Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The use of supervisory practices as leverage to improve safety behavior: A cross-level intervention model

Zohar, Dov, Luria, Gil·2003·Journal of Safety Research

Abstract

Introduction The paper presents three intervention studies designed to modify supervisory monitoring and rewarding of subordinates' safety performance. Method Line supervisors received weekly feedback concerning the frequency of their safety-oriented interactions with subordinates, and used this to self-monitor progress toward designated improvement goals. Managers higher up in the organizational hierarchy received the same information, coupled with synchronous data concerning the frequency of workers' safety behaviors, and highlighting co-variation of supervisory action and workers' behavior. Results In all the companies involved, supervisory safety-oriented interaction increased significantly, resulting in significant changes in workers' safety behavior and safety climate scores. Continued improvement during the post-intervention period suggests the inclusion of workers' safety behavior as in-role supervisory responsibility. Applied and theoretical implications are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsr.2003.05.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cost-benefit analysis for high-risk industries of value adding to workers' safety knowledge, behaviour change and risk perceptions is crucial to risk mitigation and often mandatory.

    “The cost-benefit analysis for these industries of ‘value adding’ to workers (especially inexperienced) safety knowledge, behaviour change and risk perceptions is crucial to risk mitigation and often mandatory [135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142].”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Alliger, 1993, Using signal-contingent experience sampling methodology to study work in the field, Personnel Psychology, 46, 525, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00883.x · DOI
  2. Barling, 2002, Development and test of a model linking transformational leadership and occupational safety, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 488, 10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.488 · DOI
  3. Barron, G., & Erev, I. (in press). Small feedback-based decisions and their limited correspondence to description based decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. · DOI
  4. Cacioppe, 1998, An integrated model and approach for the design of effective leadership development programs, Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 19, 44, 10.1108/01437739810368820 · DOI
  5. Dansereau, 1995, Leadership: The multiple-level approaches, Leadership Quarterly, 6, 251, 10.1016/1048-9843(95)90009-8 · DOI
  6. Erev, 1998, Signal detection by human observers: A cutoff reinforcement learning model of categorization decisions under uncertainty, Psychological Review, 105, 280, 10.1037/0033-295X.105.2.280 · DOI
  7. Fahlbruch, 1999, System safety: An emerging field for I/O psychology, vol. 14, 55
  8. Heath, 2001, Big-B versus Big-O: What is organizational about organizational behavior?, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 43, 10.1002/job.77 · DOI
  9. Herrnstein, 1993, Utility maximization and melioration: Internalities in individual choice, Journal of Behavior and Decision Making, 6, 149, 10.1002/bdm.3960060302 · DOI
  10. Hofmann, 1999, Safety-related behavior as a social exchange: The role of perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange, Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 286, 10.1037/0021-9010.84.2.286 · DOI
  11. House, 1995, The meso paradigm: A framework for the integration of micro and macro organizational behavior, Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, 71
  12. Klein, 1994, Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis, Academy of Management Review, 19, 195, 10.5465/amr.1994.9410210745 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Lingard, 1997, Behavior-based safety management in Hong Kong's construction industry, Journal of Safety Research, 28, 243, 10.1016/S0022-4375(97)00010-8 · DOI
  14. McAfee, 1989, The use of incentives/feedback to enhance workplace safety: A critique of the literature, Journal of Safety Research, 20, 7, 10.1016/0022-4375(89)90003-0 · DOI
  15. Morgeson, 1999, The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development, Academy of Management Review, 24, 249, 10.5465/amr.1999.1893935 · DOI
  16. O'Hara, 1985, Organizational behavior management in the private sector: A review of empirical research, Academy of Management Review, 10, 848, 10.5465/amr.1985.4279107 · DOI
  17. Pate-Cornell, 1990, Organizational aspects of engineering system safety: The case of offshore platforms, Science, 250, 1210, 10.1126/science.250.4985.1210 · DOI
  18. Rousseau, 2001, Location, location, location: Contextualizing organizational research, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 1, 10.1002/job.78 · DOI
  19. Schneider, 1983, On the etiology of climates, Personnel Psychology, 36, 19, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1983.tb00500.x · DOI
  20. Stajkovic, 1997, A meta-analysis of the effects of organizational behavior modification on task performance, 1975–95, Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1122, 10.2307/256929 · DOI
  21. Wright, 1986, Routine deaths: Fatal accidents in the oil industry, The Sociological Review, 34, 265, 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1986.tb02702.x · DOI
  22. Zohar, 1980, Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications, Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 96, 10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.96 · DOI
  23. Zohar, 2000, A group-level model of safety climate: Testing the effect of group climate on micro-accidents in manufacturing jobs, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 587, 10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.587 · DOI
  24. Zohar, 2002, Modifying supervisory practices to improve sub-unit safety: A leadership-based intervention model, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 156, 10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.156 · DOI
  25. Zohar, 2002, The effects of leadership dimensions, safety climate, and assigned priorities on minor injuries in work groups, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 75, 10.1002/job.130 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zohar, D., & Luria, G.
Venue
Journal of Safety Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-01
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
567-577
ISSN
0022-4375
Cited by
303
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review