The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The assessment of school engagement: Examining dimensionality and measurement invariance by gender and race/ethnicity
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723327 · Cited by 26,163
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
Structural Equations with Latent Variables.
Clogg, C. C., & Bollen, K. A. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2072165 · Cited by 17,442
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Lahiff, M., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289883 · Cited by 17,265
Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5 · Cited by 16,280
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424 · Cited by 12,298
EQS : structural equations program manual
Bentler, P. M. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 9,669
Cited by
Wang, M.-T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002 · Cited by 833
Self-citationWang, M., & Eccles, J. S. (2012) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00753.x · Cited by 667
Self-citationDevelopment of Achievement Motivation and Engagement
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Fredricks, J. A., Simpkins, S., Roeser, R. W., & Schiefele, U. (2015) · Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science · doi:10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy316 · Cited by 646
Self-citationKorpershoek, H., Canrinus, E. T., Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., & de Boer, H. (2020) · Research Papers in Education · doi:10.1080/02671522.2019.1615116 · Cited by 648
“The often referred to review study of Fredricks et al. (2004) distinguishes three domains, namely between behavioural, emotional, and cognitive engagement (see also Finn and Zimmer 2012; Furlong et al. 2003; Lawson and Lawson 2013; Wang, Willett, and Eccles 2011).”
BackgroundThe Math and Science Engagement Scales: Scale development, validation, and psychometric properties
Wang, M.-T., Fredricks, J. A., Ye, F., Hofkens, T. L., & Linn, J. S. (2016) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.008 · Cited by 592
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, M.-T., Willett, J. B., & Eccles, J. S.
- Venue
- Journal of School Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 465-480
- ISSN
- 0022-4405 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2094009871
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 21.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The assessment of school engagement: Examining dimensionality and measurement invariance by gender and race/ethnicity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.04.001
- The paper
- Wang, M.-T., Willett, J. B., & Eccles, J. S. (2011). The assessment of school engagement: Examining dimensionality and measurement invariance by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of School Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.04.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
