Cited by 15Traffic and Road SafetyIoT and GPS-based Vehicle Safety SystemsHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety

French drivers’ behavior: Do psychological resources and vulnerabilities matter?

Open access
Karras, Marion, Delhomme, Patricia, Csillik, Antonia·2022·Journal of Safety Research

Abstract

Introduction Driving is a risky activity, and road users' behavior is one of the many factors that participate in increasing the risk of road-traffic crashes. Drivers must constantly adapt their behavior to the environment and control their vehicles, and must also anticipate the behavior of others, which may pose a threat to their own safety. Interactions between road users can therefore be stressful and elicit strong negative emotions. Psychological resources and vulnerabilities may be important in understanding how drivers perceive and respond to these driving interactions. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of empathy, self-compassion, personal distress, and alexithymia in both dangerous and prosocial driving behaviors. Method Our sample (N = 550) of French drivers was recruited via snowball sampling. The drivers filled in paper-and-pencil questionnaires including the Driver Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ), the French adaptation of the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (Short-FTEQ), the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), the Self-Compassion Scale - Short Form (SCS-SF), and the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20). Results After controlling for gender and age, regression analyses revealed that road traffic violations were positively predicted by alexithymia and negatively predicted by cognitive empathy; errors were positively predicted by alexithymia and personal distress, and prosocial driving was positively predicted by emotional and cognitive empathy. A two-step…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.12.005

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • General laborers often perform complex tasks and have a higher turn-over, which can make it challenging to implement regular safety measures and training.

    “Furthermore, general laborers often perform complex tasks and have a higher turn-over, which can make it challenging to implement regular safety measures and training (Liu et al. 2022).”
  • The diverse nature of general laborers' work may lead to situations where PPE is not suitable for all tasks or where risk mitigation strategies are not effectively tailored to their specific needs.

    “Moreover, the diverse nature of their work may lead to situations where PPE is not suitable for all tasks or where risk mitigation strategies are not effectively tailored to their specific needs (Liu et al. 2022).”
  • PPE alone is not sufficient without thorough safety procedures and training, as persons wearing PPE may engage in risky behaviors thinking that they are protected.

    “suggesting that PPE alone is not sufficient without thorough safety procedures and training, as persons wearing PPE may engage in risky behaviors thinking that they are protected (Liu et al. 2022; Gyekye and Salminen 2021; Solis and Philips 2018; Neitzel et al. 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karras, M., Delhomme, P., & Csillik, A.
Affiliations
  • Université Paris Nanterre (FR)
  • Université Gustave Eiffel (FR)
Corresponding author
Karras, Marion
Venue
Journal of Safety Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
80
Pages
235-242
ISSN
0022-4375 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200351714
Cited by
14
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Safety Research (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › IoT and GPS-based Vehicle Safety Systems
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Keywords
driver behavior, dangerous driving, empathy, self-compassion, personal distress, alexithymia, road traffic violations, road safety, psychological vulnerability, cognitive empathy, affective empathy, road traffic crashes
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Altruism, Automobile Driving, Dangerous Behavior, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk-Taking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review