Academic grit scale: psychometric properties and associations with achievement and life satisfaction
Abstract
After a decade of research, grit has been linked to many adaptive outcomes for adolescents and the development of school-based interventions for promoting adolescents' grit has been recommended. However, a reconceptualization of grit and its measurement may be vital for future grit research and application. The currently predominant grit assessments may be inappropriate for youth populations, yielding evidence of low psychometric properties and variable criterion-related validity. In a sample of adolescents (N = 757) in sixth to eighth grade, the current study investigated the psychometric properties of the Academic Grit Scale, a novel measure of domain-specific grit. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed a single-factor structure of the Academic Grit Scale, and evidence of high internal consistency reliability and construct validity was observed. Results indicated positive associations between academic grit and academic achievement, life satisfaction, and school satisfaction. Furthermore, academic grit demonstrated incremental validity above and beyond that of general grit in association with these outcomes. Implications of the findings are discussed, including the potential to inform applied practices in schools and future empirical investigations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Grit is malleable and can be enhanced through intervention and instruction in the instructional context.
“An outstanding feature of grit is its malleability, which means that it can be enhanced through intervention and instruction in the instructional context (Clark and Malecki, 2019).”
From Researching and Practicing Positive Psychology in Second/Foreign Language Learning and Teaching: The Past, Current Status and Future Directions (2021) · cites this paper as Clark and Malecki, 2019
Cites
Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087 · Cited by 6,911 · see citing works
Identifying careless responses in survey data.
Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0028085 · Cited by 3,865 · see citing works
Development and validation of the short grit scale (grit-s)
Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223890802634290 · Cited by 3,376 · see citing works
Handbook of Research on Student Engagement
(2012) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7 · Cited by 3,050 · see citing works
Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature
Credé, M., Tynan, M. C., & Harms, P. D. (2017) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000102 · Cited by 1,653 · see citing works
Initial development of the student's life satisfaction scale
Huebner, E. S. (1991) · School Psychology International · doi:10.1177/0143034391123010 · Cited by 1,101 · see citing works
Looking beyond psychopathology: The dual-factor model of mental health in youth
Suldo, S. M., & Shaffer, E. J. (2008) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.2008.12087908 · Cited by 997 · see citing works
Toward an Understanding of Definitions and Measures of School Engagement and Related Terms
Jimerson, S. R., Campos, E., & Greif, J. L. (2003) · The California School Psychologist · doi:10.1007/bf03340893 · Cited by 811 · see citing works
Guerrero, L. R., Dudovitz, R., Chung, P. J., Dosanjh, K. K., & Wong, M. D. (2016) · Academic Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.acap.2015.12.016 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, Y., Derakhshan, A., & Zhang, L. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731721 · Cited by 762 · see citing works
“An outstanding feature of grit is its malleability, which means that it can be enhanced through intervention and instruction in the instructional context (Clark and Malecki, 2019).”
BackgroundSouthon, C. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.958013 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Clark, K. N., & Malecki, C. K.
- Affiliations
- Northern Illinois University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Clark, Kelly N.
- Venue
- Journal of School Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 72
- Pages
- 49-66
- ISSN
- 0022-4405 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2907501194
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 52 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8
- FWCI
- 26.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of School Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- grit, adolescents, psychometric properties, academic performance, life satisfaction, school satisfaction, incremental validity, construct validity, factor structure, junior high school students
- MeSH terms
- Achievement, Adolescent, Child, Female, Goals, Humans, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Personality, Psychometrics, Schools, Students, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review