON THE EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE AND WRITTEN ACCURACY OF LEARNERS WITH DIFFERENT PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF THE LINGUISTIC TARGET
Shintani, N. (2016) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263116000127 · Cited by 28
Self-citation
ChatGPT-generated versus human direct corrective feedback on L2 writing
Muñoz Muñoz, B. C., Nassaji, H., & Bello Carrillo, F. I. (2025) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2025.103805 · Cited by 22
Direct Written Corrective Feedback with Metalinguistic Explanation: Investigating Language Analytic Ability
(2021) · doi:10.30466/ijltr.2021.120976 · Cited by 19
The effects of symmetric and asymmetric social networks on second language communication
Paul, J. Z., & Friginal, E. (2019) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1527364 · Cited by 24
WCF processing in the L2 curriculum: A look at type of WCF, type of linguistic item, and L2 performance
Leow, R. P., Thinglum, A., & Leow, S. A. (2022) · Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.4.6 · Cited by 20
Instructor feedback on free writing and automated corrective feedback in drills: Intensity and efficacy
Gao, J., & Ma, S. (2020) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168820915337 · Cited by 18
The Effects of Pre‐Task and Post‐Task Metalinguistic Explanations on Accuracy in Second Language Writing
Shintani, N., Aubrey, S., & Donnellan, M. (2016) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.323 · Cited by 21
Self-citation
WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN WRITING INSTRUCTION: A QUALITATIVE SYNTHESIS OF RECENT RESEARCH
Pei Fen Dawn, S. I. A., & Cheung, Y. L. (2017) · Issues in Language Studies · doi:10.33736/ils.478.2017 · Cited by 18
The effect of indirect written corrective feedback on students’ writing accuracy
Shirotha, F. B. (2016) · Journal on English as a Foreign Language · doi:10.23971/jefl.v6i2.401 · Cited by 16
Effectiveness of teachers' direct and indirect written corrective feedback provision strategies on enhancing students’ writing achievement: Ethiopian university entrants in focus
Wondim, B. M., Bishaw, K. S., & Teklesellassie, Y. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24279 · Cited by 16
Investigating novice EFL writing teachers’ beliefs and practices concerning written corrective feedback across contexts: a case study from a complexity theory perspective
Chen, W. (2022) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658416.2022.2119993 · Cited by 16
Determiner Use in English Quantificational Expressions: A Corpus‐Based Study
Yoo, I. W., & Shin, Y. K. (2019) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.539 · Cited by 16
Feedback, Response, and Learner Development: A Sociocultural Approach to Corrective Feedback in Second Language Writing
Zhang, X., & Zhang, R. (2023) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440231157680 · Cited by 25
Task-specific writing anxiety and self-efficacy are separate from general L2 writing anxiety and self-efficacy and they have differential associations with the effects of written corrective feedback in pre-task and within-task planning
An, H., & Li, S. (2024) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2024.103480 · Cited by 19
Greater coverage vs. deeper processing? Comparing individual and collaborative processing of teacher feedback
Peng, C. X., Storch, N., & Knoch, U. (2023) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688231214910 · Cited by 16
Activity Theory in Spanish Mixed Classrooms: Exploring Corrective Feedback as an Artifact
Valentín‐Rivera, L. (2016) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/flan.12206 · Cited by 14
Macao Secondary School EFL Teachers’ Perspectives on Written Corrective Feedback: Rationales and Constraints
Hong, W. C. H. (2021) · Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation · doi:10.61414/jeti.v1i1.17 · Cited by 15
The Effect of Written Corrective Feedback on Omani Students’ Accuracy in the Use of English Prepositions
Ajmi, A. A. S. A. (2015) · Advances in Language and Literary Studies · doi:10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.1p.61 · Cited by 13
Interpersonal aspect of written feedback: a community college students’ perspective
Chong, S. W. (2018) · Research in Post-Compulsory Education · doi:10.1080/13596748.2018.1526906 · Cited by 14
Adapting Levels 1 and 2 of Kirkpatrick’s model of training evaluation to examine the effectiveness of a tertiary-level writing course
Aryadoust, V. (2016) · Pedagogies An International Journal · doi:10.1080/1554480x.2016.1242426 · Cited by 13
Written Corrective Feedback as Practiced by Instructors of Writing in English at Najran University
Aseeri, F. M. M. (2019) · Journal of Education and Learning · doi:10.5539/jel.v8n3p112 · Cited by 13
The Effects of Two Forms of Written Corrective Feedback and Ambiguity Tolerance on EFL Learners’ Writing Accuracy
Bagheri, M., & Rassaei, E. (2021) · English Teaching & Learning · doi:10.1007/s42321-021-00082-6 · Cited by 12
The interplay between corrective feedback timing and foreign language anxiety in L2 development
Rassaei, E. (2023) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688231195141 · Cited by 19
Written corrective feedback, learner-internal cognitive processes, and the acquisition of regular past tense by Chinese L2 learners of English
Shao, J., & Liu, Y. (2020) · Applied Linguistics Review · doi:10.1515/applirev-2019-0131 · Cited by 13
Intelligent Computer Assisted Language Learning (ICALL) for nêhiyawêwin: An In-Depth User-Experience Evaluation
Bontogon, M., Arppe, A., Antonsen, L., Thunder, D., & Lachler, J. (2018) · Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes · doi:10.3138/cmlr.4054 · Cited by 12
The relative efficacy of input enhancement, input flooding, and output-based instructional approaches in the acquisition of L2 request modifiers
Ajabshir, Z. F. (2020) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168819896655 · Cited by 12
The Effect of Comprehensive Written Corrective Feedback on EFL Learners’ Written Syntactic Complexity
Valızadeh, M. (2022) · Journal of language and Education · doi:10.17323/jle.2022.12052 · Cited by 12
The effectiveness of direct and indirect written corrective feedback in improving the grammatical accuracy of Omani EFL learners
Harrasi, A., & Mohammed, S. N. (2019) · Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) · Cited by 12
The future of written corrective feedback research
Lee, I. (2024) · Pedagogies An International Journal · doi:10.1080/1554480x.2024.2388068 · Cited by 11
AI-assisted feedback in CLIL courses as a self-regulated language learning mechanism: students’ perceptions and experiences
Campos, M. (2025) · European Public & Social Innovation Review · doi:10.31637/epsir-2025-1568 · Cited by 27
Student engagement with computermediated teacher written corrective feedback: A case study
Koltovskaia, S., & Mahapatra, S. K. (2022) · The JALT CALL Journal · doi:10.29140/jaltcall.v18n2.519 · Cited by 13
Learning to improve grammar instruction through comprehensive analysis of past research
Schenck, A. D. (2017) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2015-0038 · Cited by 13
The Effect of Sustained Teacher Feedback on CAF, Content and Organization in EFL Writing
Rastgou, A., Storch, N., & Knoch, U. (2020) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.30466/ijltr.2020.120888 · Cited by 14
L2 Learners’ Engagement with Direct Written Corrective Feedback in First- Year Composition Courses
Uscinski, I. (2017) · ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) · Cited by 10
Medical School Students’ Preferences for and Perceptions of Teacher Written Corrective Feedback on English as a Second Language Academic Writing: An Intrinsic Case Study
Reynolds, B. L., & Zhang, X. (2022) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs13010013 · Cited by 9
Using meta-analysis of technique and timing to optimize corrective feedback for specific grammatical features
Schenck, A. D. (2020) · Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education · doi:10.1186/s40862-020-00097-9 · Cited by 15
Learning Korean honorifics through individual and collaborative writing tasks and written corrective feedback
Cho, H., & Kim, Y. (2019) · Applied Linguistics Review · doi:10.1515/applirev-2018-0075 · Cited by 10
Enhancing Syntactic Complexity in L2 Chinese Writing: Effects of Form-Focused Instruction on the Chinese Topic Chain
Zhou, J., & Lü, C. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.843789 · Cited by 9
Reconsidering Teacher, Peer, and Computer‐Generated Feedback
Chong, I. (2017) · TESOL Journal · doi:10.1002/tesj.334 · Cited by 14
Error logs in the second language classroom: Exploring the relationship between learner engagement with written corrective feedback and improvements in writing accuracy
Lau, W. M. E., Aubrey, S., & Ellis, R. (2024) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2024.103329 · Cited by 11
Self-citation
Incorporating ChatGPT as an automated written corrective feedback tool into L2 writing class
Zhang, Y. (2024) · Journal of Language Teaching · doi:10.54475/jlt.2024.024 · Cited by 13

Authors: Shintani, N., & Ellis, R.
Affiliations: Nanyang Technological University (SG)
University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author: Shintani, Natsuko
ORCID: Shintani, Natsuko
Ellis, Rod
Venue: Journal of Second Language Writing
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2013-09
Volume: 22
Issue: 3
Pages: 286-306
ISSN: 1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.011
OpenAlex: W2002091368
Cited by: 278
References: 62
Citations by year: 2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI: 83.67
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
hdl.handle.net
Locations: Journal of Second Language Writing (publishedVersion)
eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Funders: Michigan State University
College of Engineering, Michigan State University
Topics: Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords: written corrective feedback, metalinguistic explanation, explicit knowledge, tacit knowledge, ESL learners, second language writing, error correction, eye tracking, self-monitoring, rule awareness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks